fastml
fastml added survival modelling and leakage-proof resampling, moving past classification and regression.
Comparison · Analytics
lstar vs randomwalk
A side-by-side editorial comparison of lstar and randomwalk — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
lstar vs randomwalk: at a glance
What is lstar?
A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces
lstar stores single-cell data behind one C++ core with Python, R and JS/WASM bindings, and ships a browser viewer that reads the store directly. Zarr v3 is now the default on-disk format across all four surfaces, with zstd compression and sharding that packs many chunks into fewer objects. Viewer stores are compressed per field and resolved at chunk granularity, so a hosted viewer fetches only what it displays. The tag stream carries both lstar and lstar-sc releases.
What is randomwalk?
randomwalk spent every release getting an R simulation to run in the browser, not on a server.
A random walk and fractal-growth simulation package whose entire visible history is about its browser deployment. Six releases in four weeks moved a Shinylive dashboard from a blank black page to a working app — WebAssembly mounted from GitHub releases, CORS resolved by same-origin serving, missing plotting dependencies installed in-browser, then an async version using crew workers with its own debug log. A correctness fix followed, adding termination-position validation so simulations stop producing isolated pixels, and the most recent release publishes the package itself as a webR binary repository.
lstar vs randomwalk: editorial side-by-side
lstar
5.0ANALYTICS
A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces
◆ Current state
lstar stores single-cell data behind one C++ core with Python, R and JS/WASM bindings, and ships a browser viewer that reads the store directly. Zarr v3 is now the default on-disk format across all four surfaces, with zstd compression and sharding that packs many chunks into fewer objects. Viewer stores are compressed per field and resolved at chunk granularity, so a hosted viewer fetches only what it displays. The tag stream carries both lstar and lstar-sc releases.
◆ Where it's heading
The through-line is making a hosted store cheap to read. Sharding addresses the file-per-chunk explosion that makes many-chunk arrays awkward to host; per-field compression with chunk-granular resolution means colouring an embedding by one gene fetches one column rather than an array. The 0.2.x patches are the cost of maintaining four surfaces at once — a WASM heap crash that only browsers exercise, and a count-basis orientation defect where all three surfaces normalized in memory and none owned the on-disk layout.
◆ Prediction
The orientation bug's root cause — no surface owning the on-disk representation while all three normalized in memory — is the kind of gap that usually produces a validation or ownership change rather than another point fix.
randomwalk
0.0ANALYTICS
randomwalk spent every release getting an R simulation to run in the browser, not on a server.
◆ Current state
A random walk and fractal-growth simulation package whose entire visible history is about its browser deployment. Six releases in four weeks moved a Shinylive dashboard from a blank black page to a working app — WebAssembly mounted from GitHub releases, CORS resolved by same-origin serving, missing plotting dependencies installed in-browser, then an async version using crew workers with its own debug log. A correctness fix followed, adding termination-position validation so simulations stop producing isolated pixels, and the most recent release publishes the package itself as a webR binary repository.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is being built as a browser artifact first and an R package second: the readme, the vignettes and the release notes all point at a hosted dashboard rather than at library(). The last release completes that by making the compiled WebAssembly build installable by anyone via webr::install(), which turns the deployment work into something reusable outside this project. Version numbers are unreliable here — v0.2.0 was published two weeks after v1.0.2 — so read the dates, not the tags.
◆ Prediction
With the webR repository published, the next work most likely moves back to the simulation itself, though the entries give no direct evidence of planned features.
Alternatives to lstar and randomwalk
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either lstar or randomwalk.
abclass
abclass built out angle-based classifiers in 2022, then went quiet except for CRAN upkeep.
churon
churon is spending its entire release history getting a Rust ONNX binding through CRAN.
firatheme
firatheme woke up after four years and started fixing what ggplot2 changed underneath it.
bagyo
bagyo reached CRAN as a Philippine tropical cyclone dataset, with its tags stamped out of order.
rainette
rainette rebuilt its Reinert clustering in 0.2.0, tuned it in 0.3.0, and has coasted since.
See all lstar alternatives → · See all randomwalk alternatives →
Recent activity from lstar and randomwalk
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 21d agolstarViewer count-basis orientation fixed; existing stores need re-prep
- 26d agolstarWASM viewer crash on resizable heaps fixed
- 1mo agolstarlstar 0.2.0 ⚡
- 1mo agolstarMeasure state inferred from content, not slot name
- 8mo agorandomwalkPackage published as an installable webR binary repository
- 8mo agorandomwalkTermination validation removes isolated pixels from simulations
- 8mo agorandomwalkAsync dashboard with crew workers running under WebR
- 9mo agorandomwalkBrowser dashboard working end to end
- 9mo agorandomwalkMissing plot dependency and parameter display fixed
- 9mo agorandomwalkDashboard mounts WebAssembly from GitHub releases
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between lstar and randomwalk?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. lstar is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is lstar better than randomwalk?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lstar is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to lstar?
Top lstar alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lstar alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lstar for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to randomwalk?
Top randomwalk alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "randomwalk alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/randomwalk for the full list with editorial commentary on each.