← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

c3dr vs sftime

A side-by-side editorial comparison of c3dr and sftime — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

c3dr vs sftime: at a glance

Featurec3drsftime
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbiomechanics, motion-capture, ropensci, r-packagespatiotemporal, r-spatial, interoperability, tidyverse-integration
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is c3dr?

A biomechanics C3D reader graduated through rOpenSci review to CRAN, then learned to write force plates.

c3dr reads and writes C3D motion-capture files in R, wrapping the EZC3D library. It cleared rOpenSci peer review and moved into the rOpenSci organisation in April 2025, reached CRAN a month later, and shipped force-platform export in c3d_write() in August. Releases are close together and each one has a clear single purpose.

Read the full c3dr trajectory →

What is sftime?

The spatiotemporal companion to sf, moving at the pace of the packages around it.

sftime extends sf with an active time column, giving R a data frame class for data that is both spatial and temporal. Its recent history is almost entirely integration work: 0.3.0 added conversion methods from spatstat point patterns, sftrack and sftraj movement objects and cubble data frames, plus dedicated tidyr::drop_na() and dplyr::dplyr_reconstruct() methods. The two releases since are a namespace version-check correction and a switch from the magrittr pipe to the native pipe in examples.

Read the full sftime trajectory →

c3dr vs sftime: editorial side-by-side

C
c3dr
ANALYTICS
0.0

A biomechanics C3D reader graduated through rOpenSci review to CRAN, then learned to write force plates.

◆ Current state

c3dr reads and writes C3D motion-capture files in R, wrapping the EZC3D library. It cleared rOpenSci peer review and moved into the rOpenSci organisation in April 2025, reached CRAN a month later, and shipped force-platform export in c3d_write() in August. Releases are close together and each one has a clear single purpose.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is filling in the write side of the read/write pair. Reading was in place from the start; 0.2.0 extends c3d_write() to force-platform data on a direct user request, and the accompanying work preserves matrix structure on import and tracks upstream EZC3D changes. The review-era releases hardened validation and error messages, so the current cycle can be spent on capability rather than polish.

◆ Prediction

Expect further coverage of C3D block types in the writer and continued tracking of EZC3D releases; the changelog gives no signal of analysis features beyond file I/O.

S
sftime
ANALYTICS
0.0

The spatiotemporal companion to sf, moving at the pace of the packages around it.

◆ Current state

sftime extends sf with an active time column, giving R a data frame class for data that is both spatial and temporal. Its recent history is almost entirely integration work: 0.3.0 added conversion methods from spatstat point patterns, sftrack and sftraj movement objects and cubble data frames, plus dedicated tidyr::drop_na() and dplyr::dplyr_reconstruct() methods. The two releases since are a namespace version-check correction and a switch from the magrittr pipe to the native pipe in examples.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's job is to be interoperable, so its releases follow whatever the surrounding spatial and tidyverse packages do. The dplyr_reconstruct() work is the clearest example of why that matters: inheriting sf's method caused column binding to silently return an sf object where an sftime object was expected, which is the kind of class-preservation bug that only surfaces two steps downstream. Development is sparse, roughly one release a year.

◆ Prediction

Expect further conversion methods as new spatiotemporal classes appear in the R spatial ecosystem, and continued tracking of dplyr and tidyr generics. The entries do not indicate any planned change to the sftime class itself.

Alternatives to c3dr and sftime

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either c3dr or sftime.

See all c3dr alternatives → · See all sftime alternatives →

Recent activity from c3dr and sftime

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agosftimeExamples switched to the native R pipe
  2. 11mo agosftimeFixes the cubble namespace version check
  3. 11mo agoc3drc3d_write() gains force platform export
  4. 1y agoc3drgcc 15 compilation fix
  5. 1y agoc3drFirst CRAN release
  6. 1y agoc3drrOpenSci review lands; repo moves to rOpenSci
  7. 1y agosftimeConverts from spatstat, sftrack and cubble objects

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between c3dr and sftime?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. c3dr and sftime are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is c3dr better than sftime?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. c3dr and sftime are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to c3dr?

Top c3dr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "c3dr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/c3dr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to sftime?

Top sftime alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sftime alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sftime for the full list with editorial commentary on each.