← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

clinify vs OneSampleMR

A side-by-side editorial comparison of clinify and OneSampleMR — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

clinify vs OneSampleMR: at a glance

FeatureclinifyOneSampleMR
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesclinical-trials, r-package, document-generation, table-formattingmendelian randomization, r, instrumental variables, epidemiology
Last editorial update3h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is clinify?

Clinical-table typesetting for R, closing the gap between R output and regulatory Word documents

clinify renders clinical trial tables into Word documents through {officer}, aiming at the layout conventions regulatory submissions expect. 0.4.0 is the current CRAN release and folds in an unreleased 0.3.1. The recent work is almost entirely about header and spacing control: which adjacent header cells merge, where the rule under a spanner starts and stops, and how much vertical space sits above, below and between header rows and the table body.

Read the full clinify trajectory →

What is OneSampleMR?

OneSampleMR found that argument order in a formula was silently changing its estimates

OneSampleMR implements one-sample Mendelian randomization estimators — two-stage predictor substitution, two-stage residual inclusion, and Sanderson-Windmeijer conditional F statistics for instrument strength. The package spent its first years on packaging and dependency upkeep. The 2026 releases turn to substance: broader support for models fitted elsewhere, then a correctness fix for a defect that depended on nothing more than where covariates appeared in a formula.

Read the full OneSampleMR trajectory →

clinify vs OneSampleMR: editorial side-by-side

C
clinify
ANALYTICS
2.5

Clinical-table typesetting for R, closing the gap between R output and regulatory Word documents

◆ Current state

clinify renders clinical trial tables into Word documents through {officer}, aiming at the layout conventions regulatory submissions expect. 0.4.0 is the current CRAN release and folds in an unreleased 0.3.1. The recent work is almost entirely about header and spacing control: which adjacent header cells merge, where the rule under a spanner starts and stops, and how much vertical space sits above, below and between header rows and the table body.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from producing a correct table toward producing one that survives an organisation's house style. 0.4.0's additions are all written to hold under a customised `clinify_table_default()` — `clin_spanner_rule()` draws after the default styling function so it persists when a house style clears the borders it started from, and takes an `officer::fp_border()` or `FALSE` so a style can decline the rule entirely. The earlier 0.3.0 line did the structural work, introducing `clindoc()` document objects that accept multiple tables plus automatic pagination.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued refinement of layout primitives that follow the table rather than fixed column numbers, since both new 0.4.0 functions were built specifically to track spanners and headers as a layout changes. The entries do not indicate a move beyond Word output.

O
OneSampleMR
ANALYTICS
0.0

OneSampleMR found that argument order in a formula was silently changing its estimates

◆ Current state

OneSampleMR implements one-sample Mendelian randomization estimators — two-stage predictor substitution, two-stage residual inclusion, and Sanderson-Windmeijer conditional F statistics for instrument strength. The package spent its first years on packaging and dependency upkeep. The 2026 releases turn to substance: broader support for models fitted elsewhere, then a correctness fix for a defect that depended on nothing more than where covariates appeared in a formula.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads. The first is reach — fsw() now reads models fitted by AER::ivreg(), estimatr::iv_robust() and fixest::feols() in addition to ivreg::ivreg(), which makes conditional F statistics available without refitting in the package's own idiom. The second is hardening: clear errors when more than one exposure is given or when a variable collides with the reserved name y, and print methods that no longer fail on user-specified t0 with log or logit links. Both come largely from user reports rather than a plan.

◆ Prediction

The estimator-support work has been adding one IV-fitting package at a time on outside contributions, so further backends are the likeliest next content — the package's own estimators have been stable since first release.

Alternatives to clinify and OneSampleMR

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either clinify or OneSampleMR.

See all clinify alternatives → · See all OneSampleMR alternatives →

Recent activity from clinify and OneSampleMR

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 13d agoclinifyFiner header merging, spanner rules and header padding
  2. 1mo agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR fixes estimates broken by covariate order in the formula
  3. 5mo agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR computes conditional F for three more IV packages
  4. 1y agoclinifyclindoc document objects and automatic pagination
  5. 1y agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR 0.1.6
  6. 2y agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR 0.1.5
  7. 2y agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR 0.1.4
  8. 3y agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR 0.1.3

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between clinify and OneSampleMR?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. clinify is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is clinify better than OneSampleMR?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. clinify is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to clinify?

Top clinify alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "clinify alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/clinify-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to OneSampleMR?

Top OneSampleMR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OneSampleMR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/onesamplemr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.