← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

cofad vs forestTIME

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cofad and forestTIME — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

cofad vs forestTIME: at a glance

FeaturecofadforestTIME
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescontrast-analysis, factorial-designs, shiny, psychology-methodsforest-inventory, carbon-estimation, fia-data, interpolation
Last editorial update59m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cofad?

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

Read the full cofad trajectory →

What is forestTIME?

A forest-inventory pipeline grew the strata machinery it needs to make population estimates.

forestTIME turns US Forest Inventory and Analysis data into annualized carbon and biomass estimates by interpolating between the years each plot is actually measured. Version 2.2.0 adds fia_assign_strata(), which matches every plot-year to an EVALID, estimation unit and stratum along with the values needed for population-level estimation with variance. The composite ID scheme also changed order, which breaks joins written against the old one.

Read the full forestTIME trajectory →

cofad vs forestTIME: editorial side-by-side

C
cofad
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

◆ Current state

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and correctness-led. The record runs from a JOSS publication in 2021 through a near three-year gap to a release that both extended the method and repaired the GUI, then a degrees-of-freedom fix. Maintainer and author order changed in 0.3.0, which typically marks a handover rather than a burst of new work, and the cadence since is consistent with that.

◆ Prediction

Expect low-frequency correctness releases; the competing contrast analysis helper added in 0.3.0 is the most likely thing to be extended if anything is.

F
forestTIME
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A forest-inventory pipeline grew the strata machinery it needs to make population estimates.

◆ Current state

forestTIME turns US Forest Inventory and Analysis data into annualized carbon and biomass estimates by interpolating between the years each plot is actually measured. Version 2.2.0 adds fia_assign_strata(), which matches every plot-year to an EVALID, estimation unit and stratum along with the values needed for population-level estimation with variance. The composite ID scheme also changed order, which breaks joins written against the old one.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc runs from a duckDB-backed script to a package with a design-based estimation story. First the database layer was removed in favour of a single interpolated table; then the function surface was consolidated behind fia_ names and fia_annualize(); then expansion factors appeared; now the stratification the FIA estimators actually require. Each step moves closer to producing estimates users can put an error bar on rather than interpolated numbers.

◆ Prediction

The notes name a temporary workaround for woodland species, whose carbon and biomass code is missing, and say fia_estimate() will eventually handle them directly. That, plus variance calculation built on the new strata columns, is the visible next work.

Alternatives to cofad and forestTIME

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cofad or forestTIME.

See all cofad alternatives → · See all forestTIME alternatives →

Recent activity from cofad and forestTIME

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agoforestTIMEStrata assignment opens the door to population-level estimates
  2. 11mo agoforestTIMERenamed from forestTIME.builder, adds expansion factors
  3. 1y agoforestTIMEFunction surface consolidated behind fia_ names
  4. 1y agoforestTIMEInterpolation stops producing impossible trees
  5. 1y agocofadDegrees of freedom corrected in the t-test table
  6. 1y agoforestTIMEduckDB dropped for a single interpolated table
  7. 1y agoforestTIMESnapshot before carbon estimation existed
  8. 2y agocofadCompeting contrast helper, rebuilt Shiny GUI, maintainer change
  9. 4y agocofadDocumentation and references for JOSS publication
  10. 4y agocofadShiny GUI added; aggregated-data function and 0-variance fix

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cofad and forestTIME?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cofad and forestTIME are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cofad better than forestTIME?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cofad and forestTIME are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cofad?

Top cofad alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cofad alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cofad for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to forestTIME?

Top forestTIME alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forestTIME alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/foresttime for the full list with editorial commentary on each.