← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

cbcTools vs cofad

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cbcTools and cofad — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

cbcTools vs cofad: at a glance

FeaturecbcToolscofad
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesconjoint-analysis, experimental-design, choice-modeling, performancecontrast-analysis, factorial-designs, shiny, psychology-methods
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cbcTools?

Two years quiet, then a release that makes its greedy design methods practical

cbcTools generates and evaluates designs for choice-based conjoint experiments, gathering several strategies behind one method argument in cbc_design(): random, orthogonal via DoE.base, D-optimal, Bayesian D-efficient and greedy. That structure was set during 2023 across 0.4.0 and 0.5.0, which introduced the method argument, added strategies and documented in a table which options each one supports. The only release since, in August 2025, removes efficiency limitations from the greedy methods.

Read the full cbcTools trajectory →

What is cofad?

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

Read the full cofad trajectory →

cbcTools vs cofad: editorial side-by-side

C
cbcTools
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Two years quiet, then a release that makes its greedy design methods practical

◆ Current state

cbcTools generates and evaluates designs for choice-based conjoint experiments, gathering several strategies behind one method argument in cbc_design(): random, orthogonal via DoE.base, D-optimal, Bayesian D-efficient and greedy. That structure was set during 2023 across 0.4.0 and 0.5.0, which introduced the method argument, added strategies and documented in a table which options each one supports. The only release since, in August 2025, removes efficiency limitations from the greedy methods.

◆ Where it's heading

The package was explicitly built for extension — the 0.4.0 notes say the function is now better set up to add methods in future — and the pattern since has been adding or repairing one method at a time behind a stable interface. After a two-year gap the recent work is performance rather than coverage, which suggests the greedy methods were slow enough to be impractical at realistic design sizes. Restrictions have been added deliberately too, such as blocking the label argument for orthogonal designs because it would destroy orthogonality.

◆ Prediction

On the extension pattern the maintainer set up, the next release most likely adds another design method or continues tuning existing ones for speed; the entries do not indicate which.

C
cofad
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

◆ Current state

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and correctness-led. The record runs from a JOSS publication in 2021 through a near three-year gap to a release that both extended the method and repaired the GUI, then a degrees-of-freedom fix. Maintainer and author order changed in 0.3.0, which typically marks a handover rather than a burst of new work, and the cadence since is consistent with that.

◆ Prediction

Expect low-frequency correctness releases; the competing contrast analysis helper added in 0.3.0 is the most likely thing to be extended if anything is.

Alternatives to cbcTools and cofad

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cbcTools or cofad.

See all cbcTools alternatives → · See all cofad alternatives →

Recent activity from cbcTools and cofad

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11mo agocbcToolsImprovements to greedy methods
  2. 1y agocofadDegrees of freedom corrected in the t-test table
  3. 2y agocofadCompeting contrast helper, rebuilt Shiny GUI, maintainer change
  4. 3y agocbcToolsrandom and dopt design methods; orthogonality restrictions enforced
  5. 3y agocbcToolsmethod argument reworked; orthogonal designs via DoE.base
  6. 3y agocbcToolsBayesian D-efficient designs with restricted profile sets
  7. 3y agocbcToolsFirst CRAN release
  8. 4y agocofadDocumentation and references for JOSS publication
  9. 4y agocofadShiny GUI added; aggregated-data function and 0-variance fix

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cbcTools and cofad?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cbcTools and cofad are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cbcTools better than cofad?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cbcTools and cofad are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cbcTools?

Top cbcTools alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cbcTools alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cbctools for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to cofad?

Top cofad alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cofad alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cofad for the full list with editorial commentary on each.