← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fastml vs intsurv

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fastml and intsurv — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

fastml vs intsurv: at a glance

Featurefastmlintsurv
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesautoml, tidymodels, survival analysis, cross-validationsurvival-analysis, cure-models, censored-data, regularization
Last editorial update1h ago44m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fastml?

fastml added survival modelling and leakage-proof resampling, moving past classification and regression.

A tidymodels-based AutoML wrapper that trains, tunes and compares many engines from one call. The 0.6.x line added engine-specific tuning parameters, class-imbalance handling, early stopping and DALEX-based explainability. The 0.7.5 release is far larger: a full survival analysis task with its own engines, MICE imputation and integrated Brier scoring, plus unbiased nested cross-validation, grouped, blocked and rolling resampling helpers, fold-wise imputation, recipe leakage checks, and a sandbox for user-supplied preprocessing.

Read the full fastml trajectory →

What is intsurv?

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

Read the full intsurv trajectory →

fastml vs intsurv: editorial side-by-side

F
fastml
ANALYTICS
0.0

fastml added survival modelling and leakage-proof resampling, moving past classification and regression.

◆ Current state

A tidymodels-based AutoML wrapper that trains, tunes and compares many engines from one call. The 0.6.x line added engine-specific tuning parameters, class-imbalance handling, early stopping and DALEX-based explainability. The 0.7.5 release is far larger: a full survival analysis task with its own engines, MICE imputation and integrated Brier scoring, plus unbiased nested cross-validation, grouped, blocked and rolling resampling helpers, fold-wise imputation, recipe leakage checks, and a sandbox for user-supplied preprocessing.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from convenience wrapper to something that has to be defensible statistically. Nested cross-validation, fold-wise rather than up-front imputation, and explicit leakage checks are all corrections to the shortcuts that make AutoML easy and its scores optimistic. Survival adds a third task type alongside classification and regression, and it arrived with its own metrics rather than being bolted onto the existing ones. Note the entry body is cut off at 8,000 characters, so the release is larger than what is shown.

◆ Prediction

Expect the remaining survival engines to fill in and the sandboxing of custom preprocessing to tighten, since both were still being iterated on within this same release's commit list.

I
intsurv
ANALYTICS
0.0

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

◆ Current state

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has reached the point where the methods are settled and the remaining work is ergonomics. Moving control parameters, M-step settings and penalty specification into cox_cure.control(), cox_cure.mstep() and cox_cure_net.penalty() follows the established R convention of separating tuning from the model formula, and it arrives long after the arguments accumulated. The C++ headers were placed in inst/include as early as 2019 so other packages could link against them, which suggests the implementation was always intended to be reused.

◆ Prediction

The gap between 0.2.2 and 0.3.0 makes cadence a poor basis for prediction. What the entries do support is that the interface rework is unfinished business rather than a prelude to new methods, so consolidation around the new helper functions is the likelier next step.

Alternatives to fastml and intsurv

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fastml or intsurv.

See all fastml alternatives → · See all intsurv alternatives →

Recent activity from fastml and intsurv

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 8mo agofastmlVersion 0.7.5
  2. 10mo agointsurvModel configuration moves into dedicated control functions
  3. 1y agofastmlEngine-specific tuning, imbalance handling and explainability
  4. 1y agofastmlSingle-workflow evaluation fix
  5. 1y agofastmlVersion 0.5.0
  6. 5y agointsurvCross-validated model selection and offset terms added
  7. 6y agointsurvC++ headers relocated so other packages can link them
  8. 7y agointsurvCox cure models for uncertain event status arrive
  9. 7y agointsurvParameter initialization methods added to the alpha
  10. 7y agointsurvAlpha cut for paper submission and simulation reproducibility

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fastml and intsurv?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. fastml and intsurv are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fastml better than intsurv?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fastml and intsurv are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fastml?

Top fastml alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fastml alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fastml for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to intsurv?

Top intsurv alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "intsurv alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/intsurv for the full list with editorial commentary on each.