Sanity
Sanity's MCP server hits v2.33 with safer publishing guards as Studio bug-fix cadence accelerates
Comparison · DevOps
Convex vs Rivet
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Convex and Rivet — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Convex vs Rivet: at a glance
| Feature | Convex | Rivet |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | DevOps | DevOps |
| Velocity score | 2.5 | 8.8 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 3 |
| Top themes | funding, reactive-backend, enterprise, agents | actor-model, byoc, mcp, agent-infrastructure |
| Last editorial update | 1mo ago | 1d ago |
| Website | Visit → | — |
What is Convex?
Convex raised $57M on the argument that agents need a backend built for them.
The feed is thin on releases and heavy on company milestones. A $57M Series B led by Insight Partners is the newest item, pitched around developers and their agents writing software together and needing a backend that keeps up. The substantive product news remains April's Convex for Enterprise, which added the compliance and scale posture the platform previously lacked; since then the feed carries a conference announcement and open-source recaps rather than shipped capability.
What is Rivet?
Rivet positions its Actors runtime as the infrastructure layer for enterprise-ready, AI-native application deployment.
Rivet has shipped three substantive capability moves in rapid succession: BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud, letting enterprises run Rivet's control plane inside their own AWS or GCP VPCs), MCP integration (exposing Rivet Actors as a first-class tool in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI), and Dynamic Apps (a V8-isolate-based runtime for deploying AI-generated applications for end users). Underneath all of this is the Actors model — a durable, stateful compute primitive built on open-source infrastructure. Durable Streams, a zero-disk SQLite storage engine with S3 tiering, and the agentOS execution API round out the technical foundation.
Convex vs Rivet: editorial side-by-side
Convex
2.5DEVOPS
Convex raised $57M on the argument that agents need a backend built for them.
◆ Current state
The feed is thin on releases and heavy on company milestones. A $57M Series B led by Insight Partners is the newest item, pitched around developers and their agents writing software together and needing a backend that keeps up. The substantive product news remains April's Convex for Enterprise, which added the compliance and scale posture the platform previously lacked; since then the feed carries a conference announcement and open-source recaps rather than shipped capability.
◆ Where it's heading
Convex is funding and positioning ahead of shipping. The enterprise release established the upmarket motion and the funding narrative attaches it to agent-written code, but nothing in the visible window shows the agent-facing product surface that framing implies. Whether that framing is real or aspirational is not something this feed answers yet.
◆ Prediction
With the round announced around agent workloads, the next substantive release is most likely on that surface, though the entries here give no detail on what form it takes.
Rivet
8.8DEVOPS
Rivet positions its Actors runtime as the infrastructure layer for enterprise-ready, AI-native application deployment.
◆ Current state
Rivet has shipped three substantive capability moves in rapid succession: BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud, letting enterprises run Rivet's control plane inside their own AWS or GCP VPCs), MCP integration (exposing Rivet Actors as a first-class tool in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI), and Dynamic Apps (a V8-isolate-based runtime for deploying AI-generated applications for end users). Underneath all of this is the Actors model — a durable, stateful compute primitive built on open-source infrastructure. Durable Streams, a zero-disk SQLite storage engine with S3 tiering, and the agentOS execution API round out the technical foundation.
◆ Where it's heading
Rivet is building toward a single answer to a specific question: where does agent-generated, user-facing software actually run? The BYOC move unlocks regulated industries and large enterprises who can't send data to a SaaS control plane. MCP turns Rivet's Actors into something any AI client can discover and call without bespoke integration. Dynamic Apps makes Rivet the runtime, not just the infrastructure, for user-generated software. The through-line is that Rivet wants every AI agent — whether built by a developer or generated at runtime — to run on the Actors primitive with Rivet managing the lifecycle.
◆ Prediction
BYOC on AWS/GCP is the foundation; Azure support and SOC 2 certification are the logical next steps to close enterprise deals. Expect MCP to expand to more clients (OpenAI Codex, Copilot, Windsurf) as the MCP ecosystem grows, and Dynamic Apps to get versioning and rollback — the missing piece for user-facing production deployments.
Alternatives to Convex and Rivet
Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Convex or Rivet.
Speakeasy
Speakeasy becomes the enterprise control plane for MCP server access and AI tool governance.
Kubernetes
Kubernetes v1.37 matures its memory management and scheduling stack for AI/ML workloads.
GitHub
GitHub Copilot gets cost-aware inference tiers as enterprise AI tooling tightens across the platform.
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit pushes upmarket with enterprise APIs, rate controls, and a CLI that reviews remotely
NATS
NATS 2.15 introduces a desired-state reconciliation engine for JetStream, making cluster operations safe to run mid-flight.
See all Convex alternatives → · See all Rivet alternatives →
Recent activity from Convex and Rivet
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoRivetIntroducing Rivet BYOC ⚡
- 6d agoRivetIntroducing Rivet MCP ⚡
- 13d agoRivetDurable Streams now supports Rivet Actors
- 16d agoRivetIntroducing Dynamic Apps: Deploy AI-Generated Apps for Your Users ⚡
- 1mo agoConvexConvex raises a $57M Series B
- 1mo agoRivetRivet ships zero-disk SQLite with S3-tiered cold storage
- 1mo agoRivetIntroducing agentOS Execution API for JavaScript and Python
- 4mo agoConvexWe're organizing a conference
- 5mo agoConvexConvex's 2025 open-source contributions, recapped
- 5mo agoConvexConvex for Enterprise (and updates to everything else) ⚡
- 7mo agoConvexJust landed in Europe
- 7mo agoConvexConvex Open Source Update
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Convex and Rivet?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 8.8 vs 2.5), with 3 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Convex better than Rivet?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 8.8 vs 2.5), with 3 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Convex?
Top Convex alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Convex alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/convex for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Rivet?
Top Rivet alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rivet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rivet for the full list with editorial commentary on each.