OHPL
A 2017 chemometrics method frozen in place, visited only when CRAN changes its documentation rules.
Comparison · Analytics
bpbounds vs rstatix
A side-by-side editorial comparison of bpbounds and rstatix — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r
bpbounds vs rstatix: at a glance
What is bpbounds?
bpbounds found the same swapped-cell bug twice and clamped its bounds back into range
bpbounds computes nonparametric Balke-Pearl bounds on the average causal effect from instrumental variable data, in the bivariate and trivariate cases. After years of pure packaging maintenance, the two 2026 releases are analytical corrections. Bounds on intervention probabilities are now clamped to [0, 1] so derived causal risk ratio bounds cannot fall outside their feasible range, and a cell-ordering error in the trivariate three-category instrument path has been repaired.
What is rstatix?
rstatix hit 1.0 by unrounding every p-value it has ever returned
rstatix is the pipe-friendly test wrapper behind most ggpubr annotation workflows — t-tests, Wilcoxon, ANOVA, post-hoc comparisons, effect sizes, all returning tidy data frames. After three quiet years of CRAN-compat patching, it shipped 1.0.0 and 1.1.0 three weeks apart in mid-2026. Both releases push in the same direction: interval estimates and full-precision output for numbers the package previously rounded or omitted.
bpbounds vs rstatix: editorial side-by-side
bpbounds
0.0ANALYTICS
bpbounds found the same swapped-cell bug twice and clamped its bounds back into range
◆ Current state
bpbounds computes nonparametric Balke-Pearl bounds on the average causal effect from instrumental variable data, in the bivariate and trivariate cases. After years of pure packaging maintenance, the two 2026 releases are analytical corrections. Bounds on intervention probabilities are now clamped to [0, 1] so derived causal risk ratio bounds cannot fall outside their feasible range, and a cell-ordering error in the trivariate three-category instrument path has been repaired.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction is toward agreement with the reference Stata implementation and away from silently wrong output. The clamping change is described as matching the same fix in the Stata package, which suggests the two implementations are being reconciled rather than developed independently. The cell-ordering defect is the more instructive one: it was fixed in the calculation function in 0.1.7 and then again in the constraint matrix in 0.1.8, meaning the same x=0,y=1 / x=1,y=0 swap had been written in two places.
◆ Prediction
Since the recent fixes came from an external contributor's report and both touched the trivariate three-category path, the untested corners of that path are where further corrections would surface — but the release notes give no roadmap beyond parity with the Stata package.
rstatix
2.5ANALYTICS
rstatix hit 1.0 by unrounding every p-value it has ever returned
◆ Current state
rstatix is the pipe-friendly test wrapper behind most ggpubr annotation workflows — t-tests, Wilcoxon, ANOVA, post-hoc comparisons, effect sizes, all returning tidy data frames. After three quiet years of CRAN-compat patching, it shipped 1.0.0 and 1.1.0 three weeks apart in mid-2026. Both releases push in the same direction: interval estimates and full-precision output for numbers the package previously rounded or omitted.
◆ Where it's heading
The work is about matching what dedicated effect-size packages give you without taking on their dependencies. Confidence intervals for partial eta squared and for Cohen's d are both computed in base R from noncentral distributions and both check against effectsize; compact letter displays are computed in base R against multcompView. The pattern is deliberate — reproduce the reference implementation, add no imports. Alongside that, the package has started correcting statistical hygiene it got wrong for years, most visibly by no longer rounding p-values before adjusting them.
◆ Prediction
The analytic-interval machinery now exists for eta squared and Cohen's d; the untouched effect sizes in the package — eta squared for nonparametric tests, Cramer's V, rank-biserial correlation — are the obvious next targets for the same base-R noncentral treatment.
Alternatives to bpbounds and rstatix
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bpbounds or rstatix.
fastplyr
A fast dplyr stand-in that keeps finding new places to skip work entirely.
trias
Belgium's invasive-species indicator toolkit is in steady refinement, one plotting edge case at a time.
icesSAG
The ICES stock assessment client took upload away in 2024 and spent two years giving it back.
dggridR
A discrete global grid generator grew cell traversal and became a usable spatial index.
vegan
Community ecology's standard toolkit is retiring the functions a generation of scripts was built on.
See all bpbounds alternatives → · See all rstatix alternatives →
Recent activity from bpbounds and rstatix
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 22d agorstatixrstatix 1.1.0 gives Cohen's d a deterministic confidence interval
- 1mo agobpboundsbpbounds clamps probability bounds and fixes a constraint-matrix swap
- 1mo agorstatixrstatix 1.0.0 stops rounding p-values before adjusting them ⚡
- 2mo agobpboundsbpbounds fixes swapped cells in the trivariate calculation
- 9mo agorstatixrstatix 0.7.3
- 2y agobpboundsbpbounds 0.1.6
- 3y agobpboundsbpbounds 0.1.5
- 3y agorstatixrstatix 0.7.2
- 3y agorstatixrstatix 0.7.1
- 5y agorstatixrstatix 0.7.0
- 6y agobpboundsVersion 0.1.4 on CRAN
- 7y agobpboundsVersion 0.1.3
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between bpbounds and rstatix?
Both compete on the same themes — r — within Analytics. rstatix is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is bpbounds better than rstatix?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rstatix is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to bpbounds?
Top bpbounds alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bpbounds alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bpbounds for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rstatix?
Top rstatix alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rstatix alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rstatix for the full list with editorial commentary on each.