RMVMR
RMVMR is being tidied in lockstep with MVMR, the package it wraps
Comparison · Analytics
fasster vs kernelshap
A side-by-side editorial comparison of fasster and kernelshap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r package
fasster vs kernelshap: at a glance
What is fasster?
fasster arrives as a fable-compatible state space model for switching seasonality.
fasster implements FASSTER, a state space model with a switching component in the measurement equation, aimed at series carrying several seasonal patterns and abrupt structural change. Version 0.2.0 is the first substantive release: a formula interface with trend(), season(), fourier(), ARMA() and xreg() plus the %S% switching and %?% conditional operators, and the full fable method set. Parameters come from a filtering-and-smoothing heuristic rather than full optimisation.
What is kernelshap?
kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.
kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.
fasster vs kernelshap: editorial side-by-side
fasster
0.0ANALYTICS
fasster arrives as a fable-compatible state space model for switching seasonality.
◆ Current state
fasster implements FASSTER, a state space model with a switching component in the measurement equation, aimed at series carrying several seasonal patterns and abrupt structural change. Version 0.2.0 is the first substantive release: a formula interface with trend(), season(), fourier(), ARMA() and xreg() plus the %S% switching and %?% conditional operators, and the full fable method set. Parameters come from a filtering-and-smoothing heuristic rather than full optimisation.
◆ Where it's heading
The package sat at a 2018 development version for over seven years, so the news is that it exists as a usable model at all. Implementing the whole fable contract — forecast(), refit(), stream(), interpolate(), components() — means it slots into an existing forecasting workflow instead of asking for its own. The heuristic estimator is the open question these entries leave unanswered.
◆ Prediction
The obvious next step is supplementing the heuristic parameter estimates with proper optimisation, though the two entries here give no direct signal on timing.
kernelshap
0.0ANALYTICS
kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.
◆ Current state
kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.
◆ Where it's heading
Two concerns drive this package: making exact methods reach further, and being demonstrably right. The first shows in the additive explainer, the optional background dataset and the sampling permutation algorithm; the second in unit tests written against Python's shap, credited fixes from outside contributors, and a willingness to ship a correctness fix that changes numbers people have already published. Speed work runs continuously underneath — direct solves replacing the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse, roughly 10% less memory.
◆ Prediction
The 0.6.0 and 0.7.0 notes each promised a stable 1.0.0 that has not arrived; with the weighting bug fixed and parallelism reworked, a 1.0 release is the most plausible next step.
Alternatives to fasster and kernelshap
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fasster or kernelshap.
geoarrow-r
geoarrow tracks the GeoArrow spec and otherwise just keeps compiling
n2khab
n2khab keeps retracting interpretations of habitat data it can't actually support
tidypolars
tidypolars is grinding toward complete dplyr coverage, one supported function at a time
OneSampleMR
OneSampleMR found that argument order in a formula was silently changing its estimates
bpbounds
bpbounds found the same swapped-cell bug twice and clamped its bounds back into range
See all fasster alternatives → · See all kernelshap alternatives →
Recent activity from fasster and kernelshap
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 6mo agofassterFASSTER lands as a complete fable model ⚡
- 1y agokernelshapKernel weight bug fixed; parallelism moves to doFuture
- 1y agokernelshapSampling permutation SHAP with standard errors ⚡
- 1y agokernelshapBackground data now optional; ranger survival support
- 2y agokernelshapFactor-valued predictions dropped
- 2y agokernelshapadditive_shap() explains additive models exactly
- 2y agokernelshapFaster on plain data.frames
- 7y agofassterEarly development build
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between fasster and kernelshap?
Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. fasster and kernelshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is fasster better than kernelshap?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fasster and kernelshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to fasster?
Top fasster alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fasster alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fasster for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to kernelshap?
Top kernelshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kernelshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kernelshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.