nuggets
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
cvms vs EDAForge
A side-by-side editorial comparison of cvms and EDAForge — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
cvms vs EDAForge: at a glance
What is cvms?
A cross-validation package whose real development has moved to its plotting function
cvms runs repeated cross-validation over model formulas and reports comparable metrics. The 2.0.0 release was a breaking correctness fix: every function accepting fold_cols mismatched training and testing data when fold indices were non-sequential, did not start at 1, or were strings, because the iteration index was compared against the raw fold value rather than its factor level index. 2.0.1 restored coefficient extraction for nnet::multinom and mixed models by supplying an environment containing the training data, and followed lme4's move of findbars() into the reformulas package.
What is EDAForge?
EDAForge is a data-quality auditor renamed mid-flight, still finding its CRAN footing.
EDAForge's release feed shows a package changing identity between its first two tags. The v0.1.0 notes describe DataAudit, a data-quality auditing package built around audit_data(), reusable audit_rules() and audit_score(), with install instructions still pointing at vinodhpmd/DataAudit, while the repository now serves EDAForge. Only three tags exist, one of which is a bare compare link with no notes, and the most recent is a CRAN-policy cleanup rather than feature work.
cvms vs EDAForge: editorial side-by-side
cvms
0.0INFRA · APIS
A cross-validation package whose real development has moved to its plotting function
◆ Current state
cvms runs repeated cross-validation over model formulas and reports comparable metrics. The 2.0.0 release was a breaking correctness fix: every function accepting fold_cols mismatched training and testing data when fold indices were non-sequential, did not start at 1, or were strings, because the iteration index was compared against the raw fold value rather than its factor level index. 2.0.1 restored coefficient extraction for nnet::multinom and mixed models by supplying an environment containing the training data, and followed lme4's move of findbars() into the reformulas package.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run in parallel and only one is about cross-validation. The plotting function plot_confusion_matrix() has absorbed most feature work since 1.5.0 - custom gradient palettes, intensity limits, per-tile settings, dynamic font colors keyed to value thresholds, and arguments that accept functions rather than constants - to the point where a companion web application exists for using it without code. The cross-validation core, by contrast, sees maintenance: upstream compatibility fixes for pROC, ggnewscale and ggplot2, and the fold-matching correction that finally forced a major version.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued option growth in the confusion matrix plotting surface, since that is where nearly every release since 1.5.0 has spent its changes, with core cross-validation changes arriving only as upstream packages force them.
EDAForge
5.0INFRA · APIS
EDAForge is a data-quality auditor renamed mid-flight, still finding its CRAN footing.
◆ Current state
EDAForge's release feed shows a package changing identity between its first two tags. The v0.1.0 notes describe DataAudit, a data-quality auditing package built around audit_data(), reusable audit_rules() and audit_score(), with install instructions still pointing at vinodhpmd/DataAudit, while the repository now serves EDAForge. Only three tags exist, one of which is a bare compare link with no notes, and the most recent is a CRAN-policy cleanup rather than feature work.
◆ Where it's heading
The substance so far is all in the DataAudit-named 0.1.0: more than a dozen check families spanning missing values, duplicates, ranges, patterns, dependencies and grouped sequences, wrapped in a structured report object with print and summary methods. The 0.1.1 that follows removes a default output path, moves examples to tempdir() and adds an introductory vignette, which is the standard shape of a package being made acceptable to CRAN. The public identity is currently ahead of the release notes, so a reader arriving at the feed cannot tell from it what EDAForge does.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next tag to align the notes with the EDAForge name and add exploratory-analysis functions alongside the auditing core; the compliance pass in 0.1.1 points at a CRAN submission as the near-term goal.
Alternatives to cvms and EDAForge
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cvms or EDAForge.
projoint
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
eratosthenes
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
lifecontingencies
An actuarial mainstay spends its releases on CI plumbing, not on new mathematics.
inti
inti keeps compounding small statistics and publishing tools for plant-science labs.
See all cvms alternatives → · See all EDAForge alternatives →
Recent activity from cvms and EDAForge
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 18d agoEDAForgeCRAN-policy pass: no default write path, intro vignette
- 22d agoEDAForgeInitial release under the package's former name, DataAudit
- 27d agoEDAForgeEDAForge v0.1.0
- 2mo agocvmsCoefficient extraction restored for multinom and mixed models
- 9mo agocvmsBreaking fix for mismatched folds with non-sequential fold IDs
- 11mo agocvmsTest compatibility with pROC 1.19 and a deprecation warning fix
- 1y agocvmsConfusion matrix fonts and colors can now be computed from the values
- 1y agocvmsTile intensity by row or column percentages
- 1y agocvmsMultinom coefficient extraction fix after a parameters update
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between cvms and EDAForge?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. EDAForge is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is cvms better than EDAForge?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. EDAForge is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to cvms?
Top cvms alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cvms alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cvms for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to EDAForge?
Top EDAForge alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "EDAForge alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/edaforge for the full list with editorial commentary on each.