← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

constants vs ribd

A side-by-side editorial comparison of constants and ribd — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

constants vs ribd: at a glance

Featureconstantsribd
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesphysical-constants, codata, units, uncertainty-propagationstatistical-genetics, pedigree-analysis, relatedness-coefficients, r-packages
Last editorial update14h ago48m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is constants?

The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.

constants exposes the CODATA recommended values of the physical constants to R, as a data frame plus symbol lists that carry units, uncertainties, or both. The package reached 1.0.0 on the 2018 CODATA release and has shipped once since, purely to track a units package update. Its surface is small and its release cadence is bound to CODATA, which revises every few years.

Read the full constants trajectory →

What is ribd?

The pedsuite's coefficient engine: broadening what it computes, then making the plots publishable.

ribd computes relatedness coefficients from pedigrees, covering kinship, inbreeding, kappa, condensed and detailed identity coefficients, and two-locus versions of several of these, in autosomal and X-chromosomal form. The IBD triangle is now drawable in base graphics, ggplot2 or plotly, with an optional inset pedigree, and custom relationships can be placed on it. The most recent release is dominated by correctness work, fixing pair ordering and row alignment in coefficient tables and edge cases for pedigree lists, unrelated individuals and self-pairs.

Read the full ribd trajectory →

constants vs ribd: editorial side-by-side

C
constants
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.

◆ Current state

constants exposes the CODATA recommended values of the physical constants to R, as a data frame plus symbol lists that carry units, uncertainties, or both. The package reached 1.0.0 on the 2018 CODATA release and has shipped once since, purely to track a units package update. Its surface is small and its release cadence is bound to CODATA, which revises every few years.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction set at 1.0.0 was to stop being a curated convenience wrapper and become a mechanical mirror of NIST. Hand-crafted symbol names were replaced with NIST's own ASCII symbols, categories adopted NIST's, and uncertainty switched from relative to absolute — all framed by the maintainer as necessary to make future CODATA updates routine. On top of that the package gained a correlation matrix and optional integration with the quantities package, moving it from a lookup table toward something that can propagate uncertainty.

◆ Prediction

Having rebuilt the symbol table specifically so CODATA revisions become mechanical, the next substantive release most likely tracks a new CODATA dataset rather than adding API. The experimental correlated-value support, disabled by default at 1.0.0, is the one part these entries flag as unfinished.

R
ribd
ANALYTICS
2.5

The pedsuite's coefficient engine: broadening what it computes, then making the plots publishable.

◆ Current state

ribd computes relatedness coefficients from pedigrees, covering kinship, inbreeding, kappa, condensed and detailed identity coefficients, and two-locus versions of several of these, in autosomal and X-chromosomal form. The IBD triangle is now drawable in base graphics, ggplot2 or plotly, with an optional inset pedigree, and custom relationships can be placed on it. The most recent release is dominated by correctness work, fixing pair ordering and row alignment in coefficient tables and edge cases for pedigree lists, unrelated individuals and self-pairs.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc runs from generality to presentation to precision. Early releases replaced narrow functions with general ones, most visibly when gKinship() absorbed generalisedKinship() and identityCoefs() superseded the separate autosomal and X-chromosomal identity functions in favour of an Xchrom argument. The middle stretch turned the IBD triangle into a proper plotting surface across three graphics systems. The current phase reads as consolidation, with the newest release listing six bug fixes against four features, several of them alignment errors in output tables, which is where a coefficient library most needs to be exactly right.

◆ Prediction

The two new internal functions in the latest release, inbreedingContributions() and ancestralKinship(), are the kind of thing that surfaces publicly a release or two later, so expect them to become exported decomposition tools. The correctness push through pedigree lists and edge cases suggests the near-term focus stays on hardening rather than new coefficient families.

Alternatives to constants and ribd

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either constants or ribd.

See all constants alternatives → · See all ribd alternatives →

Recent activity from constants and ribd

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 12d agoribdCustom relationships on the IBD triangle; six alignment and edge-case fixes
  2. 1y agoribdkappaIBD() can skip across-component pairs on large pedigrees
  3. 2y agoribdIBD triangle plots gain ggplot2 and plotly backends, plus inset pedigrees
  4. 3y agoribdTriangle line clipping, automatic plot margins, citation info
  5. 3y agoribdTwo-locus functions overhauled; twoLocusInbreeding and ELR added
  6. 4y agoribdIdentity coefficients unified behind identityCoefs() and an Xchrom argument
  7. 5y agoconstantsCompatibility fix for units 0.7-0
  8. 5y agoconstantsconstants 1.0.0
  9. 8y agoconstantsUnit handling fixes ahead of the 1.0.0 rebuild

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between constants and ribd?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ribd is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is constants better than ribd?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ribd is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to constants?

Top constants alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "constants alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/constants-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ribd?

Top ribd alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ribd alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ribd for the full list with editorial commentary on each.