tidyr
tidyr replaced separate() with a family that says what it does.
Comparison · Analytics
performance vs shiny
A side-by-side editorial comparison of performance and shiny — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
performance vs shiny: at a glance
What is performance?
performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.
performance is at 0.17.1, which added check_priors() for prior predictive checks on Bayesian models and gave check_overdispersion(), check_model() and check_predictions() arguments to control residual type and plot range. The releases before it are a similar mix: a -2LL criterion column in test_likelihoodratio(), Bayesian predictive checks routed through modelbased, and in 0.16.0 a set of breaking renames including RMSA to the correct RMSR.
What is shiny?
Shiny made reactive apps observable, then gave them a way to tear themselves down
Version 1.12.0 added OpenTelemetry support through the {otel} package, emitting spans for session start and end, reactive updates and individual reactive expressions, with collection depth set by an option or environment variable. The releases since have refined it - scoped collection controls in 1.12.1, cleaner stack traces in 1.13.0 - while 1.14.0 turned to lifecycle, adding session$destroy() on module proxies and a non-blocking startApp() for driving apps programmatically.
performance vs shiny: editorial side-by-side
performance
0.0ANALYTICS
performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.
◆ Current state
performance is at 0.17.1, which added check_priors() for prior predictive checks on Bayesian models and gave check_overdispersion(), check_model() and check_predictions() arguments to control residual type and plot range. The releases before it are a similar mix: a -2LL criterion column in test_likelihoodratio(), Bayesian predictive checks routed through modelbased, and in 0.16.0 a set of breaking renames including RMSA to the correct RMSR.
◆ Where it's heading
Two consistent habits. Diagnostics keep gaining arguments to narrow what is examined — ppc_range, x_limits, maximum_dots, show_ci — which reads as a package being used on models large and awkward enough that the defaults stopped working. And simulated residuals via DHARMa keep displacing standard ones as the basis for the checks themselves.
◆ Prediction
With check_priors() newly added and Bayesian predictive checks now routed through modelbased, the next release most likely extends the Bayesian diagnostic set rather than reworking the frequentist checks.
shiny
0.0ANALYTICS
Shiny made reactive apps observable, then gave them a way to tear themselves down
◆ Current state
Version 1.12.0 added OpenTelemetry support through the {otel} package, emitting spans for session start and end, reactive updates and individual reactive expressions, with collection depth set by an option or environment variable. The releases since have refined it - scoped collection controls in 1.12.1, cleaner stack traces in 1.13.0 - while 1.14.0 turned to lifecycle, adding session$destroy() on module proxies and a non-blocking startApp() for driving apps programmatically.
◆ Where it's heading
The framework is addressing the two things that make Shiny apps hard to run in production: you could not see inside the reactive graph, and you could not reliably dispose of parts of it. Tracing answers the first; scoped destruction of module session proxies answers the second. Both are aimed at long-lived, dynamically composed apps rather than at the single-file demo.
◆ Prediction
Expect the OpenTelemetry attribute names to settle once the deprecated spellings are dropped, and more of the reactive lifecycle to gain explicit teardown hooks now that session$destroy() has established the pattern. Editor integration is a likely area for follow-up after the Ark breakpoint support.
Alternatives to performance and shiny
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either performance or shiny.
modeltime
modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.
cmdstanpy
CmdStanPy is clearing deprecations ahead of a 2.0 it keeps announcing.
dowhy
DoWhy adds one estimation method a year and keeps its identification edge.
OpenHouse
OpenHouse is hardening the seams where table policies and jobs quietly fail.
silx
silx 3.0 moved its default Qt binding to PySide6 — a migration for everyone embedding it.
See all performance alternatives → · See all shiny alternatives →
Recent activity from performance and shiny
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoperformancecheck_priors() added; overdispersion plots use simulated residuals
- 1mo agoshinyModule scopes gain session$destroy() for reactive teardown
- 2mo agoperformance-2LL criterion column and unified Bayesian predictive checks
- 5mo agoshinyInteractive breakpoints under Ark; cleaner render stack traces
- 6mo agoperformanceBreaking renames plus point-count and CI controls in check_model()
- 8mo agoshinyScoped OpenTelemetry collection controls
- 8mo agoshinyShiny adds OpenTelemetry tracing of the reactive graph ⚡
- 8mo agoperformancecheck_autocorrelation() methods for DHARMa objects
- 10mo agoperformanceFixes CRAN checks after an rstanarm update
- 11mo agoperformancetinytable output format in display()
- 1y agoshinyRegression fixes for input bindings and label updates
- 1y agoshinyAuto-reload covers modules and support files
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between performance and shiny?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. performance and shiny are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is performance better than shiny?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. performance and shiny are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to performance?
Top performance alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "performance alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/easystats-performance for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to shiny?
Top shiny alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "shiny alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/r-shiny for the full list with editorial commentary on each.