← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

c3dr vs ymlthis

A side-by-side editorial comparison of c3dr and ymlthis — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

c3dr vs ymlthis: at a glance

Featurec3drymlthis
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbiomechanics, motion-capture, ropensci, r-packager-markdown, yaml, retirement, quarto
Last editorial update4h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is c3dr?

A biomechanics C3D reader graduated through rOpenSci review to CRAN, then learned to write force plates.

c3dr reads and writes C3D motion-capture files in R, wrapping the EZC3D library. It cleared rOpenSci peer review and moved into the rOpenSci organisation in April 2025, reached CRAN a month later, and shipped force-platform export in c3d_write() in August. Releases are close together and each one has a clear single purpose.

Read the full c3dr trajectory →

What is ymlthis?

ymlthis retired itself, naming Quarto as the reason it no longer needs to exist.

ymlthis built R Markdown YAML front matter programmatically — a fluent `yml_*()` interface plus RStudio add-ins, so users did not have to hand-write metadata blocks whose valid fields were scattered across output-format documentation. Version 1.0.0 declares the package retired, with only CRAN-preserving changes to follow, and states the reason plainly: Quarto now provides good YAML support.

Read the full ymlthis trajectory →

c3dr vs ymlthis: editorial side-by-side

C
c3dr
ANALYTICS
0.0

A biomechanics C3D reader graduated through rOpenSci review to CRAN, then learned to write force plates.

◆ Current state

c3dr reads and writes C3D motion-capture files in R, wrapping the EZC3D library. It cleared rOpenSci peer review and moved into the rOpenSci organisation in April 2025, reached CRAN a month later, and shipped force-platform export in c3d_write() in August. Releases are close together and each one has a clear single purpose.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is filling in the write side of the read/write pair. Reading was in place from the start; 0.2.0 extends c3d_write() to force-platform data on a direct user request, and the accompanying work preserves matrix structure on import and tracks upstream EZC3D changes. The review-era releases hardened validation and error messages, so the current cycle can be spent on capability rather than polish.

◆ Prediction

Expect further coverage of C3D block types in the writer and continued tracking of EZC3D releases; the changelog gives no signal of analysis features beyond file I/O.

Y
ymlthis
ANALYTICS
0.0

ymlthis retired itself, naming Quarto as the reason it no longer needs to exist.

◆ Current state

ymlthis built R Markdown YAML front matter programmatically — a fluent `yml_*()` interface plus RStudio add-ins, so users did not have to hand-write metadata blocks whose valid fields were scattered across output-format documentation. Version 1.0.0 declares the package retired, with only CRAN-preserving changes to follow, and states the reason plainly: Quarto now provides good YAML support.

◆ Where it's heading

The retirement is the endpoint of a long drift. Between 2020 and 2022 every release was reactive — patching around a crayon update that mangled rendered YAML, tracking shiny 1.6, following roxygen2 7.0.0, fixing a typo in an add-in. No new capability has landed in six years, and the four-year gap before 1.0.0 had already answered the question the release note finally makes explicit.

◆ Prediction

Nothing further of substance is expected — the stated policy is changes only where CRAN requires them, so the next release, if any, will be a compatibility patch.

Alternatives to c3dr and ymlthis

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either c3dr or ymlthis.

See all c3dr alternatives → · See all ymlthis alternatives →

Recent activity from c3dr and ymlthis

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5mo agoymlthisymlthis retired; Quarto covers the need
  2. 11mo agoc3drc3d_write() gains force platform export
  3. 1y agoc3drgcc 15 compilation fix
  4. 1y agoc3drFirst CRAN release
  5. 1y agoc3drrOpenSci review lands; repo moves to rOpenSci
  6. 4y agoymlthisTypo fixed in the miniUI add-in check
  7. 4y agoymlthisyml_author() accepts yml_blank(); shiny fixes
  8. 4y agoymlthisciteproc handling moved to newer rmarkdown functions
  9. 5y agoymlthisPatched a crayon update that mangled rendered YAML
  10. 5y agoymlthisAdjustments for shiny 1.6

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between c3dr and ymlthis?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. c3dr and ymlthis are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is c3dr better than ymlthis?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. c3dr and ymlthis are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to c3dr?

Top c3dr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "c3dr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/c3dr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ymlthis?

Top ymlthis alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ymlthis alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ymlthis for the full list with editorial commentary on each.