pins
pins keeps adding a storage backend per release while retiring its original API
Comparison · Analytics
Countly vs see
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Countly and see — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Countly vs see: at a glance
What is Countly?
Countly's LTS line is spending its releases on hardening the surfaces customers extend.
The 25.03 LTS and 24.05 branches are moving together, and the recent content is dominated by security and scoping work rather than features. The latest LTS rebuilds the api and frontend Docker images as multi-stage builds on Debian 13 with Node 24 so compilers and build tooling no longer ship, overrides fourteen vulnerable transitive dependencies, and replaces the unmaintained v8-sandbox behind custom code with isolated-vm. Earlier releases scoped internal event hooks to their own apps, fixed the consents table returning fields beyond the consent columns, and stopped dashboard widgets being copied by users without access to the referenced apps.
What is see?
see grows wherever easystats adds a diagnostic, one plot method at a time.
see is the visualization layer for the easystats ecosystem, supplying plot() methods for performance, parameters and datawizard objects. Each release adds methods for whatever those packages shipped — prior predictive checks, DAG diagrams, factor-analysis graphs — alongside steady theme and geom refinement.
Countly vs see: editorial side-by-side
Countly
5.0ANALYTICS
Countly's LTS line is spending its releases on hardening the surfaces customers extend.
◆ Current state
The 25.03 LTS and 24.05 branches are moving together, and the recent content is dominated by security and scoping work rather than features. The latest LTS rebuilds the api and frontend Docker images as multi-stage builds on Debian 13 with Node 24 so compilers and build tooling no longer ship, overrides fourteen vulnerable transitive dependencies, and replaces the unmaintained v8-sandbox behind custom code with isolated-vm. Earlier releases scoped internal event hooks to their own apps, fixed the consents table returning fields beyond the consent columns, and stopped dashboard widgets being copied by users without access to the referenced apps.
◆ Where it's heading
The pattern across these releases is closing the gaps where a customer-supplied artefact — custom hook code, a copied widget, a projection on a request — could reach further than intended. That work is now touching the runtime itself, and the isolated-vm swap is a breaking change: custom code relying on setTimeout, setInterval or async completion fails with a logged error instead of running. The journey engine is the only place shipping genuinely new capability, and it is enterprise-only.
◆ Prediction
Expect follow-up releases to soften the custom-code migration, since the isolated-vm switch silently breaks any hook that awaited a timer, and further ab-testing work now that pystan has been replaced with compiled Stan executables.
see
0.0ANALYTICS
see grows wherever easystats adds a diagnostic, one plot method at a time.
◆ Current state
see is the visualization layer for the easystats ecosystem, supplying plot() methods for performance, parameters and datawizard objects. Each release adds methods for whatever those packages shipped — prior predictive checks, DAG diagrams, factor-analysis graphs — alongside steady theme and geom refinement.
◆ Where it's heading
Growth here is downstream-driven rather than self-directed: see expands to cover new diagnostics as easystats produces them. Running alongside that is a sustained investment in presentation control — theme arguments on plot methods, elements that scale with base_size — which suits users embedding these plots in documents rather than glancing at them interactively.
◆ Prediction
Expect new plot methods to keep arriving in step with performance and parameters releases, with continued theming work rather than any change in the package's scope.
Alternatives to Countly and see
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Countly or see.
tsibble
tsibble shipped one release in five and a half years - the data structure is finished
yardstick
yardstick made fairness metrics a first-class part of tidymodels evaluation
tune
tune extends tuning past the model itself to postprocessors, and adds a second parallel backend
leaflet
leaflet relicensed to MIT and finished migrating off R's retired spatial stack
ggpubr
ggpubr reached 1.0.0 with p-value formatting presets for specific journals
Recent activity from Countly and see
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoCountlyCustom-code sandbox swapped to isolated-vm; images rebuilt on Node 24
- 9d agoCountlyFixes for event keys containing special characters
- 9d agoCountlyJourney deeplinks take dynamic parameters; hooks validated on save
- 20d agoCountlyStar-rating logo path and data-manager transformation fixes
- 21d agoCountlyLTS backport: data-manager transformation fix
- 1mo agoCountlyJourneys survive user merges; SDK-provided asset paths
- 1mo agoseesee 0.14.1 adds plots for prior checks and grouped means
- 2mo agoseesee 0.14.0 renders factor loadings as node-edge graphs
- 6mo agoseesee 0.13.0 fixes reversed plot sorting, adds theme arguments
- 11mo agoseesee 0.12.0 extends normality checks to psych factor models
- 1y agoseesee 0.11.0 scales theme elements with base_size
- 1y agoseesee 0.10.0 plots random-effect group levels for mixed models
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Countly and see?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Countly is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Countly better than see?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Countly is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Countly?
Top Countly alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Countly alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/countly for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to see?
Top see alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "see alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/see-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.