← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

bpbounds vs spmodel

A side-by-side editorial comparison of bpbounds and spmodel — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

bpbounds vs spmodel: at a glance

Featurebpboundsspmodel
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescausal inference, instrumental variables, r, partial identificationspatial-statistics, regression-modelling, kriging, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is bpbounds?

bpbounds found the same swapped-cell bug twice and clamped its bounds back into range

bpbounds computes nonparametric Balke-Pearl bounds on the average causal effect from instrumental variable data, in the bivariate and trivariate cases. After years of pure packaging maintenance, the two 2026 releases are analytical corrections. Bounds on intervention probabilities are now clamped to [0, 1] so derived causal risk ratio bounds cannot fall outside their feasible range, and a cell-ordering error in the trivariate three-category instrument path has been repaired.

Read the full bpbounds trajectory →

What is spmodel?

Spatial regression in R, adding block kriging and then tuning the numerics underneath it

spmodel fits spatial linear and generalised linear models, for both point-referenced and areal data, with prediction and diagnostics attached. Block prediction arrived in 0.11.0 and the releases since have refined it. The most recent release changes optimiser behaviour: the default Nelder-Mead relative stopping tolerance tightens from 1e-4 to 1e-6 to reduce convergence on local rather than global maxima.

Read the full spmodel trajectory →

bpbounds vs spmodel: editorial side-by-side

B
bpbounds
ANALYTICS
0.0

bpbounds found the same swapped-cell bug twice and clamped its bounds back into range

◆ Current state

bpbounds computes nonparametric Balke-Pearl bounds on the average causal effect from instrumental variable data, in the bivariate and trivariate cases. After years of pure packaging maintenance, the two 2026 releases are analytical corrections. Bounds on intervention probabilities are now clamped to [0, 1] so derived causal risk ratio bounds cannot fall outside their feasible range, and a cell-ordering error in the trivariate three-category instrument path has been repaired.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is toward agreement with the reference Stata implementation and away from silently wrong output. The clamping change is described as matching the same fix in the Stata package, which suggests the two implementations are being reconciled rather than developed independently. The cell-ordering defect is the more instructive one: it was fixed in the calculation function in 0.1.7 and then again in the constraint matrix in 0.1.8, meaning the same x=0,y=1 / x=1,y=0 swap had been written in two places.

◆ Prediction

Since the recent fixes came from an external contributor's report and both touched the trivariate three-category path, the untested corners of that path are where further corrections would surface — but the release notes give no roadmap beyond parity with the Stata package.

S
spmodel
ANALYTICS
0.0

Spatial regression in R, adding block kriging and then tuning the numerics underneath it

◆ Current state

spmodel fits spatial linear and generalised linear models, for both point-referenced and areal data, with prediction and diagnostics attached. Block prediction arrived in 0.11.0 and the releases since have refined it. The most recent release changes optimiser behaviour: the default Nelder-Mead relative stopping tolerance tightens from 1e-4 to 1e-6 to reduce convergence on local rather than global maxima.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel. The first is expanding what can be predicted — point predictions, then areal averages over a region via block kriging, then better accuracy and efficiency for that path as the block size default moved from 1000 to 4000 in 0.12.0. The second is numerical trustworthiness, and it is unusually prominent here: a range-constraint option for stability in 0.9.0, a corrected log determinant of the fixed effects in the restricted log likelihood in 0.11.0, a cloud semivariogram that had been doubling the semivariance fixed in 0.11.1, and now a tighter optimiser tolerance. Several of these silently changed results before they were caught.

◆ Prediction

Expect the maintainers to keep publishing explicit reproduction instructions alongside numerical default changes, as 0.13.0 does by documenting the `control = list(reltol = 1e-4)` escape hatch. The entries give no signal of expansion beyond the current model families.

Alternatives to bpbounds and spmodel

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bpbounds or spmodel.

See all bpbounds alternatives → · See all spmodel alternatives →

Recent activity from bpbounds and spmodel

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agobpboundsbpbounds clamps probability bounds and fixes a constraint-matrix swap
  2. 2mo agospmodelTighter optimiser tolerance to avoid local maxima
  3. 2mo agobpboundsbpbounds fixes swapped cells in the trivariate calculation
  4. 6mo agospmodelEmpirical autocovariance function and better block kriging accuracy
  5. 9mo agospmodelCloud semivariogram doubling fixed; geometry warnings added
  6. 1y agospmodelBlock kriging for areal averages and their uncertainty
  7. 1y agospmodelRobust semivariogram and new covariance types for areal models
  8. 1y agospmodelRange constraint option and redefined covariance type names
  9. 2y agobpboundsbpbounds 0.1.6
  10. 3y agobpboundsbpbounds 0.1.5
  11. 6y agobpboundsVersion 0.1.4 on CRAN
  12. 7y agobpboundsVersion 0.1.3

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between bpbounds and spmodel?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. bpbounds and spmodel are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is bpbounds better than spmodel?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. bpbounds and spmodel are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to bpbounds?

Top bpbounds alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bpbounds alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bpbounds for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spmodel?

Top spmodel alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spmodel alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spmodel for the full list with editorial commentary on each.