← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

condformat vs discretefdr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of condformat and discretefdr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

condformat vs discretefdr: at a glance

Featurecondformatdiscretefdr
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, table-formatting, test-coverage, maintenance-debtmultiple-testing, false-discovery-rate, discrete-statistics, r-package
Last editorial update37m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is condformat?

A dormant table-formatting package woken by a 20-PR correctness and coverage sweep

condformat applies conditional formatting rules to R data frames and renders them to HTML, LaTeX, Excel and grob output. After 0.10.1 in 2023 it went quiet for nearly three years. Version 0.11.0 breaks that silence with a single-maintainer sweep of roughly twenty pull requests: CI modernized across R-devel, release and oldrel; lockcells fixed for LaTeX and grob output; a rule_fill_bar() crash at zero width; theme_htmlTable() no longer dropping chained arguments; and a .col pronoun added across all rules.

Read the full condformat trajectory →

What is discretefdr?

The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.

DiscreteFDR implements false discovery rate procedures adapted for discrete test statistics, where the standard continuous-case corrections are conservative. It now covers a discrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure alongside the Benjamini-Hochberg variants it started with, including adaptive versions. Its datasets and test-result classes have been moved out into companion packages, so it increasingly does one job and defers the rest.

Read the full discretefdr trajectory →

condformat vs discretefdr: editorial side-by-side

C
condformat
ANALYTICS
0.0

A dormant table-formatting package woken by a 20-PR correctness and coverage sweep

◆ Current state

condformat applies conditional formatting rules to R data frames and renders them to HTML, LaTeX, Excel and grob output. After 0.10.1 in 2023 it went quiet for nearly three years. Version 0.11.0 breaks that silence with a single-maintainer sweep of roughly twenty pull requests: CI modernized across R-devel, release and oldrel; lockcells fixed for LaTeX and grob output; a rule_fill_bar() crash at zero width; theme_htmlTable() no longer dropping chained arguments; and a .col pronoun added across all rules.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a maintenance-debt payoff rather than a change of direction. The bulk of 0.11.0 is test coverage — render_gtable, knit_print, theme_grob, render_xlsx and rule_fill_bar all gained tests — which reads as a maintainer establishing a safety net before touching anything further. The .col pronoun and scalar recycling in the text rules are the only real API additions, and both smooth inconsistencies rather than extend the rule vocabulary.

◆ Prediction

With coverage and CI now in place, the next release is more likely to extend rule or output-format support than to continue with fixes, though the three-year gap makes cadence hard to call from these entries alone.

D
discretefdr
ANALYTICS
0.0

The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.

◆ Current state

DiscreteFDR implements false discovery rate procedures adapted for discrete test statistics, where the standard continuous-case corrections are conservative. It now covers a discrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure alongside the Benjamini-Hochberg variants it started with, including adaptive versions. Its datasets and test-result classes have been moved out into companion packages, so it increasingly does one job and defers the rest.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is decomposition into a suite. The amnesia dataset went to DiscreteDatasets, summary output now interoperates with the DiscreteTestResults class from DiscreteTests, and match.pvals() stopped being exported — each release trims something that belongs elsewhere. What remains gets methodological additions at a slow, deliberate cadence, with performance work on the step-up procedures that dominate cost when the number of tests is large. Recent activity is maintenance: replacing deprecated calls the package still made of its own siblings. This is a mature statistical package whose release notes are short because the methods underneath them are settled.

◆ Prediction

Expect further alignment with the companion packages rather than new procedures, since the last substantive release was already about interoperating with DiscreteTests classes and the most recent one about clearing deprecations.

Alternatives to condformat and discretefdr

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either condformat or discretefdr.

See all condformat alternatives → · See all discretefdr alternatives →

Recent activity from condformat and discretefdr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agocondformatEnds a three-year gap with a 20-PR fix and coverage sweep
  2. 3mo agodiscretefdrDeprecated internal calls replaced
  3. 1y agodiscretefdrDiscrete Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure added
  4. 1y agodiscretefdrDatasets split out and step-up procedures sped up
  5. 2y agocondformatDocumentation fixes and internal S3 method registration
  6. 3y agocondformatcondformat2grob() gains a draw argument for composite figures
  7. 6y agocondformatDrops the lazyeval API and replaces xlsx with openxlsx
  8. 7y agocondformatAdds bar, bold and color rules plus grob rendering
  9. 8y agocondformatIntroduces the tidy-evaluation API alongside the old one

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between condformat and discretefdr?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. condformat and discretefdr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is condformat better than discretefdr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. condformat and discretefdr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to condformat?

Top condformat alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "condformat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/condformat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to discretefdr?

Top discretefdr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "discretefdr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/discretefdr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.