← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Countly vs leaflet

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Countly and leaflet — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Countly vs leaflet: at a glance

FeatureCountlyleaflet
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score5.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesproduct-analytics, self-hosted, security-hardening, sandboxingmapping, geospatial, sf-migration, licensing
Last editorial update8h ago46m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Countly?

Countly's LTS line is spending its releases on hardening the surfaces customers extend.

The 25.03 LTS and 24.05 branches are moving together, and the recent content is dominated by security and scoping work rather than features. The latest LTS rebuilds the api and frontend Docker images as multi-stage builds on Debian 13 with Node 24 so compilers and build tooling no longer ship, overrides fourteen vulnerable transitive dependencies, and replaces the unmaintained v8-sandbox behind custom code with isolated-vm. Earlier releases scoped internal event hooks to their own apps, fixed the consents table returning fields beyond the consent columns, and stopped dashboard widgets being copied by users without access to the referenced apps.

Read the full Countly trajectory →

What is leaflet?

leaflet relicensed to MIT and finished migrating off R's retired spatial stack

leaflet is the R binding for the Leaflet mapping library. Its recent releases are dominated by one long migration: away from sp, rgdal, rgeos and raster, and toward sf and terra. Version 2.2.3 completed the user-facing half of that - sp is no longer installed by default, and bundled datasets ship as sf objects - while also relicensing the package from GPL-2 to MIT.

Read the full leaflet trajectory →

Countly vs leaflet: editorial side-by-side

C
Countly
ANALYTICS
5.0

Countly's LTS line is spending its releases on hardening the surfaces customers extend.

◆ Current state

The 25.03 LTS and 24.05 branches are moving together, and the recent content is dominated by security and scoping work rather than features. The latest LTS rebuilds the api and frontend Docker images as multi-stage builds on Debian 13 with Node 24 so compilers and build tooling no longer ship, overrides fourteen vulnerable transitive dependencies, and replaces the unmaintained v8-sandbox behind custom code with isolated-vm. Earlier releases scoped internal event hooks to their own apps, fixed the consents table returning fields beyond the consent columns, and stopped dashboard widgets being copied by users without access to the referenced apps.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern across these releases is closing the gaps where a customer-supplied artefact — custom hook code, a copied widget, a projection on a request — could reach further than intended. That work is now touching the runtime itself, and the isolated-vm swap is a breaking change: custom code relying on setTimeout, setInterval or async completion fails with a logged error instead of running. The journey engine is the only place shipping genuinely new capability, and it is enterprise-only.

◆ Prediction

Expect follow-up releases to soften the custom-code migration, since the isolated-vm switch silently breaks any hook that awaited a timer, and further ab-testing work now that pystan has been replaced with compiled Stan executables.

L
leaflet
ANALYTICS
0.0

leaflet relicensed to MIT and finished migrating off R's retired spatial stack

◆ Current state

leaflet is the R binding for the Leaflet mapping library. Its recent releases are dominated by one long migration: away from sp, rgdal, rgeos and raster, and toward sf and terra. Version 2.2.3 completed the user-facing half of that - sp is no longer installed by default, and bundled datasets ship as sf objects - while also relicensing the package from GPL-2 to MIT.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a package being brought into line with an ecosystem that changed underneath it. The retirement of rgdal and rgeos forced the terra and sf work; the license change and dependency reductions are the maintainers taking the opportunity to clean up while they are already in there. Feature work, such as the full viridisLite palette set, arrives as a side effect of the tidying.

◆ Prediction

With the sp path now opt-in and the retired geospatial dependencies gone, expect the remaining work to be small: palette and provider-tile handling, and keeping the bundled JavaScript current.

Alternatives to Countly and leaflet

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Countly or leaflet.

See all Countly alternatives → · See all leaflet alternatives →

Recent activity from Countly and leaflet

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoCountlyCustom-code sandbox swapped to isolated-vm; images rebuilt on Node 24
  2. 9d agoCountlyFixes for event keys containing special characters
  3. 9d agoCountlyJourney deeplinks take dynamic parameters; hooks validated on save
  4. 20d agoCountlyStar-rating logo path and data-manager transformation fixes
  5. 21d agoCountlyLTS backport: data-manager transformation fix
  6. 1mo agoCountlyJourneys survive user merges; SDK-provided asset paths
  7. 11mo agoleafletMIT relicensing and sp dropped from default installs
  8. 2y agoleafletterra CRS handling fixed; raster images accept layer options
  9. 2y agoleafletProvider tile dependency is cacheable by knitr again
  10. 2y agoleafletAdds terra support and removes rgdal and rgeos
  11. 3y agoleafletUpdates proj4.js and fixes examples to stay on CRAN

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Countly and leaflet?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Countly is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Countly better than leaflet?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Countly is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Countly?

Top Countly alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Countly alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/countly for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to leaflet?

Top leaflet alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "leaflet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/leaflet-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.