tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
hoardr vs textshaping
A side-by-side editorial comparison of hoardr and textshaping — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
hoardr vs textshaping: at a glance
What is hoardr?
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
hoardr manages local cache directories for other R packages — where files go, how they are keyed, whether they exist. It underpins caching in several rOpenSci data clients. The last functional additions were in 2018; everything since is a patch issued because CRAN reported a test failure or the maintainer changed.
What is textshaping?
Rewrote its shaping engine for bidirectional text, then spent a year fixing what that broke.
textshaping is the text layout layer beneath R's modern graphics stack, feeding ragg, ggplot2 and marquee. Version 1.0.0 rewrote the shaping engine to honour the global direction of text, adding a direction argument that defaults to automatic detection, align settings that resolve against that direction, and ICU-based soft break locations that handle ideographic scripts properly. The five releases since have been consecutive bug fixes against that rewrite — bidi embedding arrangement, line positioning with mixed sizes, a weak hash in the shape cache, a signed integer overflow, and font fallback regressions.
hoardr vs textshaping: editorial side-by-side
hoardr
0.0ANALYTICS
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
◆ Current state
hoardr manages local cache directories for other R packages — where files go, how they are keyed, whether they exist. It underpins caching in several rOpenSci data clients. The last functional additions were in 2018; everything since is a patch issued because CRAN reported a test failure or the maintainer changed.
◆ Where it's heading
This is infrastructure that has reached its final shape. Three of the last three releases were reactive: two responses to CRAN test-failure notifications, one to a maintainer handover. The single behavioural change in that stretch — forward slashes in paths on every operating system — is a consistency fix for downstream packages rather than a feature. Its release cadence is set by CRAN's checks, not by demand.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to be triggered by another CRAN check failure rather than by new functionality, matching every release since 2018.
textshaping
0.0ANALYTICS
Rewrote its shaping engine for bidirectional text, then spent a year fixing what that broke.
◆ Current state
textshaping is the text layout layer beneath R's modern graphics stack, feeding ragg, ggplot2 and marquee. Version 1.0.0 rewrote the shaping engine to honour the global direction of text, adding a direction argument that defaults to automatic detection, align settings that resolve against that direction, and ICU-based soft break locations that handle ideographic scripts properly. The five releases since have been consecutive bug fixes against that rewrite — bidi embedding arrangement, line positioning with mixed sizes, a weak hash in the shape cache, a signed integer overflow, and font fallback regressions.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has moved from Latin-first layout to script-agnostic layout in two rewrites, 0.4.0 and 1.0.0, and is now in the long correctness tail that follows. The bug reports arriving from ggplot2, ragg and marquee issue numbers show how it works in practice: textshaping bugs surface as rendering defects in the packages above it, which is why so many fixes here cite another package's issue tracker.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued fixes driven by downstream rendering reports rather than new layout features, as the 1.0.x series stabilises. The font fallback path has produced two of the recent bugs and is the most likely source of the next.
Alternatives to hoardr and textshaping
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either hoardr or textshaping.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
datasetjson
datasetjson rebuilt its object model to track the CDISC Dataset-JSON 1.1 schema.
See all hoardr alternatives → · See all textshaping alternatives →
Recent activity from hoardr and textshaping
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5mo agotextshapingFixes reverting between font fallbacks
- 9mo agotextshapingGuards against freetype version mismatches with systemfonts
- 11mo agotextshapingFixes a signed integer overflow in the previous fix
- 11mo agotextshapingFixes bidi single-line shaping and a weak shape-cache hash
- 1y agotextshapingFixes hard line breaks across multiple embeddings
- 1y agotextshapingShaping engine rewritten to honour global text direction ⚡
- 1y agohoardrPaths use forward slashes on every platform
- 2y agohoardrTest-only patch for a CRAN failure
- 3y agohoardrPatch release for maintainer handover
- 7y agohoardrFixes cache paths leaking between HoardClient instances
- 7y agohoardrFile-existence checks and full-path cache configuration
- 9y agohoardrCRAN disk-writing policy compliance
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between hoardr and textshaping?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. hoardr and textshaping are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is hoardr better than textshaping?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. hoardr and textshaping are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to hoardr?
Top hoardr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "hoardr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hoardr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to textshaping?
Top textshaping alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "textshaping alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/textshaping for the full list with editorial commentary on each.