← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

edibble vs rfacebookstat

A side-by-side editorial comparison of edibble and rfacebookstat — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

edibble vs rfacebookstat: at a glance

Featureedibblerfacebookstat
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesexperimental-design, grammar-of-design, reproducibility, simulationr-package, facebook-ads, api-migration, marketing-analytics
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is edibble?

A grammar for experimental design that learned to compose designs and track its own provenance.

edibble expresses experimental designs declaratively — units, treatments, records and their allotments — rather than calling a canned design function. Since 1.0.0 its internals run on a Provenance object that records the commands used to build a design, and 1.1.0 added conditional treatments, design composition and a separated simulation step. Recent work has focused on designs constructed from existing data rather than from scratch.

Read the full edibble trajectory →

What is rfacebookstat?

A Facebook Marketing API client for R whose release schedule belongs to Meta, not its author.

rfacebookstat wraps the Facebook Marketing API for R analysts, and nearly every release is a migration to a newer API version — v14, v15, v16, v19, v20 all appear in this window. Feature work rides along with those migrations: fbGetAdAccounts() gained a spend_cap field, and fbGetMarketingStat() gained use_unified_attribution_setting, which switches results to the ad-set-level attribution settings and overrides the older account-level argument.

Read the full rfacebookstat trajectory →

edibble vs rfacebookstat: editorial side-by-side

E
edibble
ANALYTICS
0.0

A grammar for experimental design that learned to compose designs and track its own provenance.

◆ Current state

edibble expresses experimental designs declaratively — units, treatments, records and their allotments — rather than calling a canned design function. Since 1.0.0 its internals run on a Provenance object that records the commands used to build a design, and 1.1.0 added conditional treatments, design composition and a separated simulation step. Recent work has focused on designs constructed from existing data rather than from scratch.

◆ Where it's heading

Development has moved from vocabulary to composition. Early releases established the core grammar; 1.0.0 replaced the internal R6 machinery with a Provenance object that tracks both internal and external commands, which is what lets a design carry its own construction history. On that foundation 1.1.0 added the ability to add two designs together, express conditional treatment structures, and split simulation specification from execution. The 2025 release turns toward a different entry point — wiring up level edges and unit attributes when an edibble object is built from data that already exists, rather than from a design declared up front.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued work on designs derived from existing data, since that is where the last release concentrated and it is the path least covered by the declarative grammar.

R
rfacebookstat
ANALYTICS
0.0

A Facebook Marketing API client for R whose release schedule belongs to Meta, not its author.

◆ Current state

rfacebookstat wraps the Facebook Marketing API for R analysts, and nearly every release is a migration to a newer API version — v14, v15, v16, v19, v20 all appear in this window. Feature work rides along with those migrations: fbGetAdAccounts() gained a spend_cap field, and fbGetMarketingStat() gained use_unified_attribution_setting, which switches results to the ad-set-level attribution settings and overrides the older account-level argument.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's direction is set almost entirely by Meta's deprecation cycle, and the release notes read as a log of keeping up. The attribution work is the one strand with its own logic: an argument added in 2.10.0, then fixed in 2.12.1 when it turned out not to apply unless fetch_by was also used. Three versions cut within four and a half hours on one day in April 2023 show migrations being cleared in batches rather than steadily.

◆ Prediction

The next release will almost certainly be a migration to a newer Marketing API version, since that has triggered every version in this history; whether anything else ships with it depends on what Meta changes.

Alternatives to edibble and rfacebookstat

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either edibble or rfacebookstat.

See all edibble alternatives → · See all rfacebookstat alternatives →

Recent activity from edibble and rfacebookstat

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1y agoedibbleBetter handling of designs built from existing data
  2. 1y agorfacebookstatMarketing API v20 support; attribution argument fix
  3. 2y agorfacebookstatUnified attribution settings option for marketing stats
  4. 2y agoedibbleedibble 1.1.0
  5. 2y agoedibbleInternals rebuilt on a command-tracking Provenance object
  6. 3y agoedibbleS3 consistency and citation modernised
  7. 3y agorfacebookstatRe-tag of the v16.0 migration, same notes as 2.9.0
  8. 3y agorfacebookstatMigration to Facebook Marketing API v16.0
  9. 3y agorfacebookstatMigration to Facebook Marketing API v15.0
  10. 3y agorfacebookstatAccount spend caps exposed; vignettes restored
  11. 3y agoedibbleRd files fixed for HTML5 compatibility
  12. 4y agoedibbleInitial release

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between edibble and rfacebookstat?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. edibble and rfacebookstat are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is edibble better than rfacebookstat?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. edibble and rfacebookstat are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to edibble?

Top edibble alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "edibble alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/edibble for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rfacebookstat?

Top rfacebookstat alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rfacebookstat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rfacebookstat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.