← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

EpiNow2 vs tidypolars

A side-by-side editorial comparison of EpiNow2 and tidypolars — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

EpiNow2 vs tidypolars: at a glance

FeatureEpiNow2tidypolars
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesepidemiology, bayesian-modelling, reproduction-number, r-packagepolars, r, dplyr, dataframes
Last editorial update3h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is EpiNow2?

EpiNow2 unified its model interface, then went back to deepen the estimators behind it

EpiNow2 estimates reproduction numbers, infections and delay distributions from incomplete epidemiological reporting data. 1.8.0 was the structural turning point: every main modelling function now returns a consistent S3 object with `fit`, `args` and `observations`, reachable through shared accessors. The releases either side of it work on estimator quality — accumulation of irregularly reported data in 1.7.0, and a substantial expansion of `estimate_truncation()` in 1.9.0.

Read the full EpiNow2 trajectory →

What is tidypolars?

tidypolars is grinding toward complete dplyr coverage, one supported function at a time

tidypolars lets you write dplyr and tidyr syntax against Polars DataFrames and LazyFrames. Its releases follow a fixed shape: raise the required polars version, add a handful of newly supported R functions and arguments, fix places where behaviour diverges from dplyr. Recent additions run from %notin% and as.integer() to .before/.after in mutate() and time zone handling in datetime parsing. Cadence is roughly every six to ten weeks and has not varied.

Read the full tidypolars trajectory →

EpiNow2 vs tidypolars: editorial side-by-side

E
EpiNow2
ANALYTICS
0.0

EpiNow2 unified its model interface, then went back to deepen the estimators behind it

◆ Current state

EpiNow2 estimates reproduction numbers, infections and delay distributions from incomplete epidemiological reporting data. 1.8.0 was the structural turning point: every main modelling function now returns a consistent S3 object with `fit`, `args` and `observations`, reachable through shared accessors. The releases either side of it work on estimator quality — accumulation of irregularly reported data in 1.7.0, and a substantial expansion of `estimate_truncation()` in 1.9.0.

◆ Where it's heading

The package spent this window paying down interface debt and is now extending from the tidier base. Options that existed only for `estimate_infections()` have been propagated outward: `estimate_truncation()` gained the full `dist_spec` delay families, `obs_opts()` observation model selection between Poisson and negative binomial, and the `likelihood` and `return_likelihood` settings that make prior-only fits and loo-compatible output possible. Hardcoded assumptions are being replaced by specifiable ones in the same motion — the truncation model's additive noise term was a fixed `sigma ~ normal(0, 1)` prior and is now a `dist_spec` argument.

◆ Prediction

Expect the remaining modelling functions to keep converging on the shared options interface, since the last two releases have each moved another function onto it. A new `estimate_dist()` for interval-censored linelist data suggests delay estimation is the area still gaining surface.

T
tidypolars
ANALYTICS
0.0

tidypolars is grinding toward complete dplyr coverage, one supported function at a time

◆ Current state

tidypolars lets you write dplyr and tidyr syntax against Polars DataFrames and LazyFrames. Its releases follow a fixed shape: raise the required polars version, add a handful of newly supported R functions and arguments, fix places where behaviour diverges from dplyr. Recent additions run from %notin% and as.integer() to .before/.after in mutate() and time zone handling in datetime parsing. Cadence is roughly every six to ten weeks and has not varied.

◆ Where it's heading

Coverage is the whole strategy, and the target has been widening from dplyr into tidyr — unnest_longer_polars(), separate_longer_delim_polars() and separate_longer_position_polars() bring list-column and string-splitting verbs that have no Polars-idiomatic equivalent in the tidyverse dialect. The other consistent thread is fidelity: distinct() dropping unselected columns, summarize() dropping the last group, relocate() honouring tidy-select helpers, NULL in mutate() behaving as dplyr does. Each of these is a small breaking change made to match the reference rather than to differ from it.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of tracking the polars floor upward every release and following tidyverse changes closely — .by in fill() arrived when tidyr 1.3.2 shipped it — suggests the next releases continue mirroring new dplyr and tidyr arguments rather than adding a distinct capability.

Alternatives to EpiNow2 and tidypolars

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either EpiNow2 or tidypolars.

See all EpiNow2 alternatives → · See all tidypolars alternatives →

Recent activity from EpiNow2 and tidypolars

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.19.0
  2. 1mo agoEpiNow2estimate_truncation gains full delay and observation options
  3. 4mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.18.0
  4. 6mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.17.0
  5. 6mo agoEpiNow2Unified return objects and shared accessors across all models
  6. 6mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.16.0
  7. 9mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.15.1
  8. 9mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.15.0
  9. 1y agoEpiNow2Patch for an upstream rstan issue
  10. 1y agoEpiNow2Accumulation for irregularly reported data; unified priors
  11. 1y agoEpiNow2Matern kernel spectral density fix and GP prior revert
  12. 1y agoEpiNow2Gaussian Process model improvements and explicit defaults

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between EpiNow2 and tidypolars?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. EpiNow2 and tidypolars are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is EpiNow2 better than tidypolars?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. EpiNow2 and tidypolars are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to EpiNow2?

Top EpiNow2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "EpiNow2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/epinow2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tidypolars?

Top tidypolars alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidypolars alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidypolars for the full list with editorial commentary on each.