Omni
Omni adds embed MCP tokens and webhook delivery for AI routines.
Comparison · Analytics
Deepnote vs OpenCTI
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Deepnote and OpenCTI — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Deepnote vs OpenCTI: at a glance
| Feature | Deepnote | OpenCTI |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Analytics | Analytics |
| Velocity score | 2.5 | 5.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | data notebooks, agentic ai, mcp, workspace context | threat-intelligence, ingestion-health, custom-views, enterprise-edition |
| Last editorial update | 4h ago | 2d ago |
| Website | — | Visit → |
What is Deepnote?
Deepnote's agent now runs from first prompt to finished notebook without handoffs.
Deepnote's most recent entry, in October, makes Deepnote Agent a single agent that keeps context from the first instruction to the finished notebook, and lets private and shared projects sit in the same folder. It builds on June's native Codex connection to a workspace's notebooks, schedules and data, and July's MCP tools that let agents create and attach integrations. Spring releases added run snapshots, Git sync, Polars support, PDF export and AI usage metering.
What is OpenCTI?
OpenCTI imports custom views from Hub and lays the groundwork for ingestion health.
OpenCTI keeps a weekly-or-faster release cadence. 7.261030.0 adds Hub import to custom views, manual updates to security coverage results, configurable date and time display in tables, and export and bootstrap import of configuration bundles. It also restricts custom-field definitions to Enterprise Edition and fixes Priority Intelligence Requirement access restrictions that were not enforced for organization-scoped users. 7.261030.1 stops low-confidence enrichment from disturbing indicator lifecycle metadata.
Deepnote vs OpenCTI: editorial side-by-side
Deepnote
2.5ANALYTICS
Deepnote's agent now runs from first prompt to finished notebook without handoffs.
◆ Current state
Deepnote's most recent entry, in October, makes Deepnote Agent a single agent that keeps context from the first instruction to the finished notebook, and lets private and shared projects sit in the same folder. It builds on June's native Codex connection to a workspace's notebooks, schedules and data, and July's MCP tools that let agents create and attach integrations. Spring releases added run snapshots, Git sync, Polars support, PDF export and AI usage metering.
◆ Where it's heading
The notebook is being repositioned as a workspace agents operate in, both Deepnote's own agent and external ones like Codex. Releases have slowed from monthly in spring to one entry each in July and October.
◆ Prediction
Further agent capabilities or more external agent connections are the likeliest next move; the slower cadence makes timing hard to read.
OpenCTI
5.0ANALYTICS
OpenCTI imports custom views from Hub and lays the groundwork for ingestion health.
◆ Current state
OpenCTI keeps a weekly-or-faster release cadence. 7.261030.0 adds Hub import to custom views, manual updates to security coverage results, configurable date and time display in tables, and export and bootstrap import of configuration bundles. It also restricts custom-field definitions to Enterprise Edition and fixes Priority Intelligence Requirement access restrictions that were not enforced for organization-scoped users. 7.261030.1 stops low-confidence enrichment from disturbing indicator lifecycle metadata.
◆ Where it's heading
After two weeks spent on dashboards and the knowledge graph, attention is turning to platform administration: configuration presets, Hub-distributed views, connector forms and ingestion health, which is being built behind a feature flag. Custom fields now sit on the Enterprise side of the line, so new data-model flexibility is being used as a paid differentiator. Access-control fixes keep appearing, which suggests organization segregation is still being hardened.
◆ Prediction
Expect ingestion health to leave its feature flag in a coming weekly, with email notifications already in place. The entries do not indicate when a new LTS line will be cut.
Alternatives to Deepnote and OpenCTI
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Deepnote or OpenCTI.
GoAccess
GoAccess 1.12 splits AI crawlers from search bots in web log reports.
OpenSearch Dashboards
This feed samples OpenSearch Dashboards; its latest entry is a 2.19.7 notes commit.
Apache Iceberg
Iceberg 1.12 drops Spark 3.4 and starts laying groundwork for the v4 table spec.
ManageEngine Log360
Log360's September build fixes the migration to the unified console.
Apache Storm
Storm 3.1 adds an Iceberg sink and closes a long list of security gaps in Nimbus and the UI.
See all Deepnote alternatives → · See all OpenCTI alternatives →
Recent activity from Deepnote and OpenCTI
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3d agoOpenCTIOpenCTI 7.261030.1: indicator lifecycle kept on low-confidence upsert
- 3d agoOpenCTIOpenCTI 7.261030.0: Hub import for views, manual coverage updates
- 7d agoOpenCTIOpenCTI 7.261026.0: bulk-update and dashboard access fixes
- 10d agoOpenCTIOpenCTI 7.261023.1: saved-filter switching fix
- 10d agoOpenCTIOpenCTI 7.261023.0: keyboard graph control, grouping, SVG export
- 12d agoOpenCTIOpenCTI 7.261021.1: XTM One outputs in Ask Ariane, graph refresh
- 24d agoDeepnotePrivate and shared projects can live in the same folder
- 4mo agoDeepnoteNew MCP tools for integrations
- 5mo agoDeepnoteYour workspace as the context for every exploration ⚡
- 6mo agoDeepnoteRun snapshots, Git sync, Polars support, PDF export, & a cleaner notebook
- 6mo agoDeepnoteRun snapshots, Git sync, & AI usage visibility
- 6mo agoDeepnoteRun snapshots, Git sync, Polars support, PDF export, & a cleaner notebook
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Deepnote and OpenCTI?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. OpenCTI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Deepnote better than OpenCTI?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenCTI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Deepnote?
Top Deepnote alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Deepnote alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/deepnote for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to OpenCTI?
Top OpenCTI alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenCTI alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/opencti for the full list with editorial commentary on each.