randomwalk
randomwalk spent every release getting an R simulation to run in the browser, not on a server.
Comparison · Analytics
ecodive vs lstar
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ecodive and lstar — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
ecodive vs lstar: at a glance
What is ecodive?
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
ecodive computes alpha and beta diversity metrics for ecological and microbiome count data, including phylogenetic measures like Faith's PD and the UniFrac family. The 2.0.0 rewrite expanded it from a handful of metrics to roughly fourteen alpha and thirty beta measures while flipping the expected input orientation to samples-as-rows. Subsequent releases have been spent settling the normalisation interface that expansion exposed.
What is lstar?
A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces
lstar stores single-cell data behind one C++ core with Python, R and JS/WASM bindings, and ships a browser viewer that reads the store directly. Zarr v3 is now the default on-disk format across all four surfaces, with zstd compression and sharding that packs many chunks into fewer objects. Viewer stores are compressed per field and resolved at chunk granularity, so a hosted viewer fetches only what it displays. The tag stream carries both lstar and lstar-sc releases.
ecodive vs lstar: editorial side-by-side
ecodive
0.0ANALYTICS
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
◆ Current state
ecodive computes alpha and beta diversity metrics for ecological and microbiome count data, including phylogenetic measures like Faith's PD and the UniFrac family. The 2.0.0 rewrite expanded it from a handful of metrics to roughly fourteen alpha and thirty beta measures while flipping the expected input orientation to samples-as-rows. Subsequent releases have been spent settling the normalisation interface that expansion exposed.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a package that made its breaking changes deliberately and in a cluster. After 2.0.0 reoriented input and removed the weighted parameter, 2.1.0 superseded rescale with norm, and 2.2.6 changed norm's default from percent to none and removed it from some beta functions entirely. That last one matters more than it reads: normalisation defaults silently change the numbers a metric returns, and the direction is toward making the user state their choice rather than inheriting one.
◆ Prediction
With the metric surface broad and the normalisation interface now explicit, expect the next releases to stabilise — documentation and edge-case handling around CLR and rarefaction rather than another interface break.
lstar
5.0ANALYTICS
A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces
◆ Current state
lstar stores single-cell data behind one C++ core with Python, R and JS/WASM bindings, and ships a browser viewer that reads the store directly. Zarr v3 is now the default on-disk format across all four surfaces, with zstd compression and sharding that packs many chunks into fewer objects. Viewer stores are compressed per field and resolved at chunk granularity, so a hosted viewer fetches only what it displays. The tag stream carries both lstar and lstar-sc releases.
◆ Where it's heading
The through-line is making a hosted store cheap to read. Sharding addresses the file-per-chunk explosion that makes many-chunk arrays awkward to host; per-field compression with chunk-granular resolution means colouring an embedding by one gene fetches one column rather than an array. The 0.2.x patches are the cost of maintaining four surfaces at once — a WASM heap crash that only browsers exercise, and a count-basis orientation defect where all three surfaces normalized in memory and none owned the on-disk layout.
◆ Prediction
The orientation bug's root cause — no surface owning the on-disk representation while all three normalized in memory — is the kind of gap that usually produces a validation or ownership change rather than another point fix.
Alternatives to ecodive and lstar
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ecodive or lstar.
fastml
fastml added survival modelling and leakage-proof resampling, moving past classification and regression.
abclass
abclass built out angle-based classifiers in 2022, then went quiet except for CRAN upkeep.
churon
churon is spending its entire release history getting a Rust ONNX binding through CRAN.
firatheme
firatheme woke up after four years and started fixing what ggplot2 changed underneath it.
bagyo
bagyo reached CRAN as a Philippine tropical cyclone dataset, with its tags stamped out of order.
See all ecodive alternatives → · See all lstar alternatives →
Recent activity from ecodive and lstar
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 21d agolstarViewer count-basis orientation fixed; existing stores need re-prep
- 26d agolstarWASM viewer crash on resizable heaps fixed
- 1mo agolstarlstar 0.2.0 ⚡
- 1mo agolstarMeasure state inferred from content, not slot name
- 4mo agoecodiveNormalisation now defaults to none, with CLR zero warnings
- 7mo agoecodiveecodive 2.2.2
- 10mo agoecodiverescale superseded by norm; crash fixes after the 2.0.0 rewrite
- 10mo agoecodive2.0.0 expands to ~14 alpha and ~30 beta diversity metrics ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between ecodive and lstar?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. lstar is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is ecodive better than lstar?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lstar is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to ecodive?
Top ecodive alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ecodive alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ecodive for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to lstar?
Top lstar alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lstar alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lstar for the full list with editorial commentary on each.