Delta Lake
A 4.4.0 tag appears, but the feed carries only its release plumbing
Comparison · Analytics
fastglm vs tulpa
A side-by-side editorial comparison of fastglm and tulpa — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
fastglm vs tulpa: at a glance
What is fastglm?
A fast GLM solver stops being one function and becomes a count-model family
fastglm ran C++ IRLS for standard generalized linear models for six years with almost no releases. In May 2026 it added three top-level model types — negative binomial with jointly estimated dispersion, hurdle, and zero-inflated — each with the entire fitting driver in C++ rather than an R loop around a C++ kernel. The following release generalised Firth bias reduction to every standard family across dense, sparse and streaming backends.
What is tulpa?
The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.
tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.
fastglm vs tulpa: editorial side-by-side
fastglm
0.0ANALYTICS
A fast GLM solver stops being one function and becomes a count-model family
◆ Current state
fastglm ran C++ IRLS for standard generalized linear models for six years with almost no releases. In May 2026 it added three top-level model types — negative binomial with jointly estimated dispersion, hurdle, and zero-inflated — each with the entire fitting driver in C++ rather than an R loop around a C++ kernel. The following release generalised Firth bias reduction to every standard family across dense, sparse and streaming backends.
◆ Where it's heading
The package changed what it is. Through 0.0.3 it was a drop-in replacement for glm() competing on speed; from 0.1.0 it targets the models people leave base R for — MASS::glm.nb, pscl::hurdle, pscl::zeroinfl — and reimplements their full estimation loops natively. The 0.1.1 follow-up is consolidation on that new surface: Firth generalised past binomial logit, SQUAREM acceleration on the zero-inflation EM driver, and a run of clamping guards and initialization fixes on the families most prone to overflow.
◆ Prediction
The numerical-stability work in 0.1.1 clusters on Tweedie and the inverse and sqrt link families, which suggests those paths are the newest and least exercised — expect further correctness fixes there before new model types.
tulpa
7.5ANALYTICS
The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.
◆ Current state
tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.
◆ Where it's heading
Two moves in nine days point at the same destination: the generics conversion made tulpa extensible by downstream packages, and CRAN admission makes it installable by them. The current cadence — several tags a week, some existing only to record a measurement that produced no code change — does not survive CRAN's submission overhead, so the release rhythm has to slow whether or not the project intends it. The correctness work still clusters on the joint nested-Laplace driver, and 0.1.0 extends the same diagnostics habit with .NL_AXIS_SD_REASONS, a closed vocabulary for an outer axis whose grid does not contain its own posterior mode.
◆ Prediction
Expect tulpaObs to follow tulpa onto CRAN, since it is the consumer whose registrations the engine has spent this window unblocking, and expect the version line to move in larger, less frequent steps now that each one carries a submission.
Alternatives to fastglm and tulpa
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fastglm or tulpa.
distributions3
distributions3 0.3.0 adds sample-based distributions and likelihood derivatives
Basedash
Basedash keeps pushing its data out of the workspace — now to people without accounts
RStudio
RStudio ships through release branches, and the notes are commit messages
dbt Core
dbt Fusion's second beta is adapter work: ClickHouse gets materializations, indexes, and catalogs
Fulcrum
Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.
See all fastglm alternatives → · See all tulpa alternatives →
Recent activity from fastglm and tulpa
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agotulpaFirst CRAN release: engine surface unchanged from 0.0.198 ⚡
- 4d agotulpatulpa_re_aghq() exposes the mode/theta cross-Hessian
- 8d agotulpaDense batched joint path could silently drop a grid cell
- 8d agotulpaCalibration and goodness-of-fit entry points become S3 generics ⚡
- 9d agotulpaCUDA backend had two definitions; link order decided if it ran
- 9d agotulpaHyperparameter bounds now flag when they leave the node range
- 2mo agofastglmFirth generalised to all families, plus SQUAREM and stability fixes
- 3mo agofastglmCRAN release 0.1.0 ⚡
- 4y agofastglmC++ headers exposed for linking
- 7y agofastglmFirst CRAN release of the C++ IRLS solver
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between fastglm and tulpa?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is fastglm better than tulpa?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to fastglm?
Top fastglm alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fastglm alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fastglm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tulpa?
Top tulpa alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tulpa alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tulpa for the full list with editorial commentary on each.