rollupTree
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
A side-by-side editorial comparison of coga and gofedf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
A gamma-convolution density package that reached completion in 2018 and has coasted since.
coga computes densities, distribution functions and random numbers for convolutions of gamma distributions, with the numerical work in C++ through Rcpp. It has been feature-complete since 1.0.0 in 2018, and every release in the seven years since has been maintenance: a documentation alias for CRAN, a compiler warning, a maintainer email change, and an Rcpp update requiring Rf_error calls to be guarded. The one functional addition in that period, in 1.1.0, was an unexported function added explicitly for research use.
A two-test goodness-of-fit package opens itself up to any weight function
gofedf runs goodness-of-fit tests built on the empirical distribution function. Its three releases trace a short, clean arc: existence in 2023, then p-values computed from an analytical solution of the integral equation in 2024, then in 2026 a user-supplied weight function that replaces the fixed menu. Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling are now two points in a family rather than the two options.
coga computes densities, distribution functions and random numbers for convolutions of gamma distributions, with the numerical work in C++ through Rcpp. It has been feature-complete since 1.0.0 in 2018, and every release in the seven years since has been maintenance: a documentation alias for CRAN, a compiler warning, a maintainer email change, and an Rcpp update requiring Rf_error calls to be guarded. The one functional addition in that period, in 1.1.0, was an unexported function added explicitly for research use.
This is a finished package being kept alive rather than developed. The releases track external pressure exactly: CRAN documentation requirements, compiler warnings, Rcpp API changes. Its maintenance is visibly shared with smam, the same maintainer's animal-movement package, which received the same email update, the same format-security fix and the same Rcpp guard within a minute or twenty of coga each time. Neither package is being extended; both are being kept installable.
Expect nothing but CRAN and toolchain maintenance, arriving whenever Rcpp or R's check requirements change, and arriving alongside smam. There is no signal in these entries of planned functional work.
gofedf runs goodness-of-fit tests built on the empirical distribution function. Its three releases trace a short, clean arc: existence in 2023, then p-values computed from an analytical solution of the integral equation in 2024, then in 2026 a user-supplied weight function that replaces the fixed menu. Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling are now two points in a family rather than the two options.
The package is generalising rather than accumulating. Each release removed a hard-coded decision: first how eigenvalues are computed, offering both the analytical route and a matrix approximation; then which weight function defines the statistic at all. The maintainer's own framing in 1.1.0 is a contrast against what earlier versions would not let you do, which is the shape of a package aiming to become a framework.
An arbitrary weight function is the extensibility point that matters for EDF tests; what it lacks is calibration guidance, since Type I error behaviour was the argued benefit of the analytical eigenvalue route. Documented recommendations or diagnostics for user-chosen weights are the natural follow-up, though the entries do not announce one.
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either coga or gofedf.
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. coga and gofedf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. coga and gofedf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
Top coga alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "coga alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/coga for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top gofedf alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gofedf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gofedf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.