pins
pins keeps adding a storage backend per release while retiring its original API
Comparison · Analytics
censored vs Countly
A side-by-side editorial comparison of censored and Countly — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
censored vs Countly: at a glance
What is censored?
censored keeps survival models aligned with parsnip's shifting prediction contracts
censored supplies survival-analysis engines to parsnip, and its release history is dominated by staying in step with the rest of tidymodels rather than shipping independent features. The 0.2.0 and 0.3.0 releases added engines and prediction types; everything since has been contract alignment — quantile prediction format, hardhat test adaptation, flexsurv preparation.
What is Countly?
Countly's LTS line is spending its releases on hardening the surfaces customers extend.
The 25.03 LTS and 24.05 branches are moving together, and the recent content is dominated by security and scoping work rather than features. The latest LTS rebuilds the api and frontend Docker images as multi-stage builds on Debian 13 with Node 24 so compilers and build tooling no longer ship, overrides fourteen vulnerable transitive dependencies, and replaces the unmaintained v8-sandbox behind custom code with isolated-vm. Earlier releases scoped internal event hooks to their own apps, fixed the consents table returning fields beyond the consent columns, and stopped dashboard widgets being copied by users without access to the referenced apps.
censored vs Countly: editorial side-by-side
censored
0.0ANALYTICS
censored keeps survival models aligned with parsnip's shifting prediction contracts
◆ Current state
censored supplies survival-analysis engines to parsnip, and its release history is dominated by staying in step with the rest of tidymodels rather than shipping independent features. The 0.2.0 and 0.3.0 releases added engines and prediction types; everything since has been contract alignment — quantile prediction format, hardhat test adaptation, flexsurv preparation.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is settling into a downstream role where parsnip and hardhat set the interface and censored implements it for censored regression. Breaking changes arrive from upstream, not from new ideas here. The substantive engine work — aorsf, flexsurvspline, glmnet multi_predict — is behind it, and recent cycles are thin.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next releases to track further parsnip prediction-type changes rather than add engines; the entries do not show new survival methods in progress.
Countly
5.0ANALYTICS
Countly's LTS line is spending its releases on hardening the surfaces customers extend.
◆ Current state
The 25.03 LTS and 24.05 branches are moving together, and the recent content is dominated by security and scoping work rather than features. The latest LTS rebuilds the api and frontend Docker images as multi-stage builds on Debian 13 with Node 24 so compilers and build tooling no longer ship, overrides fourteen vulnerable transitive dependencies, and replaces the unmaintained v8-sandbox behind custom code with isolated-vm. Earlier releases scoped internal event hooks to their own apps, fixed the consents table returning fields beyond the consent columns, and stopped dashboard widgets being copied by users without access to the referenced apps.
◆ Where it's heading
The pattern across these releases is closing the gaps where a customer-supplied artefact — custom hook code, a copied widget, a projection on a request — could reach further than intended. That work is now touching the runtime itself, and the isolated-vm swap is a breaking change: custom code relying on setTimeout, setInterval or async completion fails with a logged error instead of running. The journey engine is the only place shipping genuinely new capability, and it is enterprise-only.
◆ Prediction
Expect follow-up releases to soften the custom-code migration, since the isolated-vm switch silently breaks any hook that awaited a timer, and further ab-testing work now that pystan has been replaced with compiled Stan executables.
Alternatives to censored and Countly
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either censored or Countly.
tsibble
tsibble shipped one release in five and a half years - the data structure is finished
yardstick
yardstick made fairness metrics a first-class part of tidymodels evaluation
tune
tune extends tuning past the model itself to postprocessors, and adds a second parallel backend
leaflet
leaflet relicensed to MIT and finished migrating off R's retired spatial stack
ggpubr
ggpubr reached 1.0.0 with p-value formatting presets for specific journals
See all censored alternatives → · See all Countly alternatives →
Recent activity from censored and Countly
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoCountlyCustom-code sandbox swapped to isolated-vm; images rebuilt on Node 24
- 9d agoCountlyFixes for event keys containing special characters
- 9d agoCountlyJourney deeplinks take dynamic parameters; hooks validated on save
- 20d agoCountlyStar-rating logo path and data-manager transformation fixes
- 21d agoCountlyLTS backport: data-manager transformation fix
- 1mo agoCountlyJourneys survive user merges; SDK-provided asset paths
- 4mo agocensoredcensored 0.3.4
- 1y agocensoredQuantile prediction format follows new parsnip requirements
- 2y agocensoredSurvival probabilities at infinite evaluation times now computed
- 2y agocensoredcensored 0.3.1
- 2y agocensoredmulti_predict() for all glmnet prediction types; aorsf predicts time
- 3y agocensoredeval_time replaces time; matrix fitting for censored regression
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between censored and Countly?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Countly is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is censored better than Countly?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Countly is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to censored?
Top censored alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "censored alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/censored for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Countly?
Top Countly alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Countly alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/countly for the full list with editorial commentary on each.