exametrika
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of bolasso and EDAForge — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Bootstrap lasso got a fast mode, a second selection rule, and multinomial support
bolasso implements the bootstrapped lasso, refitting a regularized regression across bootstrap replicates and selecting variables by how consistently they survive. The 0.3.0 release reshaped it: a fast argument computes one cross-validated lambda on the full dataset instead of cross-validating inside every replicate, and selected_variables() gained a choice between the variable inclusion probability rule and a quantile rule based on bootstrap confidence intervals. Since then 0.4.0 exposed the bootstrap indices through bootstrap_samples(), and 0.5.0 extended the whole surface to multinomial responses, returning one list element per outcome level.
EDAForge is a data-quality auditor renamed mid-flight, still finding its CRAN footing.
EDAForge's release feed shows a package changing identity between its first two tags. The v0.1.0 notes describe DataAudit, a data-quality auditing package built around audit_data(), reusable audit_rules() and audit_score(), with install instructions still pointing at vinodhpmd/DataAudit, while the repository now serves EDAForge. Only three tags exist, one of which is a bare compare link with no notes, and the most recent is a CRAN-policy cleanup rather than feature work.
bolasso implements the bootstrapped lasso, refitting a regularized regression across bootstrap replicates and selecting variables by how consistently they survive. The 0.3.0 release reshaped it: a fast argument computes one cross-validated lambda on the full dataset instead of cross-validating inside every replicate, and selected_variables() gained a choice between the variable inclusion probability rule and a quantile rule based on bootstrap confidence intervals. Since then 0.4.0 exposed the bootstrap indices through bootstrap_samples(), and 0.5.0 extended the whole surface to multinomial responses, returning one list element per outcome level.
The package spent 2022 dormant after its initial releases and has been actively developed since late 2024, moving from a single algorithm toward a workbench. The additions cluster around inspection rather than estimation: tidy() for bootstrap-level coefficients, plot_selection_thresholds() for selection stability across thresholds, plot_selected_variables() for the surviving covariates, and now the extracted bootstrap indices. Documented gaps remain, with mgaussian unsupported and multinomial prediction limited to class output.
The two stated limitations in 0.5.0 - no mgaussian family and class-only multinomial prediction - are the most likely next targets, since the maintainer flagged both as possible later additions.
EDAForge's release feed shows a package changing identity between its first two tags. The v0.1.0 notes describe DataAudit, a data-quality auditing package built around audit_data(), reusable audit_rules() and audit_score(), with install instructions still pointing at vinodhpmd/DataAudit, while the repository now serves EDAForge. Only three tags exist, one of which is a bare compare link with no notes, and the most recent is a CRAN-policy cleanup rather than feature work.
The substance so far is all in the DataAudit-named 0.1.0: more than a dozen check families spanning missing values, duplicates, ranges, patterns, dependencies and grouped sequences, wrapped in a structured report object with print and summary methods. The 0.1.1 that follows removes a default output path, moves examples to tempdir() and adds an introductory vignette, which is the standard shape of a package being made acceptable to CRAN. The public identity is currently ahead of the release notes, so a reader arriving at the feed cannot tell from it what EDAForge does.
Expect the next tag to align the notes with the EDAForge name and add exploratory-analysis functions alongside the auditing core; the compliance pass in 0.1.1 points at a CRAN submission as the near-term goal.
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bolasso or EDAForge.
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
An actuarial mainstay spends its releases on CI plumbing, not on new mathematics.
See all bolasso alternatives → · See all EDAForge alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. EDAForge is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. EDAForge is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
Top bolasso alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bolasso alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bolasso for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top EDAForge alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "EDAForge alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/edaforge for the full list with editorial commentary on each.