Oh Dear
Oh Dear's weekly changelogs have carried a security section five weeks running.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
CrowdSec vs Honeycomb
A side-by-side editorial comparison of CrowdSec and Honeycomb — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
CrowdSec vs Honeycomb: at a glance
| Feature | CrowdSec | Honeycomb |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Infra & APIs | Infra & APIs |
| Velocity score | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | waf, bot-detection, security, fingerprinting | observability, onboarding, canvas-agents, mcp |
| Last editorial update | 1h ago | 2h ago |
| Website | Visit → | — |
What is CrowdSec?
CrowdSec's 1.8.2 candidates let operators write their own bot fingerprints.
The bot detection introduced with 1.8 is now being opened to customization. The 1.8.2 candidates add custom JavaScript fingerprinting, a cscli bot subcommand and a FlagSubmission helper, and rc2 adds a RateLimit helper for the WAF plus a cookie option for embedded contexts. Operational work runs alongside it: a cs_features metric, optional limits on concurrent decision streams and TLS certificate reloads.
What is Honeycomb?
Honeycomb is working on the first ten minutes, not just the incident
Honeycomb's latest releases focus on getting new users to value quickly. A guided setup wizard recommends MCP as the route for sending data, and Data Pulse (Beta) then reads incoming telemetry, describes the system and suggests questions to ask. Canvas keeps deepening alongside this: agent replies link directly to the charts they generate, and the GitHub connector now authorizes once per team. Agents can also create SLO Burn Alerts and reset budgets through MCP.
CrowdSec vs Honeycomb: editorial side-by-side
CrowdSec
5.0INFRA · APIS
CrowdSec's 1.8.2 candidates let operators write their own bot fingerprints.
◆ Current state
The bot detection introduced with 1.8 is now being opened to customization. The 1.8.2 candidates add custom JavaScript fingerprinting, a cscli bot subcommand and a FlagSubmission helper, and rc2 adds a RateLimit helper for the WAF plus a cookie option for embedded contexts. Operational work runs alongside it: a cs_features metric, optional limits on concurrent decision streams and TLS certificate reloads.
◆ Where it's heading
The WAF remains the center of gravity, and the direction is programmability. RateLimit, SkipProcessing and the fingerprinting hooks give rule authors primitives rather than fixed behavior. The LAPI changes point at larger deployments, where decision streaming puts load on the central API.
◆ Prediction
The final 1.8.2 is dated 26 October on GitHub, though it has not reached this feed yet. Whether fingerprint data ever joins the community blocklist remains unanswered in these notes.
Honeycomb
5.0INFRA · APIS
Honeycomb is working on the first ten minutes, not just the incident
◆ Current state
Honeycomb's latest releases focus on getting new users to value quickly. A guided setup wizard recommends MCP as the route for sending data, and Data Pulse (Beta) then reads incoming telemetry, describes the system and suggests questions to ask. Canvas keeps deepening alongside this: agent replies link directly to the charts they generate, and the GitHub connector now authorizes once per team. Agents can also create SLO Burn Alerts and reset budgets through MCP.
◆ Where it's heading
The agent-first direction now runs through onboarding as well as investigation. Recommending MCP over the OpenTelemetry SDK as the default path is the clearest signal yet that Honeycomb expects an agent to do the instrumentation. Write access for SLOs through MCP extends the same logic to alert management, while team-wide connectors remove setup work that each Canvas user previously had to repeat.
◆ Prediction
Data Pulse is in beta and is the obvious candidate for wider rollout, likely with more system types recognized. Further MCP write tools for monitoring objects would continue the pattern set by Burn Alerts.
Alternatives to CrowdSec and Honeycomb
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either CrowdSec or Honeycomb.
Apache ShenYu
ShenYu's AI gateway plugins are back in motion, with 2.7.2 candidate tags in October.
TestingBot
TestingBot's autumn work is plumbing: a rebuilt tunnel and another bug-tracker link.
KubeArmor
KubeArmor ships fixes as release-candidate tags, and its feed misses the finals.
All Quiet
All Quiet moves from enterprise integrations to the on-call engineer's own day.
Robusta
Robusta's recent releases patch its runner image rather than add features.
See all CrowdSec alternatives → · See all Honeycomb alternatives →
Recent activity from CrowdSec and Honeycomb
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2d agoHoneycombData Pulse (Beta): Personalized ways to explore your data
- 2d agoHoneycombGuided setup for sending data to Honeycomb
- 4d agoHoneycombCanvas now connects to GitHub through the Honeycomb GitHub App
- 4d agoHoneycombCanvas Agent Responses Link to Shapes
- 10d agoCrowdSec1.8.2 rc2 adds a WAF RateLimit helper and decision stream limits
- 16d agoHoneycombMinimum password length is now 16 characters
- 19d agoCrowdSec1.8.2 rc1 adds custom JS fingerprinting for bot detection
- 1mo agoHoneycombManage SLO Burn Alerts and Budget Resets with MCP
- 2mo agoCrowdSec1.8 rc2 tunes the bot-detection challenge, hardens acquisition
- 3mo agoCrowdSecCrowdSec 1.8 RC adds WAF bot detection and a Kubernetes datasource ⚡
- 6mo agoCrowdSec1.7.8 RC: OpenAPI schema validation in the WAF
- 7mo agoCrowdSec1.7.7 RC: flexible WAF rule conditions and RE2 by default
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between CrowdSec and Honeycomb?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. CrowdSec and Honeycomb are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is CrowdSec better than Honeycomb?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. CrowdSec and Honeycomb are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to CrowdSec?
Top CrowdSec alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "CrowdSec alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crowdsec for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Honeycomb?
Top Honeycomb alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Honeycomb alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/honeycomb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.