tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of c3dr and dendroNetwork — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
A biomechanics C3D reader graduated through rOpenSci review to CRAN, then learned to write force plates.
c3dr reads and writes C3D motion-capture files in R, wrapping the EZC3D library. It cleared rOpenSci peer review and moved into the rOpenSci organisation in April 2025, reached CRAN a month later, and shipped force-platform export in c3d_write() in August. Releases are close together and each one has a clear single purpose.
Six releases, six identical bodies — the feed carries the package abstract instead of release notes
dendroNetwork builds networks of dendrochronological series from similarity between tree-ring measurements, applies community detection to find matching material, and hands the result to Cytoscape for visualisation. That description is all the feed provides: every one of the six visible releases carries the same package abstract as its body, with no record of what changed in any of them. Version 0.5.5 in July 2025 is the most recent.
c3dr reads and writes C3D motion-capture files in R, wrapping the EZC3D library. It cleared rOpenSci peer review and moved into the rOpenSci organisation in April 2025, reached CRAN a month later, and shipped force-platform export in c3d_write() in August. Releases are close together and each one has a clear single purpose.
The package is filling in the write side of the read/write pair. Reading was in place from the start; 0.2.0 extends c3d_write() to force-platform data on a direct user request, and the accompanying work preserves matrix structure on import and tracks upstream EZC3D changes. The review-era releases hardened validation and error messages, so the current cycle can be spent on capability rather than polish.
Expect further coverage of C3D block types in the writer and continued tracking of EZC3D releases; the changelog gives no signal of analysis features beyond file I/O.
dendroNetwork builds networks of dendrochronological series from similarity between tree-ring measurements, applies community detection to find matching material, and hands the result to Cytoscape for visualisation. That description is all the feed provides: every one of the six visible releases carries the same package abstract as its body, with no record of what changed in any of them. Version 0.5.5 in July 2025 is the most recent.
What the timestamps show is more informative than the text. Versions 0.5.0 through 0.5.3 were all published within two minutes of each other on 12 April 2024, and in descending version order, which is the signature of a release history backfilled in one pass rather than four separate releases. Real releases follow at 0.5.4 a fortnight later and 0.5.5 fifteen months after that. Development is slow and, on this evidence, undocumented.
No prediction is supportable from these entries — none of them describe a change. Any read on where this package is heading would need the NEWS file or the commit history rather than the feed.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either c3dr or dendroNetwork.
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all c3dr alternatives → · See all dendroNetwork alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. c3dr and dendroNetwork are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. c3dr and dendroNetwork are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top c3dr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "c3dr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/c3dr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top dendroNetwork alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "dendroNetwork alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dendronetwork for the full list with editorial commentary on each.