rtflite
rtflite stopped being an RTF writer and became the conversion layer for clinical table output.
Comparison · Analytics
c3dr vs qualtRics
A side-by-side editorial comparison of c3dr and qualtRics — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropenscir-package
c3dr vs qualtRics: at a glance
What is c3dr?
A biomechanics C3D reader graduated through rOpenSci review to CRAN, then learned to write force plates.
c3dr reads and writes C3D motion-capture files in R, wrapping the EZC3D library. It cleared rOpenSci peer review and moved into the rOpenSci organisation in April 2025, reached CRAN a month later, and shipped force-platform export in c3d_write() in August. Releases are close together and each one has a clear single purpose.
What is qualtRics?
qualtRics moved its contact functions onto XM Directory days before the old endpoints died.
qualtRics is the R client for the Qualtrics v3 API — fetching survey responses, definitions, distributions, and contact lists into tidy data frames. Version 3.3.0 migrated all_mailinglists() and fetch_mailinglist() from the deprecated Research Core Contacts endpoints to XM Directory, ahead of Qualtrics retiring the old ones on June 30, 2026. Authentication and directory discovery are handled automatically, but the new endpoints return a different data shape, so column names changed. Before that, releases had been steady maintenance for two years, mostly around how survey response archives are unpacked.
c3dr vs qualtRics: editorial side-by-side
c3dr
0.0ANALYTICS
A biomechanics C3D reader graduated through rOpenSci review to CRAN, then learned to write force plates.
◆ Current state
c3dr reads and writes C3D motion-capture files in R, wrapping the EZC3D library. It cleared rOpenSci peer review and moved into the rOpenSci organisation in April 2025, reached CRAN a month later, and shipped force-platform export in c3d_write() in August. Releases are close together and each one has a clear single purpose.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is filling in the write side of the read/write pair. Reading was in place from the start; 0.2.0 extends c3d_write() to force-platform data on a direct user request, and the accompanying work preserves matrix structure on import and tracks upstream EZC3D changes. The review-era releases hardened validation and error messages, so the current cycle can be spent on capability rather than polish.
◆ Prediction
Expect further coverage of C3D block types in the writer and continued tracking of EZC3D releases; the changelog gives no signal of analysis features beyond file I/O.
qualtRics
0.0ANALYTICS
qualtRics moved its contact functions onto XM Directory days before the old endpoints died.
◆ Current state
qualtRics is the R client for the Qualtrics v3 API — fetching survey responses, definitions, distributions, and contact lists into tidy data frames. Version 3.3.0 migrated all_mailinglists() and fetch_mailinglist() from the deprecated Research Core Contacts endpoints to XM Directory, ahead of Qualtrics retiring the old ones on June 30, 2026. Authentication and directory discovery are handled automatically, but the new endpoints return a different data shape, so column names changed. Before that, releases had been steady maintenance for two years, mostly around how survey response archives are unpacked.
◆ Where it's heading
This package's roadmap is set by Qualtrics, not by its maintainers, and the release history reads as a sequence of accommodations — endpoint changes, retired APIs, and edge cases in exported files. The team's own recurring theme is reducing surprise: caching was removed from fetch_survey() in 3.2.0 so results are never stale, error handling was standardized on retry semantics, and column mappings were made inspectable via extract_colmap(). Feature additions, when they come, are new endpoints wrapped rather than new abstractions.
◆ Prediction
With the Contacts migration complete, the next likely work is bringing the remaining Research Core-era functions onto XM Directory equivalents before Qualtrics retires more of the old surface.
Alternatives to c3dr and qualtRics
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either c3dr or qualtRics.
git2rdata
git2rdata keeps sharpening one idea: a data frame that produces a readable git diff.
osmextract
osmextract stopped throwing your OpenStreetMap downloads away at the end of every session.
nanoparquet
nanoparquet is chasing byte-level agreement with the Java and Rust Parquet readers, not feature count.
poissonreg
poissonreg gave its models away to parsnip and kept the glue — now it just keeps glmnet honest.
S7
S7 has stopped adding surface and started proving it holds up against R itself.
See all c3dr alternatives → · See all qualtRics alternatives →
Recent activity from c3dr and qualtRics
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoqualtRicsMailing list functions migrated to the XM Directory API ⚡
- 11mo agoqualtRicsZip extraction handles more special characters in survey titles
- 11mo agoc3drc3d_write() gains force platform export
- 1y agoc3drgcc 15 compilation fix
- 1y agoc3drFirst CRAN release
- 1y agoc3drrOpenSci review lands; repo moves to rOpenSci
- 1y agoqualtRicsFix for questions with both recoded values and variable naming
- 1y agoqualtRicsBuild and CI housekeeping alongside the 3.2.1 release
- 2y agoqualtRicsSurvey response caching removed from fetch_survey()
- 3y agoqualtRicsArgument checking refactor and include_* NA fix
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between c3dr and qualtRics?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci, r-package — within Analytics. c3dr and qualtRics are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is c3dr better than qualtRics?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. c3dr and qualtRics are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to c3dr?
Top c3dr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "c3dr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/c3dr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to qualtRics?
Top qualtRics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qualtRics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qualtrics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.