← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

bcdata vs inlabru

A side-by-side editorial comparison of bcdata and inlabru — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

bcdata vs inlabru: at a glance

Featurebcdatainlabru
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesopen-data, spatial-data, api-client, cql-queriesbayesian-modelling, spatial-statistics, r-package, api-consolidation
Last editorial update1h ago37m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is bcdata?

The R gateway to B.C.'s data catalogue, mostly busy keeping pace with the servers behind it.

bcdata searches the British Columbia Data Catalogue and pulls records from it, including spatial layers retrieved through WMS and WFS with dplyr-style filtering translated into CQL queries sent to the server. The recent releases are small and corrective: 0.5.3 fixes malformed CQL generated by geometry predicates such as INTERSECTS, which the server had been rejecting outright, and 0.5.2 drops a leaflet extension dependency in favour of a base leaflet call. Cadence is a few releases a year.

Read the full bcdata trajectory →

What is inlabru?

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

Read the full inlabru trajectory →

bcdata vs inlabru: editorial side-by-side

B
bcdata
INFRA · APIS
0.0

The R gateway to B.C.'s data catalogue, mostly busy keeping pace with the servers behind it.

◆ Current state

bcdata searches the British Columbia Data Catalogue and pulls records from it, including spatial layers retrieved through WMS and WFS with dplyr-style filtering translated into CQL queries sent to the server. The recent releases are small and corrective: 0.5.3 fixes malformed CQL generated by geometry predicates such as INTERSECTS, which the server had been rejecting outright, and 0.5.2 drops a leaflet extension dependency in favour of a base leaflet call. Cadence is a few releases a year.

◆ Where it's heading

Almost everything in this window is a response to something changing on the other side of the connection: a CKAN 2.9 upgrade that stopped search and listing functions returning complete results, WMS and WFS capability requests that cannot be relied on, dbplyr tightening the rules for local evaluation, and general catalogue-side churn. The package's own interface has been stable since the 0.4.0 change that required local() around locally-evaluated filter calls, and the work since has gone into keeping that stable interface working rather than extending it.

◆ Prediction

Expect the same pattern: targeted fixes as the catalogue and its CKAN, WMS and WFS layers change, with occasional dependency pruning of the kind 0.5.2 did. Nothing in these entries points toward a 0.6 or a change in what the package covers.

I
inlabru
INFRA · APIS
2.5

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

◆ Current state

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc is consolidation of the extension surface rather than expansion of the model catalogue. Every release adds mappers or families with one hand and removes a dependency, a re-export or a deprecated path with the other — plyr in 2.15.0, fmesher's Depends entry in 2.14.1, sp and ggmap in 2.12.0. The compatibility flag bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable and the temporary fm_int/fm_pixels re-exports show a maintainer sequencing breaks across releases instead of landing them together.

◆ Prediction

The 2.14 compatibility flag is still defaulting to TRUE and the fmesher re-exports are described in the entries as temporary, so the next obvious move is a release that flips bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable off and drops those re-exports.

Alternatives to bcdata and inlabru

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bcdata or inlabru.

See all bcdata alternatives → · See all inlabru alternatives →

Recent activity from bcdata and inlabru

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 23d agoinlabruPredictor linearisation rewritten; broom tidiers, truncated families
  2. 1mo agobcdataGeometry predicate filters no longer rejected by the server
  3. 3mo agoinlabruBugfix release: factor contrasts, raster extraction, error classes
  4. 5mo agoinlabruNew mappers, standardised cgeneric support, bru_obs storage refactor
  5. 6mo agobcdataleaflet.extras dependency dropped for WMS legends
  6. 1y agoinlabruMapper classes shortened to bm_*, experimental predictor aggregation
  7. 1y agobcdataSearch and listing functions return complete results again
  8. 1y agobcdataHardened against failing WMS and WFS capability requests
  9. 1y agoinlabruDrops sp and ggmap for an sf-native spatial stack
  10. 3y agobcdataJSON resources readable; organization listing helpers added
  11. 3y agobcdatafilter() now requires local() for locally-evaluated calls

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between bcdata and inlabru?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is bcdata better than inlabru?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to bcdata?

Top bcdata alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bcdata alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bcdata for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to inlabru?

Top inlabru alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inlabru alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inlabru for the full list with editorial commentary on each.