rollupTree
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
Comparison · Infra & APIs
checkhelper vs lares
A side-by-side editorial comparison of checkhelper and lares — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
checkhelper vs lares: at a glance
What is checkhelper?
checkhelper grew from a check wrapper into a CRAN pre-submission auditor.
1.0.0 added a whole audit_* family — audit_downloads(), audit_description(), audit_dontrun() and audit_citation() — each parsing package source statically and returning a tibble of hits paired with a suggested fix. The package is now defending that position: 1.0.1 rc1 is a submission candidate answering a CRAN archival notice, after roxygen2 8.x moved DESCRIPTION's RoxygenNote field and broke a find_missing_tags() test fixture.
What is lares?
One analyst's toolbox, still shipping: Meta MMM tooling beside Wordle solvers
lares is Bernardo Lares' personal R sidekick and has never pretended otherwise — the same release adds a marketing-mix diagnostic and a function to keep your screen awake. The serious core is the Robyn/Meta arm: model selection, per-channel performance decomposition, cross-channel budget allocation. Around it sit h2o AutoML wrappers, credential and cache helpers, MP3 tagging, and a family of games.
checkhelper vs lares: editorial side-by-side
checkhelper
2.5INFRA · APIS
checkhelper grew from a check wrapper into a CRAN pre-submission auditor.
◆ Current state
1.0.0 added a whole audit_* family — audit_downloads(), audit_description(), audit_dontrun() and audit_citation() — each parsing package source statically and returning a tibble of hits paired with a suggested fix. The package is now defending that position: 1.0.1 rc1 is a submission candidate answering a CRAN archival notice, after roxygen2 8.x moved DESCRIPTION's RoxygenNote field and broke a find_missing_tags() test fixture.
◆ Where it's heading
The design commitment is static analysis — AST walks via getParseData(), line-by-line Rd reading, no eval() and no namespace loading — so the tool can report on a package it never runs. That commitment is what made the roxygen2 8.x break survivable: the audit pipeline itself was verified correct under 8.1.0 and only the test scaffolding had to go, now guarded by a dedicated regression test. fix_globals(write = TRUE) is being sanded down in parallel, no longer flattening per-function grouping comments or writing a degenerate empty globalVariables() shell.
◆ Prediction
The immediate move is the 1.0.1 submission itself, clearing the archival notice. Beyond that, each additional CRAN incoming-check rule remains a candidate for another audit_* function; the open question these notes still leave is whether the family ever gets a single combined entry point.
lares
0.0INFRA · APIS
One analyst's toolbox, still shipping: Meta MMM tooling beside Wordle solvers
◆ Current state
lares is Bernardo Lares' personal R sidekick and has never pretended otherwise — the same release adds a marketing-mix diagnostic and a function to keep your screen awake. The serious core is the Robyn/Meta arm: model selection, per-channel performance decomposition, cross-channel budget allocation. Around it sit h2o AutoML wrappers, credential and cache helpers, MP3 tagging, and a family of games.
◆ Where it's heading
Over two years the Robyn tooling matured first — robyn_performance() and robyn_modelselector() were rebuilt release after release through 2024 — and recent work has drifted outward into media and API plumbing: encrypted file helpers in 5.3.2, then an iTunes-first metadata path, MP3 tag writing, and a move of holidays() onto the Nager.Date API in 5.4.0. Cadence is roughly quarterly and the package has been quiet for three months.
◆ Prediction
The pattern in nearly every release is that a third-party API moves and lares follows it — Meta's version bumps, Robyn 3.12.0, now Nager.Date. Expect the next release to be another compatibility pass plus whatever utility the author needed that week; nothing in these entries points at a structural change.
Alternatives to checkhelper and lares
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either checkhelper or lares.
massProps
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
writeAlizer
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
samplr
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
stochvol
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
midr
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
See all checkhelper alternatives → · See all lares alternatives →
Recent activity from checkhelper and lares
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agocheckhelpercheckhelper 1.0.1 rc1 (CRAN submission candidate)
- 3mo agocheckhelperA static audit_* family for CRAN pre-submission checks ⚡
- 3mo agolaresNager.Date holidays, MP3 tag writing, named h2o models
- 11mo agolaresEncrypted file helpers join the credential tooling
- 1y agolaresggplot2 4.0 readiness and Meta API v21
- 1y agolaresMarginal CPA inverted and multi-model performance fixed
- 1y agolaresCertainty and cluster-spread metrics for model selection
- 1y agolaresCross-channel budget allocation across several models
- 2y agocheckhelperTest fixes for roxygen2 changes
- 3y agocheckhelpercheckhelper 0.1.0 - First CRAN Release
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between checkhelper and lares?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. checkhelper is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is checkhelper better than lares?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. checkhelper is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to checkhelper?
Top checkhelper alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "checkhelper alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/checkhelper for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to lares?
Top lares alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lares alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lares for the full list with editorial commentary on each.