tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
crul vs textshaping
A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and textshaping — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
crul vs textshaping: at a glance
What is crul?
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
What is textshaping?
Rewrote its shaping engine for bidirectional text, then spent a year fixing what that broke.
textshaping is the text layout layer beneath R's modern graphics stack, feeding ragg, ggplot2 and marquee. Version 1.0.0 rewrote the shaping engine to honour the global direction of text, adding a direction argument that defaults to automatic detection, align settings that resolve against that direction, and ICU-based soft break locations that handle ideographic scripts properly. The five releases since have been consecutive bug fixes against that rewrite — bidi embedding arrangement, line positioning with mixed sizes, a weak hash in the shape cache, a signed integer overflow, and font fallback regressions.
crul vs textshaping: editorial side-by-side
crul
0.0ANALYTICS
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
◆ Current state
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
◆ Where it's heading
The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.
◆ Prediction
With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.
textshaping
0.0ANALYTICS
Rewrote its shaping engine for bidirectional text, then spent a year fixing what that broke.
◆ Current state
textshaping is the text layout layer beneath R's modern graphics stack, feeding ragg, ggplot2 and marquee. Version 1.0.0 rewrote the shaping engine to honour the global direction of text, adding a direction argument that defaults to automatic detection, align settings that resolve against that direction, and ICU-based soft break locations that handle ideographic scripts properly. The five releases since have been consecutive bug fixes against that rewrite — bidi embedding arrangement, line positioning with mixed sizes, a weak hash in the shape cache, a signed integer overflow, and font fallback regressions.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has moved from Latin-first layout to script-agnostic layout in two rewrites, 0.4.0 and 1.0.0, and is now in the long correctness tail that follows. The bug reports arriving from ggplot2, ragg and marquee issue numbers show how it works in practice: textshaping bugs surface as rendering defects in the packages above it, which is why so many fixes here cite another package's issue tracker.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued fixes driven by downstream rendering reports rather than new layout features, as the 1.0.x series stabilises. The font fallback path has produced two of the recent bugs and is the most likely source of the next.
Alternatives to crul and textshaping
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or textshaping.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all crul alternatives → · See all textshaping alternatives →
Recent activity from crul and textshaping
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5mo agotextshapingFixes reverting between font fallbacks
- 9mo agotextshapingGuards against freetype version mismatches with systemfonts
- 11mo agotextshapingFixes a signed integer overflow in the previous fix
- 11mo agotextshapingFixes bidi single-line shaping and a weak shape-cache hash
- 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr ⚡
- 1y agotextshapingFixes hard line breaks across multiple embeddings
- 1y agotextshapingShaping engine rewritten to honour global text direction ⚡
- 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
- 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
- 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
- 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
- 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between crul and textshaping?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. crul and textshaping are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is crul better than textshaping?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crul and textshaping are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to crul?
Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to textshaping?
Top textshaping alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "textshaping alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/textshaping for the full list with editorial commentary on each.