tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of hoardr and nanonext — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
hoardr manages local cache directories for other R packages — where files go, how they are keyed, whether they exist. It underpins caching in several rOpenSci data clients. The last functional additions were in 2018; everything since is a patch issued because CRAN reported a test failure or the maintainer changed.
nanonext keeps shrinking its build requirements while adding messaging primitives.
The R binding to NNG ships roughly monthly. Since February the package added an HTTP server that can run synchronously or through the later event loop, a zero-copy device forwarder for building brokers and proxies, and support for pthread-enabled WebAssembly targets. Send operations now move the buffer straight into the NNG message, halving peak memory on serialized sends.
hoardr manages local cache directories for other R packages — where files go, how they are keyed, whether they exist. It underpins caching in several rOpenSci data clients. The last functional additions were in 2018; everything since is a patch issued because CRAN reported a test failure or the maintainer changed.
This is infrastructure that has reached its final shape. Three of the last three releases were reactive: two responses to CRAN test-failure notifications, one to a maintainer handover. The single behavioural change in that stretch — forward slashes in paths on every operating system — is a consistency fix for downstream packages rather than a feature. Its release cadence is set by CRAN's checks, not by demand.
Expect the next release to be triggered by another CRAN check failure rather than by new functionality, matching every release since 2018.
The R binding to NNG ships roughly monthly. Since February the package added an HTTP server that can run synchronously or through the later event loop, a zero-copy device forwarder for building brokers and proxies, and support for pthread-enabled WebAssembly targets. Send operations now move the buffer straight into the NNG message, halving peak memory on serialized sends.
Two directions run in parallel. One is making the package installable anywhere — the build-time cmake dependency is gone, so compiling bundled NNG and Mbed TLS needs only a C compiler, and WebAssembly targets are supported. The other is raising the ceiling on what can be built on top: device_aio() for message forwarding, an HTTP and WebSocket server with a content map, and stream buffer control. Bug fixes in recent releases concentrate on memory safety in the bundled C sources.
Given the pace and the tight coupling declared in each release, expect the next version to track a mirai requirement and continue hardening the HTTP server paths that the last two releases have been leaking memory in.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either hoardr or nanonext.
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
datasetjson rebuilt its object model to track the CDISC Dataset-JSON 1.1 schema.
See all hoardr alternatives → · See all nanonext alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. nanonext is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. nanonext is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top hoardr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "hoardr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hoardr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top nanonext alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "nanonext alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nanonext for the full list with editorial commentary on each.