← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

discretefdr vs slope

A side-by-side editorial comparison of discretefdr and slope — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

discretefdr vs slope: at a glance

Featurediscretefdrslope
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmultiple-testing, false-discovery-rate, discrete-statistics, r-packagesparse-regression, penalized-models, cpp, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is discretefdr?

The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.

DiscreteFDR implements false discovery rate procedures adapted for discrete test statistics, where the standard continuous-case corrections are conservative. It now covers a discrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure alongside the Benjamini-Hochberg variants it started with, including adaptive versions. Its datasets and test-result classes have been moved out into companion packages, so it increasingly does one job and defers the rest.

Read the full discretefdr trajectory →

What is slope?

A year after gutting itself for a C++ rewrite, SLOPE is back to polishing the interface

SLOPE fits sorted L-one penalized regression models. In July 2025 it replaced its entire solver with the external libslope C++ library, removing the ADMM solver, dropping debugging fields, changing alpha scaling and warning users directly that the breakage was extensive. The releases since have rebuilt convenience on top of that core: summary() and refit() methods for cross-validated objects, automatic refitting in cvSLOPE(), and a threading default reduced from half the available cores to one.

Read the full slope trajectory →

discretefdr vs slope: editorial side-by-side

D
discretefdr
ANALYTICS
0.0

The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.

◆ Current state

DiscreteFDR implements false discovery rate procedures adapted for discrete test statistics, where the standard continuous-case corrections are conservative. It now covers a discrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure alongside the Benjamini-Hochberg variants it started with, including adaptive versions. Its datasets and test-result classes have been moved out into companion packages, so it increasingly does one job and defers the rest.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is decomposition into a suite. The amnesia dataset went to DiscreteDatasets, summary output now interoperates with the DiscreteTestResults class from DiscreteTests, and match.pvals() stopped being exported — each release trims something that belongs elsewhere. What remains gets methodological additions at a slow, deliberate cadence, with performance work on the step-up procedures that dominate cost when the number of tests is large. Recent activity is maintenance: replacing deprecated calls the package still made of its own siblings. This is a mature statistical package whose release notes are short because the methods underneath them are settled.

◆ Prediction

Expect further alignment with the companion packages rather than new procedures, since the last substantive release was already about interoperating with DiscreteTests classes and the most recent one about clearing deprecations.

S
slope
ANALYTICS
0.0

A year after gutting itself for a C++ rewrite, SLOPE is back to polishing the interface

◆ Current state

SLOPE fits sorted L-one penalized regression models. In July 2025 it replaced its entire solver with the external libslope C++ library, removing the ADMM solver, dropping debugging fields, changing alpha scaling and warning users directly that the breakage was extensive. The releases since have rebuilt convenience on top of that core: summary() and refit() methods for cross-validated objects, automatic refitting in cvSLOPE(), and a threading default reduced from half the available cores to one.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc runs rewrite, then repair, then convenience. The 1.2.0 release is the repair phase — coefficients_scaled was returning unscaled values, which silently affected every coef.SLOPE() call — and 2.0.0 onward is convenience, with refit() now working without re-supplying training data. The tag timestamps are non-monotonic: 1.0.1 is stamped a minute after 1.1.0 despite the lower version, so ordering here reflects when tags were pushed, not what superseded what.

◆ Prediction

With the cross-validation workflow now closing itself out through automatic refitting, further work is more likely to extend the summary and plotting surface than to touch the solver again.

Alternatives to discretefdr and slope

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either discretefdr or slope.

See all discretefdr alternatives → · See all slope alternatives →

Recent activity from discretefdr and slope

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agosloperefit() defaults to training data; class-mismatch scoring fixed
  2. 3mo agodiscretefdrDeprecated internal calls replaced
  3. 6mo agoslopeCross-validation now refits automatically and gains summary methods
  4. 9mo agoslopeSingle-threaded by default, interruptible, and a scaling bug fixed
  5. 9mo agoslopeM1 Mac test fix
  6. 9mo agoslopeGlioma gene expression dataset added
  7. 1y agoslopeSLOPE 1.0.0
  8. 1y agodiscretefdrDiscrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure added
  9. 1y agodiscretefdrDatasets split out and step-up procedures sped up

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between discretefdr and slope?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. discretefdr and slope are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is discretefdr better than slope?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. discretefdr and slope are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to discretefdr?

Top discretefdr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "discretefdr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/discretefdr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to slope?

Top slope alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "slope alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/slope for the full list with editorial commentary on each.