← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

cofad vs tectonicr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cofad and tectonicr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

cofad vs tectonicr: at a glance

Featurecofadtectonicr
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescontrast-analysis, factorial-designs, shiny, psychology-methodsgeophysics, stress-field, circular-statistics, plate-tectonics
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cofad?

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

Read the full cofad trajectory →

What is tectonicr?

Stress-field analysis tracks the 2025 World Stress Map and keeps adding plotting shortcuts.

tectonicr analyses the orientation of maximum horizontal stress, comparing observed azimuths against those predicted by plate motion in a plate-of-rotation reference frame. Version 0.4.7 added support for the 2025 World Stress Map release and made the version selectable at download; 0.4.8 followed with new summary statistics for axial data, ggplot2 geoms for plotting directions, and a faster kappa estimator.

Read the full tectonicr trajectory →

cofad vs tectonicr: editorial side-by-side

C
cofad
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

◆ Current state

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and correctness-led. The record runs from a JOSS publication in 2021 through a near three-year gap to a release that both extended the method and repaired the GUI, then a degrees-of-freedom fix. Maintainer and author order changed in 0.3.0, which typically marks a handover rather than a burst of new work, and the cadence since is consistent with that.

◆ Prediction

Expect low-frequency correctness releases; the competing contrast analysis helper added in 0.3.0 is the most likely thing to be extended if anything is.

T
tectonicr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Stress-field analysis tracks the 2025 World Stress Map and keeps adding plotting shortcuts.

◆ Current state

tectonicr analyses the orientation of maximum horizontal stress, comparing observed azimuths against those predicted by plate motion in a plate-of-rotation reference frame. Version 0.4.7 added support for the 2025 World Stress Map release and made the version selectable at download; 0.4.8 followed with new summary statistics for axial data, ggplot2 geoms for plotting directions, and a faster kappa estimator.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is maturing along two axes at once. On the statistics side the circular methods keep getting corrected and accelerated, with a major fix to est.kappa() for doubling angles before treating them as directional data and a faster approximation replacing the maximum likelihood path by default. On the usability side the additions are convenience wrappers, data2PoR() and the geom_azimuth pair, which is what a package does once its core methods stop moving. A sign convention for deviation was also flipped, which quietly changes existing results.

◆ Prediction

Expect the convenience layer to keep growing around a stable core, and the next substantive release to track whatever the World Stress Map publishes after 2025.

Alternatives to cofad and tectonicr

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cofad or tectonicr.

See all cofad alternatives → · See all tectonicr alternatives →

Recent activity from cofad and tectonicr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 8mo agotectonicrggplot2 azimuth geoms and axial summary statistics added
  2. 1y agotectonicrWorld Stress Map 2025 supported with selectable version
  3. 1y agocofadDegrees of freedom corrected in the t-test table
  4. 1y agotectonicrSpatial interpolation performance improved
  5. 2y agocofadCompeting contrast helper, rebuilt Shiny GUI, maintainer change
  6. 2y agotectonicrWeighting powers added to spatial interpolation
  7. 2y agotectonicrBootstrap dispersion statistics ahead of CRAN submission
  8. 4y agocofadDocumentation and references for JOSS publication
  9. 4y agocofadShiny GUI added; aggregated-data function and 0-variance fix

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cofad and tectonicr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cofad and tectonicr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cofad better than tectonicr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cofad and tectonicr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cofad?

Top cofad alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cofad alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cofad for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tectonicr?

Top tectonicr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tectonicr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tectonicr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.