ToolJet
ToolJet runs two release trains at once, and neither has changed direction in months
Comparison · Infra & APIs
Depot vs Knock
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Depot and Knock — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Depot vs Knock: at a glance
| Feature | Depot | Knock |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Infra & APIs | Infra & APIs |
| Velocity score | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Sparks · 30d | 1 | 1 |
| Top themes | ci-cd, build-acceleration, test-analytics, source-control | notification-infrastructure, data-sources, agent-native, workflow-orchestration |
| Last editorial update | 1d ago | 4d ago |
| Website | — | — |
What is Depot?
Depot is expanding from faster builds into the whole CI stack — tests, source control, and its own metal.
Depot has spent the last month building outward from build acceleration. Test results went generally available with JUnit ingest, org-wide flaky and slow test analytics, and timing-based shard balancing. Underneath that, Depot Metal moved CI and Sandboxes onto bare-metal microVMs the company controls end to end, and Depot Code entered private beta as a diskless git server backed by blob storage. The smaller releases fill in the surrounding surface: Tailscale access to private networks, GitLab OIDC, Datadog CI Visibility, stacked pull requests, and macOS 26 runners on M4.
What is Knock?
Knock is wiring both ends of the messaging data loop, then putting an agent on top
Knock has spent the last month building around its notification engine rather than inside it. Two new inbound data sources, Amplitude and Clay, let product events, cohorts, and enriched account rows land in Knock without customers writing sync code, while message and engagement events flow back out to the warehouse. The dashboard work alongside it, a rebuilt template editor, saved views and tags, schema management, and passkeys, reads as hardening for teams rather than individual developers.
Depot vs Knock: editorial side-by-side
Depot
6.3INFRA · APIS
Depot is expanding from faster builds into the whole CI stack — tests, source control, and its own metal.
◆ Current state
Depot has spent the last month building outward from build acceleration. Test results went generally available with JUnit ingest, org-wide flaky and slow test analytics, and timing-based shard balancing. Underneath that, Depot Metal moved CI and Sandboxes onto bare-metal microVMs the company controls end to end, and Depot Code entered private beta as a diskless git server backed by blob storage. The smaller releases fill in the surrounding surface: Tailscale access to private networks, GitLab OIDC, Datadog CI Visibility, stacked pull requests, and macOS 26 runners on M4.
◆ Where it's heading
Each layer Depot adds is one it previously rented — compute from cloud runners, source hosting from GitHub, test insight from nothing at all. Owning the storage and hypervisor tiers is what makes the performance claims possible, and owning test data is what turns a build accelerator into something that reports on the pipeline rather than just running it faster. The pattern suggests Depot is positioning as the full CI platform, with speed as the entry point rather than the product.
◆ Prediction
Depot Code should move from private to open beta with tighter Depot CI integration, since a git server the company controls is what makes source-aware caching and test selection possible. Expect the test analytics to grow toward selecting which tests to run, not only how to split them.
Knock
6.3INFRA · APIS
Knock is wiring both ends of the messaging data loop, then putting an agent on top
◆ Current state
Knock has spent the last month building around its notification engine rather than inside it. Two new inbound data sources, Amplitude and Clay, let product events, cohorts, and enriched account rows land in Knock without customers writing sync code, while message and engagement events flow back out to the warehouse. The dashboard work alongside it, a rebuilt template editor, saved views and tags, schema management, and passkeys, reads as hardening for teams rather than individual developers.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction is away from a notification API you call and toward the system that holds the messaging state. Ingesting cohort membership and enriched contact data is CDP-adjacent territory, and the wait-for-event function turns linear sequences into event-driven orchestration. The Knock agent then adds a natural-language layer over performance data, so the platform answers questions instead of only exporting rows.
◆ Prediction
Expect more data sources on the same pattern, warehouse and CRM-side connectors that keep audiences in sync without customer glue code. Whether the agent moves from reading analytics to editing workflows directly is the open question these entries do not yet answer.
Alternatives to Depot and Knock
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Depot or Knock.
Honeycomb
Honeycomb bets that the agent, not the engineer, should notice the anomaly first
Jenkins
Jenkins is shrinking its own war file and rebuilding its UI, one weekly release at a time
GitHub
Copilot's model roster churns weekly while GitHub quietly rewires policy and billing plumbing
incident.io
Nexus does the diagnosis; the rest is on-call plumbing
werf
Four channels, one fix stream — werf's releases are mostly concurrency repairs.
Recent activity from Depot and Knock
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2d agoDepotmacOS 26 is now the default macOS version for GitHub Actions runners
- 6d agoKnockAmplitude data source
- 9d agoDepotDepot CI now supports native GitHub stacked pull requests
- 13d agoKnockAnalytics in the Knock agent ⚡
- 14d agoDepotTest results are now generally available ⚡
- 14d agoKnockWait for event function
- 15d agoKnockClay data source
- 20d agoKnockRedesigned template editor
- 22d agoDepotAI analysis available for all Depot CI workflows and jobs
- 27d agoKnockBranch rebasing
- 28d agoDepotSplit CI test suites with historical timing data (beta)
- 1mo agoDepotDepot CI now supports Tailscale
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Depot and Knock?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Depot and Knock are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Depot better than Knock?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Depot and Knock are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Depot?
Top Depot alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Depot alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/depot for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Knock?
Top Knock alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Knock alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/knock for the full list with editorial commentary on each.