← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

eulerr vs intsurv

A side-by-side editorial comparison of eulerr and intsurv — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

eulerr vs intsurv: at a glance

Featureeulerrintsurv
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeseuler-diagrams, set-visualization, optimization, cpp-backendsurvival-analysis, cure-models, censored-data, regularization
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is eulerr?

The area-proportional Euler diagram package is finished software, and maintained like it.

eulerr generates area-proportional Euler and Venn diagrams by numerically optimizing shape positions and sizes to match set relationships, with the fitting done in C++. The last feature release was 7.0.0 in December 2022, which made the optimization's loss function user-selectable. Everything since has been maintenance: documentation URL corrections, a strip-layout fix when grouping, an Armadillo deprecation, and an R CMD check warning about an unignored config file.

Read the full eulerr trajectory →

What is intsurv?

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

Read the full intsurv trajectory →

eulerr vs intsurv: editorial side-by-side

E
eulerr
ANALYTICS
0.0

The area-proportional Euler diagram package is finished software, and maintained like it.

◆ Current state

eulerr generates area-proportional Euler and Venn diagrams by numerically optimizing shape positions and sizes to match set relationships, with the fitting done in C++. The last feature release was 7.0.0 in December 2022, which made the optimization's loss function user-selectable. Everything since has been maintenance: documentation URL corrections, a strip-layout fix when grouping, an Armadillo deprecation, and an R CMD check warning about an unignored config file.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a mature package whose problem is solved, and the release pattern reflects that — three of the last four releases changed nothing a user would see. What activity remains is tracking its dependencies rather than its own roadmap: keeping up with Armadillo's deprecations and R CMD check policy is the whole of recent work. The two September 2025 releases an hour apart are a fix and its follow-up, not a development cycle restarting.

◆ Prediction

The pattern points to continued upkeep triggered by upstream C++ and CRAN check changes rather than new capability. If anything does move, the configurable loss function added in 7.0.0 is the surface with room left in it.

I
intsurv
ANALYTICS
0.0

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

◆ Current state

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has reached the point where the methods are settled and the remaining work is ergonomics. Moving control parameters, M-step settings and penalty specification into cox_cure.control(), cox_cure.mstep() and cox_cure_net.penalty() follows the established R convention of separating tuning from the model formula, and it arrives long after the arguments accumulated. The C++ headers were placed in inst/include as early as 2019 so other packages could link against them, which suggests the implementation was always intended to be reused.

◆ Prediction

The gap between 0.2.2 and 0.3.0 makes cadence a poor basis for prediction. What the entries do support is that the interface rework is unfinished business rather than a prelude to new methods, so consolidation around the new helper functions is the likelier next step.

Alternatives to eulerr and intsurv

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either eulerr or intsurv.

See all eulerr alternatives → · See all intsurv alternatives →

Recent activity from eulerr and intsurv

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 10mo agointsurvModel configuration moves into dedicated control functions
  2. 10mo agoeulerrConfig file added to Rbuildignore to clear a check warning
  3. 10mo agoeulerrDeprecated Armadillo call replaced and doc links repaired
  4. 2y agoeulerrStrip order and layout corrected for grouped diagrams
  5. 2y agoeulerrInternal documentation and a stale link corrected
  6. 3y agoeulerrLayout optimization gains a selectable loss function
  7. 4y agoeulerrCitation added and error messages improved
  8. 5y agointsurvCross-validated model selection and offset terms added
  9. 6y agointsurvC++ headers relocated so other packages can link them
  10. 7y agointsurvCox cure models for uncertain event status arrive
  11. 7y agointsurvParameter initialization methods added to the alpha
  12. 7y agointsurvAlpha cut for paper submission and simulation reproducibility

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between eulerr and intsurv?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. eulerr and intsurv are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is eulerr better than intsurv?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. eulerr and intsurv are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to eulerr?

Top eulerr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "eulerr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/eulerr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to intsurv?

Top intsurv alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "intsurv alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/intsurv for the full list with editorial commentary on each.