← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

discretefdr vs rnpn

A side-by-side editorial comparison of discretefdr and rnpn — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

discretefdr vs rnpn: at a glance

Featurediscretefdrrnpn
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmultiple-testing, false-discovery-rate, discrete-statistics, r-packagephenology, api-client, ecological-data, data-cleaning
Last editorial update5h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is discretefdr?

The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.

DiscreteFDR implements false discovery rate procedures adapted for discrete test statistics, where the standard continuous-case corrections are conservative. It now covers a discrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure alongside the Benjamini-Hochberg variants it started with, including adaptive versions. Its datasets and test-result classes have been moved out into companion packages, so it increasingly does one job and defers the rest.

Read the full discretefdr trajectory →

What is rnpn?

The USA phenology data client rebuilt its entire stack and stopped handing users -9999 as a number.

rnpn is the R client for the USA National Phenology Network, retrieving observation records, phenometrics and gridded model layers. Version 1.3.0 in March 2025 replaced nearly all of its infrastructure at once — sp and raster dropped, terra made optional, XML swapped for xml2, plyr for dplyr, httr and curl for httr2 — and changed what functions return, with tibbles in place of data.tables and empty tibbles in place of NULL on error. The two releases since have completed the missing-value handling and restored performance lost in the transition.

Read the full rnpn trajectory →

discretefdr vs rnpn: editorial side-by-side

D
discretefdr
ANALYTICS
0.0

The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.

◆ Current state

DiscreteFDR implements false discovery rate procedures adapted for discrete test statistics, where the standard continuous-case corrections are conservative. It now covers a discrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure alongside the Benjamini-Hochberg variants it started with, including adaptive versions. Its datasets and test-result classes have been moved out into companion packages, so it increasingly does one job and defers the rest.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is decomposition into a suite. The amnesia dataset went to DiscreteDatasets, summary output now interoperates with the DiscreteTestResults class from DiscreteTests, and match.pvals() stopped being exported — each release trims something that belongs elsewhere. What remains gets methodological additions at a slow, deliberate cadence, with performance work on the step-up procedures that dominate cost when the number of tests is large. Recent activity is maintenance: replacing deprecated calls the package still made of its own siblings. This is a mature statistical package whose release notes are short because the methods underneath them are settled.

◆ Prediction

Expect further alignment with the companion packages rather than new procedures, since the last substantive release was already about interoperating with DiscreteTests classes and the most recent one about clearing deprecations.

R
rnpn
ANALYTICS
0.0

The USA phenology data client rebuilt its entire stack and stopped handing users -9999 as a number.

◆ Current state

rnpn is the R client for the USA National Phenology Network, retrieving observation records, phenometrics and gridded model layers. Version 1.3.0 in March 2025 replaced nearly all of its infrastructure at once — sp and raster dropped, terra made optional, XML swapped for xml2, plyr for dplyr, httr and curl for httr2 — and changed what functions return, with tibbles in place of data.tables and empty tibbles in place of NULL on error. The two releases since have completed the missing-value handling and restored performance lost in the transition.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being brought onto the current R stack and made honest about missing data, and those are the same project. Converting the -9999 sentinel to NA started in 1.3.0 for download functions and was extended to all columns in 1.4.1; the string "emptyvalue" got the same treatment. Beyond the migration, the feature additions are modest and specific to the domain, such as custom start and end dates for defining a phenometrics season.

◆ Prediction

With the dependency migration finished and sentinel handling now applied across all columns, the next releases most likely return to domain features and to fixes surfaced by the server side, which has already prompted work through migrations and backend moves. The removed progress indicator is an acknowledged regression that may come back.

Alternatives to discretefdr and rnpn

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either discretefdr or rnpn.

See all discretefdr alternatives → · See all rnpn alternatives →

Recent activity from discretefdr and rnpn

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agodiscretefdrDeprecated internal calls replaced
  2. 11mo agornpnSentinel -9999 now converted to NA across all columns
  3. 1y agornpnCustom season windows for phenometrics, and a speed regression fixed
  4. 1y agodiscretefdrDiscrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure added
  5. 1y agornpnDependency stack and return types replaced wholesale
  6. 1y agornpnBackfilled notes for seven earlier maintenance releases
  7. 1y agodiscretefdrDatasets split out and step-up procedures sped up

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between discretefdr and rnpn?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. discretefdr and rnpn are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is discretefdr better than rnpn?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. discretefdr and rnpn are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to discretefdr?

Top discretefdr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "discretefdr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/discretefdr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rnpn?

Top rnpn alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rnpn alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rnpn for the full list with editorial commentary on each.