← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

enpls vs weird

A side-by-side editorial comparison of enpls and weird — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

enpls vs weird: at a glance

Featureenplsweird
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themespartial-least-squares, ensemble-learning, chemometrics, maintenance-modeanomaly-detection, r-package, distributional, robust-statistics
Last editorial update1h ago5h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is enpls?

enpls has not changed its statistics since 2016 — only its website, twice.

enpls implements ensemble partial least squares regression, with variants for feature selection, outlier detection and model applicability. Across the six most recent releases there is not one change to the modeling code. They cover a documentation website, a website URL change, a font stack, code indentation, a CI service, and most recently a GitHub Actions migration with an R CMD check note fix.

Read the full enpls trajectory →

What is weird?

weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.

An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.

Read the full weird trajectory →

enpls vs weird: editorial side-by-side

E
enpls
ANALYTICS
0.0

enpls has not changed its statistics since 2016 — only its website, twice.

◆ Current state

enpls implements ensemble partial least squares regression, with variants for feature selection, outlier detection and model applicability. Across the six most recent releases there is not one change to the modeling code. They cover a documentation website, a website URL change, a font stack, code indentation, a CI service, and most recently a GitHub Actions migration with an R CMD check note fix.

◆ Where it's heading

The statistical work finished around version 5.6, which added cross-validation fold control and fixed component selection when the maximum was left unspecified. Everything since has kept the package installable and its docs online. The 2025 release arriving the same day as sibling package grex, with the same two fixes, confirms the pattern: these are maintainer sweeps across a portfolio, not attention to enpls specifically.

◆ Prediction

The next release will almost certainly be another CRAN or tooling fix. Six consecutive infrastructure-only releases across nine years give no basis for expecting new methods.

W
weird
ANALYTICS
0.0

weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.

◆ Current state

An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.

◆ Where it's heading

The refactor onto a shared distribution representation is the decision everything else follows from. It let 2.1.0 add hdr() and parameters() methods for kde objects rather than bespoke accessors, and it let 3.0.0 bring in dist_mclust() to turn a Gaussian mixture model into the same object type — so a mixture, a kernel density estimate and a fitted distribution all flow through one interface. The 3.0.0 additions lean visual and multivariate: outlier maps plotting score distance against orthogonal distance, biplot projections with variable axes overlaid, and an augment() method for robust PCA objects. Dependencies have been shed steadily along the way — lookout, interpolation — while mvscale() moved out and then back in.

◆ Prediction

Expect surprisals() coverage to keep extending to further model classes, and the multivariate and robust-PCA diagnostics introduced in 3.0.0 to gain the same distributional-object treatment as the univariate side.

Alternatives to enpls and weird

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either enpls or weird.

See all enpls alternatives → · See all weird alternatives →

Recent activity from enpls and weird

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoweirdOutlier maps, biplot projections, and Gaussian mixtures as distributional objects
  2. 3mo agoweirdsurprisals() reaches glm objects; lookout dependency dropped
  3. 6mo agoweirdPackage refactored onto distributional objects; density_scores becomes surprisals
  4. 1y agoenplsenpls 6.1.1 moves pkgdown to GitHub Actions
  5. 2y agoweirdWine reviews dataset replaced with a fetch function
  6. 7y agoenplsenpls 6.1 adopts tidyverse code style
  7. 8y agoenplsenpls 6.0 changes the documentation URL
  8. 8y agoenplsenpls 5.9 drops Google Fonts from vignettes
  9. 9y agoenplsenpls 5.8 updates gallery images, enables HTTPS
  10. 9y agoenplsenpls 5.7 adds a pkgdown site and Windows CI

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between enpls and weird?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. enpls and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is enpls better than weird?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. enpls and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to enpls?

Top enpls alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "enpls alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/enpls for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to weird?

Top weird alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "weird alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/weird-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.