← Back to home
Comparison · PM

Ever Teams vs Super Productivity

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Ever Teams and Super Productivity — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Ever Teams vs Super Productivity: at a glance

FeatureEver TeamsSuper Productivity
SectorPMPM
Velocity score5.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesteam-management, ci-cd, release-automation, performancesync-reliability, e2e-encryption, plugin-platform, local-first
Last editorial update17h ago3d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Ever Teams?

Ever Teams shipped ten tags in twelve hours and one of them touched the product

The window is ten releases published between 01:06 and 12:54 on a single day, and nine of them are continuous-integration work: runners migrated to self-hosted ARC, dead ubicloud labels replaced, the DigitalOcean deploy gated behind a flag, actions bumped to Node 24, a desktop cache bounded after it grew to 9.5 GB. The one product change is v0.133.58, which drops four unread relations from the team-wide daily-plan fetch. Several tags carry no changelog at all beyond a compare link.

Read the full Ever Teams trajectory →

What is Super Productivity?

A local-first task manager quietly rebuilding itself into a sync engine with a plugin platform on top.

Super Productivity ships minor releases every week or two where the visible feature work is thin and the real effort sits in sync. Across the last six releases the operation-log sync layer picked up field-level merging of concurrent edits, queued background requests, conflict replay, and encrypted-only enforcement for SuperSync. The plugin system absorbed the Azure DevOps and Trello issue providers and gained OAuth hooks plus local secret storage. Since v18.19.0 in early August the repository has published only working branch tags, so the numbered release stream has been quiet for over a week.

Read the full Super Productivity trajectory →

Ever Teams vs Super Productivity: editorial side-by-side

E5.0

Ever Teams shipped ten tags in twelve hours and one of them touched the product

◆ Current state

The window is ten releases published between 01:06 and 12:54 on a single day, and nine of them are continuous-integration work: runners migrated to self-hosted ARC, dead ubicloud labels replaced, the DigitalOcean deploy gated behind a flag, actions bumped to Node 24, a desktop cache bounded after it grew to 9.5 GB. The one product change is v0.133.58, which drops four unread relations from the team-wide daily-plan fetch. Several tags carry no changelog at all beyond a compare link.

◆ Where it's heading

The release train is fully automated and fires on every merge, so tag count says nothing about progress here — the same CI changelog is restated verbatim across multiple tags minutes apart. What work is visible points at build infrastructure being rebuilt around self-hosted runners rather than at the application.

◆ Prediction

Until the runner migration settles, expect the tag stream to stay dominated by CI commits, with product changes appearing as occasional query-cost fixes like the daily-plan one.

S5.0

A local-first task manager quietly rebuilding itself into a sync engine with a plugin platform on top.

◆ Current state

Super Productivity ships minor releases every week or two where the visible feature work is thin and the real effort sits in sync. Across the last six releases the operation-log sync layer picked up field-level merging of concurrent edits, queued background requests, conflict replay, and encrypted-only enforcement for SuperSync. The plugin system absorbed the Azure DevOps and Trello issue providers and gained OAuth hooks plus local secret storage. Since v18.19.0 in early August the repository has published only working branch tags, so the numbered release stream has been quiet for over a week.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc is a single-user local app growing the two things multi-device users demand — sync they can trust and third-party integrations — without standing up a server the project has to operate. Sync is being pushed toward fail-closed defaults: encryption is enforced rather than offered, plaintext downloads are refused, stale-key uploads are blocked, and the local REST API now demands a bearer token. Integrations are moving the other way, out of core and into plugins that can authenticate on their own. The one visible thread since then is design-system work — dialogs being moved off hardcoded fills onto theme tokens — which suggests a theming pass running between releases.

◆ Prediction

Expect the opt-in split-file delta sync format to become the default once conflict replay settles, and more built-in issue providers to follow Azure DevOps and Trello out of core into plugins. The current styling commits point to a theme-token cleanup landing in the next numbered release, though the branch tags alone do not say how large it is.

Alternatives to Ever Teams and Super Productivity

Other PM products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Ever Teams or Super Productivity.

See all Ever Teams alternatives → · See all Super Productivity alternatives →

Recent activity from Ever Teams and Super Productivity

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 22h agoEver TeamsVersion bump with an empty changelog
  2. 22h agoEver TeamsCI runners moved to self-hosted ARC and Node 24 actions
  3. 22h agoEver TeamsCI restatement of the self-hosted ARC runner migration
  4. 22h agoEver TeamsTeam-wide daily-plan fetch drops four unread relations
  5. 23h agoEver TeamsDesktop CI cache bounded after it stalled the build
  6. 1d agoEver TeamsVersion bump with an empty changelog
  7. 3d agoSuper ProductivityDialog fills move to theme tokens; callout markup corrected
  8. 11d agoSuper ProductivityEncrypted-only sync enforced; local REST API now needs a token
  9. 25d agoSuper ProductivityRecurring task settings fold into the planner's schedule dialog
  10. 1mo agoSuper ProductivityConcurrent edits to the same task now merge field by field
  11. 1mo agoSuper ProductivitySync fix: project move replays now converge
  12. 1mo agoSuper ProductivityTodoist import, Android widget, opt-in split-file delta sync

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Ever Teams and Super Productivity?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Ever Teams and Super Productivity are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Ever Teams better than Super Productivity?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Ever Teams and Super Productivity are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other PM products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Ever Teams?

Top Ever Teams alternatives in PM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Ever Teams alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ever-teams for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Super Productivity?

Top Super Productivity alternatives in PM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Super Productivity alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/super-productivity for the full list with editorial commentary on each.