wooldridge
A textbook data package whose whole job is to stay installable, and whose releases prove how much work that is.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
Dub vs projoint
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Dub and projoint — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Dub vs projoint: at a glance
| Feature | Dub | projoint |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Infra & APIs | Infra & APIs |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 2.5 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | partner programs, affiliate marketing, link management, attribution | conjoint-analysis, survey-research, qualtrics, cran |
| Last editorial update | 3mo ago | 59m ago |
| Website | — | Visit → |
What is Dub?
Dub keeps building Dub Partners into a serious partner-program OS — staggered rewards, group rules, analytics depth.
Dub is in a sustained build-out of Dub Partners alongside the original link product. The recent window added staggered reward durations (e.g. 25% for the first 12 months, 10% after), automatic group moves when partners hit performance milestones with audit history, bulk partner invites with customizable emails, multi/negative analytics filters across partners and links, Stripe free-trial tracking as lead events, and Viewer/Billing workspace roles for finer-grained access.
What is projoint?
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
Dub vs projoint: editorial side-by-side
Dub
0.0INFRA · APIS
Dub keeps building Dub Partners into a serious partner-program OS — staggered rewards, group rules, analytics depth.
◆ Current state
Dub is in a sustained build-out of Dub Partners alongside the original link product. The recent window added staggered reward durations (e.g. 25% for the first 12 months, 10% after), automatic group moves when partners hit performance milestones with audit history, bulk partner invites with customizable emails, multi/negative analytics filters across partners and links, Stripe free-trial tracking as lead events, and Viewer/Billing workspace roles for finer-grained access.
◆ Where it's heading
The partner program is becoming the gravity well. Each release either deepens program operators' control (commission shapes, automated tiering, role-based access) or improves the analytics layer that justifies those decisions. The Stripe trial tracking suggests Dub wants to own the full attribution chain from click to subscription, not just clicks. Cadence is steady and clearly themed.
◆ Prediction
Expect more commission/tiering primitives — bonuses, tier overrides, retroactive adjustments — and tighter Stripe/attribution coupling that handles refunds and churn natively. A formal marketplace for discovering vetted partners is plausible once individual-partner-page features mature.
projoint
2.5INFRA · APIS
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
◆ Current state
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
Alternatives to Dub and projoint
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Dub or projoint.
L1centrality
A graph-centrality package that spent 2026 making its existing measures usable at scale, then went quiet.
exametrika
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
nuggets
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
eratosthenes
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
See all Dub alternatives → · See all projoint alternatives →
Recent activity from Dub and projoint
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
- 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
- 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
- 5mo agoDubStaggered reward durations
- 5mo agoDubGroup move rules
- 5mo agoDubBulk invite partners (and other updates)
- 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
- 6mo agoDubAdvanced analytics filters
- 6mo agoDubSupport for tracking Stripe free trials
- 7mo agoDubBetter security with the new viewer and billing roles
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Dub and projoint?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Dub better than projoint?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Dub?
Top Dub alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Dub alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dub for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to projoint?
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.