← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

collinear vs rempsyc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of collinear and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

collinear vs rempsyc: at a glance

Featurecollinearrempsyc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmulticollinearity, variable selection, vif, breaking changesapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2
Last editorial update7h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is collinear?

collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.

collinear removes multicollinearity from predictor sets through pairwise correlation and VIF filtering, with a preference order deciding which variable survives each conflict. Two major versions in thirteen months each rewrote the interface: 2.0.0 extended every function to any combination of categorical and numeric responses and predictors, and 3.0.0 moved to multiple responses, restructured the output into classed objects, and made both filtering thresholds adaptive by default. Version 3.0.1 is the first release since that is purely repair.

Read the full collinear trajectory →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

collinear vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side

C
collinear
ANALYTICS
0.0

collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.

◆ Current state

collinear removes multicollinearity from predictor sets through pairwise correlation and VIF filtering, with a preference order deciding which variable survives each conflict. Two major versions in thirteen months each rewrote the interface: 2.0.0 extended every function to any combination of categorical and numeric responses and predictors, and 3.0.0 moved to multiple responses, restructured the output into classed objects, and made both filtering thresholds adaptive by default. Version 3.0.1 is the first release since that is purely repair.

◆ Where it's heading

The through-line is removing decisions the user was never well placed to make. Preference-order functions were renamed twice — first onto a metric-and-model scheme in 2.0.0, then onto a response-type scheme in 3.0.0 — and f_auto() picks one when none is given; target encoding went from automatic to opt-in; max_cor and max_vif now default to NULL and trigger a data-driven threshold derived from the 75th percentile of pairwise correlations through a sigmoid and a fitted correlation-to-VIF mapping. Each change is defensible and each one broke callers, which is the cost of this approach.

◆ Prediction

3.0.1 moved the example datasets out into a separate spatialData package and fixed four crashes rather than adding anything, so the next release is most likely more consolidation on the 3.0 surface than a fourth interface.

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

Alternatives to collinear and rempsyc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either collinear or rempsyc.

See all collinear alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →

Recent activity from collinear and rempsyc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agocollinearNamespace, NA and sf fixes; example data moves to spatialData
  2. 8mo agocollinearAdaptive thresholds, multi-response support and a new output class
  3. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  4. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  5. 1y agocollinearCategorical responses, f_auto() defaults and future-based parallelism
  6. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  7. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  8. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  9. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between collinear and rempsyc?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. collinear and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is collinear better than rempsyc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. collinear and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to collinear?

Top collinear alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "collinear alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/collinear for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.