← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fastglm vs rempsyc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fastglm and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

fastglm vs rempsyc: at a glance

Featurefastglmrempsyc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesstatistical-computing, generalized-linear-models, cpp, r-packageapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2
Last editorial update6h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fastglm?

A fast GLM solver stops being one function and becomes a count-model family

fastglm ran C++ IRLS for standard generalized linear models for six years with almost no releases. In May 2026 it added three top-level model types — negative binomial with jointly estimated dispersion, hurdle, and zero-inflated — each with the entire fitting driver in C++ rather than an R loop around a C++ kernel. The following release generalised Firth bias reduction to every standard family across dense, sparse and streaming backends.

Read the full fastglm trajectory →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

fastglm vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side

F
fastglm
ANALYTICS
0.0

A fast GLM solver stops being one function and becomes a count-model family

◆ Current state

fastglm ran C++ IRLS for standard generalized linear models for six years with almost no releases. In May 2026 it added three top-level model types — negative binomial with jointly estimated dispersion, hurdle, and zero-inflated — each with the entire fitting driver in C++ rather than an R loop around a C++ kernel. The following release generalised Firth bias reduction to every standard family across dense, sparse and streaming backends.

◆ Where it's heading

The package changed what it is. Through 0.0.3 it was a drop-in replacement for glm() competing on speed; from 0.1.0 it targets the models people leave base R for — MASS::glm.nb, pscl::hurdle, pscl::zeroinfl — and reimplements their full estimation loops natively. The 0.1.1 follow-up is consolidation on that new surface: Firth generalised past binomial logit, SQUAREM acceleration on the zero-inflation EM driver, and a run of clamping guards and initialization fixes on the families most prone to overflow.

◆ Prediction

The numerical-stability work in 0.1.1 clusters on Tweedie and the inverse and sqrt link families, which suggests those paths are the newest and least exercised — expect further correctness fixes there before new model types.

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

Alternatives to fastglm and rempsyc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fastglm or rempsyc.

See all fastglm alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →

Recent activity from fastglm and rempsyc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agofastglmFirth generalised to all families, plus SQUAREM and stability fixes
  2. 3mo agofastglmCRAN release 0.1.0
  3. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  4. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  5. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  6. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  7. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  8. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically
  9. 4y agofastglmC++ headers exposed for linking
  10. 7y agofastglmFirst CRAN release of the C++ IRLS solver

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fastglm and rempsyc?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. fastglm and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fastglm better than rempsyc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fastglm and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fastglm?

Top fastglm alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fastglm alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fastglm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.