PurpleAir
The R client for PurpleAir sensors keeps finding its time-averaging was wrong.
Comparison · Analytics
cTMed vs rATTAINS
A side-by-side editorial comparison of cTMed and rATTAINS — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
cTMed vs rATTAINS: at a glance
What is cTMed?
Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work
cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.
What is rATTAINS?
The R client for EPA water quality data spent two releases undoing its own promises about data shape.
rATTAINS wraps the EPA's ATTAINS API, which holds state water quality assessments and impaired-waters listings. The package reached 1.0.0 by promising stable, consistently rectangled return structures, then walked that promise back in 1.1.0 when it dropped the dependency doing the rectangling. As of 1.2.0 it also requires an API key, because ATTAINS itself began requiring one in May 2026.
cTMed vs rATTAINS: editorial side-by-side
cTMed
2.5ANALYTICS
Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work
◆ Current state
cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is filling out a matrix rather than changing shape: for each effect type there is a delta-method, a Monte Carlo and a bootstrap path, and each release closes another cell. The 2025 releases were largely externally forced — an Armadillo 15.0.x transition at CRAN, a citation addition after the Psychological Methods paper landed — which suggests the statistical core has been settled since the 1.0.6 standardization revision.
◆ Prediction
The diagonal-sigma option has now reached the standardized estimators; extending it to the remaining unstandardized variants is the obvious next cell to fill.
rATTAINS
0.0ANALYTICS
The R client for EPA water quality data spent two releases undoing its own promises about data shape.
◆ Current state
rATTAINS wraps the EPA's ATTAINS API, which holds state water quality assessments and impaired-waters listings. The package reached 1.0.0 by promising stable, consistently rectangled return structures, then walked that promise back in 1.1.0 when it dropped the dependency doing the rectangling. As of 1.2.0 it also requires an API key, because ATTAINS itself began requiring one in May 2026.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction is toward a thinner, lower-maintenance wrapper. Caching went in 0.1.4 when hoardr was archived, tidyjson and janitor went earlier, tibblify went in 1.1.0, and each removal handed a little more data-shaping responsibility back to the user — the current advice is to pass .unnest = FALSE and rectangle the results with whatever tidying package you prefer. Release cadence is slow and mostly reactive: upstream API terms, archived dependencies, and compatibility with test tooling account for most of the log. The package's centre of gravity is staying installable and honest about what ATTAINS returns rather than smoothing it over.
◆ Prediction
Given the pattern, the next release is likelier to be a compatibility or upstream-driven fix than new endpoint coverage; how the API key requirement affects users in scripted and CI contexts is the obvious open question the entries do not yet answer.
Alternatives to cTMed and rATTAINS
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cTMed or rATTAINS.
piecepackr
A board game graphics package runs one of the most disciplined deprecation cycles in R.
e2tree
The explainable-ensemble-tree package now measures whether its own explanations are faithful.
discretefdr
The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.
contentanalysis
A scientific-text analysis package moved from counting citations to classifying argument structure.
relialearnr
The teaching arm of an R reliability suite keeps pace with whatever its analysis siblings ship.
See all cTMed alternatives → · See all rATTAINS alternatives →
Recent activity from cTMed and rATTAINS
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 27d agocTMedStandardized centrality measures and diagonal-sigma support
- 1mo agorATTAINSATTAINS now requires an API key, and the package follows
- 6mo agocTMedMinor method edits
- 8mo agorATTAINSThe tibblify dependency goes, and with it the stable data shapes ⚡
- 10mo agocTMedPackage citation added for the Psychological Methods paper
- 10mo agocTMedArmadillo 15.0.x compatibility for CRAN
- 1y agorATTAINSTest suite updated for vcr v2
- 1y agocTMedStandardization reworked around the steady-state covariance matrix
- 1y agocTMedBootstrap centrality estimators and MCPhiSigma()
- 3y agorATTAINS1.0.0 commits to stable return structures via tibblify
- 3y agorATTAINSCaching removed after hoardr was archived
- 4y agorATTAINSRequests retry on timeout, with offline detection
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between cTMed and rATTAINS?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. cTMed is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is cTMed better than rATTAINS?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cTMed is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to cTMed?
Top cTMed alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cTMed alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ctmed for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rATTAINS?
Top rATTAINS alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rATTAINS alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rattains for the full list with editorial commentary on each.