tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
crul vs nanonext
A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and nanonext — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
crul vs nanonext: at a glance
What is crul?
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
What is nanonext?
nanonext keeps shrinking its build requirements while adding messaging primitives.
The R binding to NNG ships roughly monthly. Since February the package added an HTTP server that can run synchronously or through the later event loop, a zero-copy device forwarder for building brokers and proxies, and support for pthread-enabled WebAssembly targets. Send operations now move the buffer straight into the NNG message, halving peak memory on serialized sends.
crul vs nanonext: editorial side-by-side
crul
0.0ANALYTICS
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
◆ Current state
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
◆ Where it's heading
The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.
◆ Prediction
With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.
nanonext
2.5ANALYTICS
nanonext keeps shrinking its build requirements while adding messaging primitives.
◆ Current state
The R binding to NNG ships roughly monthly. Since February the package added an HTTP server that can run synchronously or through the later event loop, a zero-copy device forwarder for building brokers and proxies, and support for pthread-enabled WebAssembly targets. Send operations now move the buffer straight into the NNG message, halving peak memory on serialized sends.
◆ Where it's heading
Two directions run in parallel. One is making the package installable anywhere — the build-time cmake dependency is gone, so compiling bundled NNG and Mbed TLS needs only a C compiler, and WebAssembly targets are supported. The other is raising the ceiling on what can be built on top: device_aio() for message forwarding, an HTTP and WebSocket server with a content map, and stream buffer control. Bug fixes in recent releases concentrate on memory safety in the bundled C sources.
◆ Prediction
Given the pace and the tight coupling declared in each release, expect the next version to track a mirai requirement and continue hardening the HTTP server paths that the last two releases have been leaking memory in.
Alternatives to crul and nanonext
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or nanonext.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all crul alternatives → · See all nanonext alternatives →
Recent activity from crul and nanonext
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 10d agonanonextMemory leaks and a TLS use-after-free fixed in the HTTP server
- 1mo agonanonextEvent-loop integration for HTTP and WebSocket callbacks
- 1mo agonanonextZero-copy message forwarding, and cmake dropped from the build ⚡
- 2mo agonanonextBuilds against pthread-enabled WebAssembly targets
- 3mo agonanonextSerialized sends drop a copy and halve peak memory
- 4mo agonanonextBlocking HTTP server mode and stream buffer sizing
- 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr ⚡
- 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
- 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
- 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
- 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
- 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between crul and nanonext?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. nanonext is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is crul better than nanonext?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. nanonext is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to crul?
Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to nanonext?
Top nanonext alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "nanonext alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nanonext for the full list with editorial commentary on each.