mice
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of lares and samplr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
One analyst's toolbox, still shipping: Meta MMM tooling beside Wordle solvers
lares is Bernardo Lares' personal R sidekick and has never pretended otherwise — the same release adds a marketing-mix diagnostic and a function to keep your screen awake. The serious core is the Robyn/Meta arm: model selection, per-channel performance decomposition, cross-channel budget allocation. Around it sit h2o AutoML wrappers, credential and cache helpers, MP3 tagging, and a family of games.
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
samplr compares human performance against sampling algorithms, giving cognitive scientists the MCMC machinery to test whether people behave like samplers. Its entire public history is three releases: a 1.0.0 in August 2024, a floating-point fix eighteen seconds later, and then nothing until a February 2026 patch. The release notes are unusually thin even by CRAN standards.
lares is Bernardo Lares' personal R sidekick and has never pretended otherwise — the same release adds a marketing-mix diagnostic and a function to keep your screen awake. The serious core is the Robyn/Meta arm: model selection, per-channel performance decomposition, cross-channel budget allocation. Around it sit h2o AutoML wrappers, credential and cache helpers, MP3 tagging, and a family of games.
Over two years the Robyn tooling matured first — robyn_performance() and robyn_modelselector() were rebuilt release after release through 2024 — and recent work has drifted outward into media and API plumbing: encrypted file helpers in 5.3.2, then an iTunes-first metadata path, MP3 tag writing, and a move of holidays() onto the Nager.Date API in 5.4.0. Cadence is roughly quarterly and the package has been quiet for three months.
The pattern in nearly every release is that a third-party API moves and lares follows it — Meta's version bumps, Robyn 3.12.0, now Nager.Date. Expect the next release to be another compatibility pass plus whatever utility the author needed that week; nothing in these entries points at a structural change.
samplr compares human performance against sampling algorithms, giving cognitive scientists the MCMC machinery to test whether people behave like samplers. Its entire public history is three releases: a 1.0.0 in August 2024, a floating-point fix eighteen seconds later, and then nothing until a February 2026 patch. The release notes are unusually thin even by CRAN standards.
The feed shows a package that shipped and stopped. The 2024 tags were both created in one sitting and say almost nothing; the 2026 release is a row-count bug in Mean_Variance() bundled with citation metadata, a dropped dependency and http-to-https link fixes — the housekeeping profile of a package being kept alive for the paper that cites it rather than actively developed.
Adding citation information to the README is usually the move of a maintainer expecting the package to be referenced rather than extended. On this cadence the next release is more likely another CRAN-hygiene patch than new algorithms; there is not enough in these notes to say otherwise.
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either lares or samplr.
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
A market-microstructure toolkit that keeps adding estimators as the papers land.
A vowel-analysis package trimming dependencies after an email address got it archived.
The R half of the EMU speech database system, fixing what was quietly broken.
A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.
tidyplots keeps rebuilding its own foundations rather than layering around them.
See all lares alternatives → · See all samplr alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. lares and samplr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lares and samplr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
Top lares alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lares alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lares for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top samplr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "samplr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/samplr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.