rnaturalearth
rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.
Comparison · Analytics
dtplyr vs rgbif
A side-by-side editorial comparison of dtplyr and rgbif — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
dtplyr vs rgbif: at a glance
What is dtplyr?
dtplyr stopped hijacking data.table objects and became an opt-in translator
dtplyr converts dplyr and tidyr code into data.table syntax, and 1.3.0 redrew its boundary: verbs no longer dispatch to dtplyr translations just because dtplyr is loaded, so lazy_dt() has to be called explicitly. Since then the work has been translation coverage — reframe(), case_match(), consecutive_id() — plus a long tail of correctness fixes in grouping and .by.
What is rgbif?
rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.
rgbif ships several times a year and the recent releases cluster around downloads. 3.8.1 added `occ_download_sql()` for SQL-based occurrence downloads; 3.8.2 added DOI-to-download-key resolution and institutionKey downloads; 3.8.3 relayed GBIF's new throttling of bulk paging through `occ_search()` with a message pointing users at `occ_download()`; 3.8.5 added a family of `occ_download_stats_*()` functions plus multiple-taxonomy and verbatim-extension downloads. Alongside that, `name_backbone()` moved to GBIF API v2, and 3.8.0 soft-deprecated `occ_data()`.
dtplyr vs rgbif: editorial side-by-side
dtplyr
0.0ANALYTICS
dtplyr stopped hijacking data.table objects and became an opt-in translator
◆ Current state
dtplyr converts dplyr and tidyr code into data.table syntax, and 1.3.0 redrew its boundary: verbs no longer dispatch to dtplyr translations just because dtplyr is loaded, so lazy_dt() has to be called explicitly. Since then the work has been translation coverage — reframe(), case_match(), consecutive_id() — plus a long tail of correctness fixes in grouping and .by.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is trailing dplyr's own feature releases rather than leading them, adding each new verb once it settles upstream. Performance work is targeted at specific verbs where data.table has a faster primitive: setorder() for arrange(), reference drops for select(), rleid() for consecutive_id(). Release cadence has thinned considerably since 2023.
◆ Prediction
Expect further one-for-one translations as dplyr adds verbs, and continued fixes around .by and non-standard column names; the entries show no sign of a broader redesign.
rgbif
0.0ANALYTICS
rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.
◆ Current state
rgbif ships several times a year and the recent releases cluster around downloads. 3.8.1 added `occ_download_sql()` for SQL-based occurrence downloads; 3.8.2 added DOI-to-download-key resolution and institutionKey downloads; 3.8.3 relayed GBIF's new throttling of bulk paging through `occ_search()` with a message pointing users at `occ_download()`; 3.8.5 added a family of `occ_download_stats_*()` functions plus multiple-taxonomy and verbatim-extension downloads. Alongside that, `name_backbone()` moved to GBIF API v2, and 3.8.0 soft-deprecated `occ_data()`.
◆ Where it's heading
Two things are happening at once. GBIF is discouraging bulk retrieval through the search API, and rgbif is building out the download path fast enough to absorb the traffic — SQL queries, DOI round-tripping, format description, and now statistics about the downloads themselves. Metadata coverage has expanded in parallel, with a dozen `dataset_*()` functions in 3.7.9 and GRSciColl institution search in 3.8.3. The deprecations are consistent: `occ_data()`, `occ_facet()`, `occ_count(type=)` all retired in favour of narrower replacements.
◆ Prediction
The download surface is where the next additions will land — likely more SQL-download tooling and further statistics endpoints, following 3.8.1 and 3.8.5.
Alternatives to dtplyr and rgbif
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either dtplyr or rgbif.
writexl
writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.
rstanarm
rstanarm is community-maintained now, tracking Stan and lme4 rather than adding models.
taxa
taxa started a ground-up rewrite in 2021 and has published almost nothing since.
rotl
rotl's whole release history is keeping name matching honest against a moving taxonomy.
taxize
taxize spends its releases absorbing other people's API changes, one dead source at a time.
See all dtplyr alternatives → · See all rgbif alternatives →
Recent activity from dtplyr and rgbif
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4mo agorgbifrgbif 3.8.5 adds occurrence download statistics functions
- 8mo agorgbifrgbif 3.8.4 moves name matching to GBIF API v2
- 11mo agodtplyrreframe(), case_match() and consecutive_id() gain translations
- 11mo agorgbifrgbif 3.8.3 adds GRSciColl search, relays GBIF paging throttle
- 1y agorgbifrgbif 3.8.2 resolves download DOIs to keys
- 1y agorgbifrgbif 3.8.1 adds SQL-based occurrence downloads ⚡
- 2y agorgbifrgbif 3.8.0 soft-deprecates occ_data(), adds download describe
- 3y agodtplyrcrayon dependency dropped
- 3y agodtplyrVerbs stop auto-dispatching; lazy_dt() now required ⚡
- 3y agodtplyrdtplyr 1.2.2
- 4y agodtplyrdtplyr 1.2.1
- 4y agodtplyrEight tidyr verbs gain data.table translations
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between dtplyr and rgbif?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. dtplyr and rgbif are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is dtplyr better than rgbif?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. dtplyr and rgbif are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to dtplyr?
Top dtplyr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "dtplyr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dtplyr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rgbif?
Top rgbif alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rgbif alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rgbif for the full list with editorial commentary on each.