L1centrality
A graph-centrality package that spent 2026 making its existing measures usable at scale, then went quiet.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of bolasso and eratosthenes — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Bootstrap lasso got a fast mode, a second selection rule, and multinomial support
bolasso implements the bootstrapped lasso, refitting a regularized regression across bootstrap replicates and selecting variables by how consistently they survive. The 0.3.0 release reshaped it: a fast argument computes one cross-validated lambda on the full dataset instead of cross-validating inside every replicate, and selected_variables() gained a choice between the variable inclusion probability rule and a quantile rule based on bootstrap confidence intervals. Since then 0.4.0 exposed the bootstrap indices through bootstrap_samples(), and 0.5.0 extended the whole surface to multinomial responses, returning one list element per outcome level.
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
eratosthenes does Bayesian estimation of archaeological chronologies from relative sequences, absolute constraints and artifact assemblages. The 0.0.9 line built out the inference diagnostics — traceplots, histograms, batch-means MCSE reporting, displacement estimation — and then consolidated artifact probability-density estimation into a single gibbs_ad_type(). The 0.1.0 tag turns outward instead, adding validators for every user-supplied structure and replacing seq_check() with a more informative seq_diag().
bolasso implements the bootstrapped lasso, refitting a regularized regression across bootstrap replicates and selecting variables by how consistently they survive. The 0.3.0 release reshaped it: a fast argument computes one cross-validated lambda on the full dataset instead of cross-validating inside every replicate, and selected_variables() gained a choice between the variable inclusion probability rule and a quantile rule based on bootstrap confidence intervals. Since then 0.4.0 exposed the bootstrap indices through bootstrap_samples(), and 0.5.0 extended the whole surface to multinomial responses, returning one list element per outcome level.
The package spent 2022 dormant after its initial releases and has been actively developed since late 2024, moving from a single algorithm toward a workbench. The additions cluster around inspection rather than estimation: tidy() for bootstrap-level coefficients, plot_selection_thresholds() for selection stability across thresholds, plot_selected_variables() for the surviving covariates, and now the extracted bootstrap indices. Documented gaps remain, with mgaussian unsupported and multinomial prediction limited to class output.
The two stated limitations in 0.5.0 - no mgaussian family and class-only multinomial prediction - are the most likely next targets, since the maintainer flagged both as possible later additions.
eratosthenes does Bayesian estimation of archaeological chronologies from relative sequences, absolute constraints and artifact assemblages. The 0.0.9 line built out the inference diagnostics — traceplots, histograms, batch-means MCSE reporting, displacement estimation — and then consolidated artifact probability-density estimation into a single gibbs_ad_type(). The 0.1.0 tag turns outward instead, adding validators for every user-supplied structure and replacing seq_check() with a more informative seq_diag().
The package is moving from research code to something a non-author can run. Consolidating estimation behind one function, then wrapping every input class in a validator, are the two steps that make failures legible instead of cryptic, and the diagnostics added earlier serve the same end for the sampler itself. Nothing in the window changes the underlying model; the work is all about making it usable and its output checkable.
With inputs validated and diagnostics in place, the next release is more likely to extend the constraint or assemblage modelling than to keep reworking the interface, though the feed's three sparse tags give little to read a cadence from.
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bolasso or eratosthenes.
A graph-centrality package that spent 2026 making its existing measures usable at scale, then went quiet.
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
An actuarial mainstay spends its releases on CI plumbing, not on new mathematics.
See all bolasso alternatives → · See all eratosthenes alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. eratosthenes is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. eratosthenes is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
Top bolasso alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bolasso alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bolasso for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top eratosthenes alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "eratosthenes alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/eratosthenes for the full list with editorial commentary on each.