Teable
Secrets get encrypted at rest while the computed-field engine keeps getting shored up
Comparison · Collab
Elgg vs tufte
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Elgg and tufte — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Elgg vs tufte: at a glance
What is Elgg?
A social-networking engine in careful maintenance across two supported branches.
Elgg is running a two-branch release cadence: a 7.0.x line taking bug fixes and a 6.3.x line receiving backports. The recent pairs shipped within two hours of each other — 7.0.5 carrying a single performance fix that stops likes generating ajax response data for unsupported entities, while 6.3.8 carries the longer list: improved sanitization of installer config values, a valid client IP for the core, embedded-image handling in notification emails, mute-option validation, and a permission check before a profile header image can be changed. Contributor counts stay in the low single digits with the same one or two maintainers on nearly every release.
What is tufte?
After three quiet years, tufte 0.15 finally lets Tufte-style documents cross-reference.
Almost every release before the latest is a Pandoc compatibility fix — sidenotes breaking on Pandoc 2.15, margin references misplaced on 2.11, table and citation handling in `tufte_handout()`, `--wrap preserve` for margin content on 2.19. Then 0.15.0 in May 2026 breaks the pattern: `tufte_handout2()`, `tufte_book2()` and `tufte_html2()` wrap the corresponding bookdown formats, enabling text references and cross-references in captions, and `margin_fig_pos` gives global control over margin-figure placement.
Elgg vs tufte: editorial side-by-side
Elgg
5.0COLLAB
A social-networking engine in careful maintenance across two supported branches.
◆ Current state
Elgg is running a two-branch release cadence: a 7.0.x line taking bug fixes and a 6.3.x line receiving backports. The recent pairs shipped within two hours of each other — 7.0.5 carrying a single performance fix that stops likes generating ajax response data for unsupported entities, while 6.3.8 carries the longer list: improved sanitization of installer config values, a valid client IP for the core, embedded-image handling in notification emails, mute-option validation, and a permission check before a profile header image can be changed. Contributor counts stay in the low single digits with the same one or two maintainers on nearly every release.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a mature project maintaining a stable base rather than pushing new capability, and the balance between the branches is worth noting: the older 6.3 line is receiving more substantive hardening than the current 7.0 line, which has already settled into single-commit patches. That is what a project looks like when most of its deployments have not migrated yet. The 6.3.8 items — input sanitization, permission validation before a mutating action — are the security-shaped fixes that earlier 6.3 releases summarised only as 'small security update'.
◆ Prediction
Expect the alternating pattern to continue: 7.0.x patches as issues surface, with matching 6.3.x backports carrying the hardening work, until a 7.1 cycle opens. The entries give no indication of when that might be.
tufte
0.0COLLAB
After three quiet years, tufte 0.15 finally lets Tufte-style documents cross-reference.
◆ Current state
Almost every release before the latest is a Pandoc compatibility fix — sidenotes breaking on Pandoc 2.15, margin references misplaced on 2.11, table and citation handling in `tufte_handout()`, `--wrap preserve` for margin content on 2.19. Then 0.15.0 in May 2026 breaks the pattern: `tufte_handout2()`, `tufte_book2()` and `tufte_html2()` wrap the corresponding bookdown formats, enabling text references and cross-references in captions, and `margin_fig_pos` gives global control over margin-figure placement.
◆ Where it's heading
The package spent years absorbing upstream Pandoc churn without adding anything, and has now moved to sit on top of bookdown rather than reimplement around it. That is the sustainable direction for a format package this small: inherit cross-referencing and text references instead of maintaining a parallel implementation. Release intervals remain long, so this is unlikely to become a fast-moving package.
◆ Prediction
Expect the bookdown-backed formats to absorb further fixes as the recommended path, with the plain `tufte_*()` formats staying frozen against Pandoc changes.
Alternatives to Elgg and tufte
Other Collab products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Elgg or tufte.
GitHub
Security and governance controls catch up to the Copilot build-out
NetNewsWire
7.1.3 ships on the Mac, closing a release spent almost entirely on rebuilding Feedly sync.
HumHub
HumHub's public feed carries only betas, and 1.19's is still about surviving the upgrade.
Hive
Hive keeps tightening the same three seams: planned time, admin control, and AI review scope
AFFiNE
A dated canary most days, with the beta line carrying the same commits later.
Recent activity from Elgg and tufte
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 16h agoElggLikes stop generating ajax data for unsupported entities
- 18h agoElgg6.3 branch gets installer sanitization and profile permission validation
- 20d agoElggGatekeeper fix for inaccessible deleted entities
- 20d agoElggSecurity patch on the 6.3 maintenance branch
- 1mo agoElggCKEditor pinned to the correct GPL-licensed version
- 1mo agoElggSmall fixes across the 7.0 line
- 2mo agotuftetufte 0.15.0
- 3y agotuftetufte 0.13 fixes margin content on Pandoc 2.19
- 4y agotuftetufte 0.12 restores sidenotes on Pandoc 2.15
- 4y agotuftetufte 0.11 fixes tables and citations in handouts
- 5y agotuftetufte 0.10 fixes margin references with link-citations
- 5y agotuftetufte 0.9 adds CSLReferences for Pandoc 2.11 citeproc
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Elgg and tufte?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Elgg is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Elgg better than tufte?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Elgg is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Collab products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Elgg?
Top Elgg alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Elgg alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/elgg for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tufte?
Top tufte alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tufte alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tufte-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.