← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

discretefdr vs STACAS

A side-by-side editorial comparison of discretefdr and STACAS — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

discretefdr vs STACAS: at a glance

FeaturediscretefdrSTACAS
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmultiple-testing, false-discovery-rate, discrete-statistics, r-packagesingle-cell, batch-correction, data-integration, seurat
Last editorial update6h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is discretefdr?

The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.

DiscreteFDR implements false discovery rate procedures adapted for discrete test statistics, where the standard continuous-case corrections are conservative. It now covers a discrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure alongside the Benjamini-Hochberg variants it started with, including adaptive versions. Its datasets and test-result classes have been moved out into companion packages, so it increasingly does one job and defers the rest.

Read the full discretefdr trajectory →

What is STACAS?

Single-cell batch correction that learned to use cell labels, then spent three releases chasing Seurat.

STACAS integrates single-cell RNA-seq datasets by finding and weighting anchors between them, with rPCA-distance-based downweighting and an optional semi-supervised mode that uses cell type labels to discard inconsistent anchors. IntegrateData.STACAS() performs the integration natively rather than handing off, and StandardizeGeneSymbols() normalises gene naming across datasets before anchors are computed.

Read the full STACAS trajectory →

discretefdr vs STACAS: editorial side-by-side

D
discretefdr
ANALYTICS
0.0

The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.

◆ Current state

DiscreteFDR implements false discovery rate procedures adapted for discrete test statistics, where the standard continuous-case corrections are conservative. It now covers a discrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure alongside the Benjamini-Hochberg variants it started with, including adaptive versions. Its datasets and test-result classes have been moved out into companion packages, so it increasingly does one job and defers the rest.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is decomposition into a suite. The amnesia dataset went to DiscreteDatasets, summary output now interoperates with the DiscreteTestResults class from DiscreteTests, and match.pvals() stopped being exported — each release trims something that belongs elsewhere. What remains gets methodological additions at a slow, deliberate cadence, with performance work on the step-up procedures that dominate cost when the number of tests is large. Recent activity is maintenance: replacing deprecated calls the package still made of its own siblings. This is a mature statistical package whose release notes are short because the methods underneath them are settled.

◆ Prediction

Expect further alignment with the companion packages rather than new procedures, since the last substantive release was already about interoperating with DiscreteTests classes and the most recent one about clearing deprecations.

S
STACAS
ANALYTICS
0.0

Single-cell batch correction that learned to use cell labels, then spent three releases chasing Seurat.

◆ Current state

STACAS integrates single-cell RNA-seq datasets by finding and weighting anchors between them, with rPCA-distance-based downweighting and an optional semi-supervised mode that uses cell type labels to discard inconsistent anchors. IntegrateData.STACAS() performs the integration natively rather than handing off, and StandardizeGeneSymbols() normalises gene naming across datasets before anchors are computed.

◆ Where it's heading

The method work concentrated in version 2.0 and has been stable since; everything after is Seurat compatibility and operational robustness. Versions 2.1.1 through 2.3.0 track Seurat v5 assays, v3-to-v5 conversion, multi-layer objects and SCT normalisation, with the genuinely useful additions — a reference seed dataset, max.seed.datasets for large-scale integration, min.sample.size — arriving as side effects of that work. The package is from the same lab as GeneNMF, and its release rhythm follows the single-cell ecosystem's upstream churn rather than an internal roadmap.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to follow further Seurat object-model changes, which have driven the last three. Nothing in the entries indicates new anchor-scoring or correction methodology in progress.

Alternatives to discretefdr and STACAS

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either discretefdr or STACAS.

See all discretefdr alternatives → · See all STACAS alternatives →

Recent activity from discretefdr and STACAS

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agodiscretefdrDeprecated internal calls replaced
  2. 1y agoSTACASMulti-layer objects and Seurat v3-to-v5 conversion handled
  3. 1y agodiscretefdrDiscrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure added
  4. 1y agodiscretefdrDatasets split out and step-up procedures sped up
  5. 2y agoSTACASscale.data option for extreme batch effects; gene name conversion table
  6. 3y agoSTACASReference seeding, gene symbol standardisation, large-scale integration path
  7. 4y agoSTACASSemi-supervised integration and rPCA anchor downweighting
  8. 5y agoSTACASSeurat 4.0.0 compatibility and SCTransform support

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between discretefdr and STACAS?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. discretefdr and STACAS are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is discretefdr better than STACAS?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. discretefdr and STACAS are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to discretefdr?

Top discretefdr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "discretefdr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/discretefdr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to STACAS?

Top STACAS alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "STACAS alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/stacas for the full list with editorial commentary on each.